Page 1 of 1
Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 11 Dec 2009, 05:08
by Brute
Proved tonight that you can have 28 pro fights, win most of them and still not have a clue!
KOed in 48 seconds by a man with one pro fight behind him.

Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 12 Dec 2009, 03:51
by The Raw Prawn
Didn't see the fight but Boxrec tells us that Singwancha's opponent Dilshod Mahmudov ia a well performed
Uzbek amateur at LW & Welter who did well at World Amateurs and 2 Olympics since 2003.
Could be one to watch.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 12 Dec 2009, 04:14
by Lethaleigh76
It was over pretty quick, Dilshod looks well schooled, good corner, and stopped him with some lethal body shots, speaking of body shots, did any one see Ranee Ganoy combination ?
![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 12 Dec 2009, 07:14
by The Raw Prawn
On that same card Steve Maxwell's 2 nd round TKO over Matthew Paulley was unexpected.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 12 Dec 2009, 22:56
by Brute
Lethaleigh76 wrote:It was over pretty quick, Dilshod looks well schooled, good corner, and stopped him with some lethal body shots, speaking of body shots, did any one see Ranee Ganoy combination ?
![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
Ranee looked sharp.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 12 Dec 2009, 22:59
by Brute
The Raw Prawn wrote:Didn't see the fight but Boxrec tells us that Singwancha's opponent Dilshod Mahmudov ia a well performed
Uzbek amateur at LW & Welter who did well at World Amateurs and 2 Olympics since 2003.
Could be one to watch.
He beat Dib as an amateur. Lost 12-7 in last years Olympics to the eventual Gold Medal winner.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 13 Dec 2009, 17:30
by Marlin
Soft, very soft.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 14 Dec 2009, 00:45
by Soundkamp
come on what did you expect the bloke been droped before the 3rd in his last 3 losses prior to this and he was up against a seasoned amateur like Dilshod
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 14 Dec 2009, 03:20
by 'Frilla
Brute wrote:Lethaleigh76 wrote:It was over pretty quick, Dilshod looks well schooled, good corner, and stopped him with some lethal body shots, speaking of body shots, did any one see Ranee Ganoy combination ?
![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
Ranee looked sharp.
he needs a BIG fight, and yeah he always looks sharp, very strong, the move to the Grange old skool gym from the Bohol stable was a good move for Ranee

Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 14 Dec 2009, 22:13
by Brute
harshfriller wrote:Brute wrote:Lethaleigh76 wrote:It was over pretty quick, Dilshod looks well schooled, good corner, and stopped him with some lethal body shots, speaking of body shots, did any one see Ranee Ganoy combination ?
![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
Ranee looked sharp.
he needs a BIG fight, and yeah he always looks sharp, very strong, the move to the Grange old skool gym from the Bohol stable was a good move for Ranee

Hermie Bohol made the decision for Ranee to switch gyms. He thought Billy Treacy and co could do more for Ranee than he could.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 15 Dec 2009, 00:40
by 'Frilla
and they could do more, ever since they moved him there, hes been fighting, no one wanted to fight him wen he was with hermie and jeff Bohol
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 16 Dec 2009, 04:29
by oliverfennell
Brute wrote:Proved tonight that you can have 28 pro fights, win most of them and still not have a clue!
Victor Oganov?
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 17 Dec 2009, 00:30
by Brute
No, Sataporn Singwancha. Don't you live in Thailand?
Oganov only loses to good fighters.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 17 Dec 2009, 00:40
by 'Frilla
Brute wrote:No, Sataporn Singwancha. Don't you live in Thailand?
Oganov only loses to good fighters.
cant get anymore tougher than OGANOV
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 17 Dec 2009, 03:56
by oliverfennell
I knew you guys wouldn't like me saying it, but Oganov was roundly exposed in those two losses. Tough, game, yes... but a very inflated record, as proved when he stepped up.
Only loses to good fighters, true.. but he hasn't beaten any, either.
By the way, I know nothing about Sataporn Singwancha, so I'm not defending him. It's just that "winning most of your fights but still not having a clue" is hardly a new concept in boxing.
For balance, I submit my fellow Brit Nadeem Siddique:
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 17 Dec 2009, 18:17
by Marlin
Insignificant.
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 18 Dec 2009, 03:39
by oliverfennell
Marlin wrote:Insignificant.
Singwancha? Oganov? Siddique? Or is it the best insult you can muster?
Re: Sataporn Singwancha
Posted: 18 Dec 2009, 06:53
by Hounddawg
Oganov is heavily over rated, his power against well oiled machines is insignificant.