Page 1 of 1
Hare Ko 2 Bergman
Posted: 06 Sep 2003, 18:52
by stujones
Any thoughts.
Hare continued his roll, and while Bergman's chin has gone - I think a 2nd round KO is still a testamony to his improving power. I would have like to have seen Bergman test Hare a bit more. But can't fault the display.
Now lets see Hare vs Khaliq.
Not been a good week for me and predictions. Norton to beat Hobson, Larsen to beat Ottke, and I did say I had a suspision that an upset might happen here (although that was a mere 2nd thought). For most part I thought Hare would win easy, but I DID get some pre fight worries (and I said them out loud).
If you want to win money then I think you should put your House on Moseley.
Cause my prediction is DLH KO 10 or a close UD/MD.
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 05:40
by tea
Stu. Don't open a bookies!
Chris Aston......Trainer Hobson/Hare/Robinson.
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 07:50
by Guest
Chris
Have you noticed that Hare is now ranked 4th by the IBF and that positions 1 and 2 are not filled by any boxer in their ratings? The Dane Thomas Damgaard is rated at no.3.
Now, what with Mayorga going in with Cory Spinks before the end of the year, there is a real chance that the IBF title will be up for grabs. Mayorga should be too strong for Spinks and then he'll head up to light-middleweight and probably vacate the title.
Things could really open up for James Hare. Last night saw a very clinical performance by James who refused to let Bergman back into the fight like Khaliq did. The ease of James's win didn't suprise me. Bergman was totally shot to bits. He proved this against Khaliq.
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 10:16
by stujones
Chris,
Well done on a excellent weekend.
I have posed the questions of James Hare to Corey Spinks manager (on another site). He's done his research on Khaliq, but I don't know if he's seen your guy before.
I look forward to seeing Hare in action again, the guys a real talent, I don't say that about alot of the British boxers.
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 10:44
by kevin
Anyone got the rest of the results from Huddersfield and Aberdeen last night.
Kev
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 14:56
by tea
HARE TKO 2 BERGMAN
COOK TKO 3 HOWARD
RHODES DREW DIXON
PAGE PTS 6 PHILLIPS
ANDERSON PTS 6 STARKOV
MORRISON TKO 2 MAHONEY
WALLACE PTS 4 ????
MCIVER PTS 4 SENIOR
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 14:59
by tea
STUJONES
WAT SITE DID U POSE THE QUESTION ON?
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 15:01
by tea
JAMES HARE IS
NO #8 IN THE WBA
23 IN THE WBC
4 IN THE IBF
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 15:02
by kevin
Thanks Chris
Kevin
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 15:08
by tea
IT WON'T CHRIS IT WAS TEA(HIS SON).
ALSO WAT DO U THINK THE OUT COME WOULD BE BETWEEN COREY SPINKS VS JAMES HARE?
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 15:10
by kevin
Thanks Son of Chris.
I think Hare would win with a late stoppage
Kev
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 15:19
by tea
WAT ABOUT HARE VS MARGARITO
HARE VS DAMGARD
HARE VS FORREST
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 15:29
by kevin
I think he might well beat Damgaard, but the other two are a bit out of his league at the moment
Kev
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 15:32
by stujones
Tea the 3 guys you mentioned are very good.
I think Hare would just be too smart for Damguard and win a UD.
Margarito is an interesting character, I was impressed with him against Diaz, but dissapointed with him against a chinless Lewis, he was getting tagged quite often prior to catching 6 heads. Perhaps the recent form of Diaz shows that Magarito is limited. Give Hare about 2 years and I think he'll probably win, at this moment it is 60:40 Margarito.
Forrest, sorry I think it would probably be a unaminous decision loss, the guys size would just be too much. He's still a special boxer who might be unlucky not to call himself champion at this moment (the rematch was very close).
Posted: 07 Sep 2003, 16:11
by tea
THANKS FOR UR HONEST OPINION