BoxRec

this is smiths first test think he'll come through it with, this will test his power as ramogoadi has only been stopped by murray, mitchell and twice by Tseveenpurev good to see warren moving him along quicker than he normally does. i think smith between 5-6

Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.

Turning out to be a great card with decent tests for our prospects.

Ramogoadi is out!

Smith is fighting Gavin Reid.

shame about Ramogoadi reid will still be a decent test

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.

alot better prospect's out there in my opinion

gemmell wrote:

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.

alot better prospect's out there in my opinion

nah there are alot of really good prospect out there but groves and smith are the 2 oustanding ones, smith is gonna go all the way

diggler wrote:

gemmell wrote:

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.

alot better prospect's out there in my opinion

nah there are alot of really good prospect out there but groves and smith are the 2 oustanding ones, smith is gonna go all the way

i hope your right. think groves and frankie gavin are the best prospects.well there are so many good prospects in britain at the minute. hope swifty show's me how good he really is on friday

When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Switfy will come through easy. Best prospect we have.

Best Prospect out of the lot :P

teddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.

way way better my arse. you say groves looks average at best!! you sure you dont need glasses mate?

teddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.

if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video's

gemmell wrote:

teddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.

if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video's

Yep thats massive justification for him not being a better prospect than Grooves, I stand corrected.....D!ck

gemmell wrote:

teddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.

if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video's

I wouldnt read anything into that gemmell - look who his promoter is - Wazza doesnt like to see his fighters fights publicised via the free web. Take it from someone who has seen Swifty box live a few times: the lad has all the skills and power to boot. A class act

TerribleTerry wrote:

gemmell wrote:

teddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.

if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video's

I wouldnt read anything into that gemmell - look who his promoter is - Wazza doesnt like to see his fighters fights publicised via the free web. Take it from someone who has seen Swifty box live a few times: the lad has all the skills and power to boot. A class act

i didnt say he isn't good i have seen him a few times on friday fight night. i knw he has the skills.but that arshole teddy said smith is way way better then groves and that groves is average.nearly all of wazza's fighters are on youtube

"i didnt say he isn't good i have seen him a few times on friday fight night. i knw he has the skills.but that arshole teddy said smith is way way better then groves and that groves is average.nearly all of wazza's fighters are on youtube"

Groves is an over-rated prospect imo....do u no what imo means?

teddy007 wrote:

gemmell wrote:

teddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.

if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video's

Yep thats massive justification for him not being a better prospect than Grooves, I stand corrected.....D!ck

did i say he wasn't a better prospect? i dont think he is but i didnt say that. you fukin mong.im not claiming that's justification but surely if he was a class act warren would have his fights on franks youtube page.i've seen him a few times on friday fight night's and he is impressive but groves has looked just as impressive and for you to say george is average what does that make degale.jeffries.dickinson all the other smw and lhw prospects thn? he by far looks the best of the bunch."ste smith is way way better" fukin knob jockey

teddy007 wrote:"i didnt say he isn't good i have seen him a few times on friday fight night. i knw he has the skills.but that arshole teddy said smith is way way better then groves and that groves is average.nearly all of wazza's fighters are on youtube"

Groves is an over-rated prospect imo....do u no what imo means?

no i dont actually i've seen alot of people type it in there messages. could you enlightn me?

Gemmell...i'm not getting into an argument with, through fear of being banned, so get f*cked.

teddy007 wrote:Gemmell...i'm not getting into an argument with, through fear of being banned, so get f*cked.

ok teddy bear fukin clown

gemmell wrote:

teddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.

if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video's

dont think thats got anything at all to do with it stes a friend of mine he no,s wer he wants to go and what he can do i think he will go all the way but because he dont have videos on youtubes got f all to do with how big a prospect he is thats a load of bull 2 be onnest ian napa is british champ no fight videos so explain that one

Shame Ramogoadi pulled out that would be a good tester for Swifty, Swifty should beat Reid imo

Gemmell, you sure you've seen Swifty on FFN? I've only ever spotted him on it once.

leeharding wrote:

gemmell wrote:

teddy007 wrote:When I had a look at Groves I thought he was average at best and has a long way to go, thats not to say he cannot go far but Ste Smith is a way way better prospect imo.

if smith was by far the best prospect like you say.people would put his video's on youtube.7 fights no video's

dont think thats got anything at all to do with it stes a friend of mine he no,s wer he wants to go and what he can do i think he will go all the way but because he dont have videos on youtubes got f all to do with how big a prospect he is thats a load of bull 2 be onnest ian napa is british champ no fight videos so explain that one

yeh i understand what your saying BUT if wazza thinks he will be great then why dosn't he put his fights up? he does with the olympians and other prospects. i think the lad's a good prospect

jBacca wrote:Gemmell, you sure you've seen Swifty on FFN? I've only ever spotted him on it once.

yeh i have definitely seen him.need to see more of him tho. not sure wether it's once or twice ive seen the kid