Page 1 of 2
Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 00:12
by Grimm
Can you think of knockdowns that were called that actually weren't knockdowns?
Or knockdowns that didn't get called?
Not knockdowns that come to mind
Bert Coopers big punch against Holyfield
Hopkins' right hand against Tarver
Samuel Peter hitting Yanqui Diaz while Diaz was still on his feet but getting penalized for hitting a downed opponent.
Knockdowns that weren't called
Judah vs Mayweather
One of many in Mayweather vs Corley
Plenty more I just can't think of them now.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 00:52
by dempseyfire
The ropes saved Evander from a KD . . therefore it was a legit knockdown.
I also remember Peter clearly hitting Diaz after Diaz had gone to a knee.
Don't remember Tarver-Hop as well but I think Tarver's glove touched the canvas . . .could be wrong though.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 01:14
by Grimm
dempseyfire wrote:The ropes saved Evander from a KD . . therefore it was a legit knockdown.
I also remember Peter clearly hitting Diaz after Diaz had gone to a knee.
Don't remember Tarver-Hop as well but I think Tarver's glove touched the canvas . . .could be wrong though.
Not aware of the ropes saving you from falling counting as a knockdown. If that's the case anyone who leaned on the ropes should be considered knocked down.
Peter vs Diaz.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9uHoujT ... vie_player
Look at both of Diaz feet still on the ground at 3:32
Tarver just got knocked off balance his glove never touched the ground. Watch closely
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-4sfCt_4gY
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 02:32
by crusader
Katsidis didn't go down against Earl and Marquez should have been ruled down against Barrera.
MAB vs Marquez 5:07
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Gi55n0a ... re=channel
Katsidis vs Earl 2:17
Hard to tell from that angle, but slo-mo replays revealed that Katsidis never touched down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JPnZtZu ... re=related
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 02:47
by SaadOffTheDeck
Not: Roldan/Hagler & MAB/Morales 1 in rd 12
Was: Morales/MAB 2, can't remember which round.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 03:00
by jaclem2
...damn!!!!! i've posted this twice now and for some reason it hasn't shown up. so..once again......the cooper kd over holyfield was much like the one in the first louis schmeling fight when the referee moved louis to a neutral corner and started a count against max, who was on his feet but against the ropes with his back partly turned toward louis and he was taking punishment. as soon as max turned forward the count stopped and the fight continued.
i suppose we could call that a start toward the standing eight count.
if i remember correctly, holy was not only against the ropes but almost going through them and was helpless to defend himself, so the ref called it a knockdown, which seemed sensible to me.
wepner scored a knockdown against ali by half-hitting and half pushing ali as ali was backing away. not a power punch, but ali did hbit the canvas so it was correctly called a knockdown.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 03:09
by The End
There was a knockdown called in the Lewis Tyson fight that shouldn't have been.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 03:53
by Goodnight, Irene
dempseyfire wrote:The ropes saved Evander from a KD . . therefore it was a legit knockdown.
I also remember Peter clearly hitting Diaz after Diaz had gone to a knee.
Don't remember Tarver-Hop as well but I think Tarver's glove touched the canvas . . .could be wrong though.
On the subject of Holyfield-Cooper, Dempsey is right --- though I disagree with that rule, & always have.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 03:57
by Goodnight, Irene
The End wrote:There was a knockdown called in the Lewis Tyson fight that shouldn't have been.
This was the one I was to mention, as it immediately sprung to the forefront of my mind. It was a shocking call, & punctuated one of
the most appallingly biased refereeing performances of the decade. Round eight, Tyson is ruled down, when it is inexcusable for a ref to make the, "mistake" of seeing him down, since he wasn't even close to touching the canvas. It effectively was enacted to save him from more punishment, in one of many efforts that night from Cotton to keep Lewis from winning.
His perpetual bullsh!t back-fired in the end, though --- all his crap actually prolonged Lewis' punishment of Tyson. Here's one I can remember dividing people everywhere right down the fucken line when it happened, & they're still arguing about it today --- the very contentious, debatable round twelve, Barrera-Morales I

Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 11:10
by granberry
Mike Weaver knocked Larry Holmes down and the stooge Don King 'referee' didn't call it.
Frazier knocked Ali down with a left hook at the beginning of the 11th round of their first fight.
You can see Frazier's astonished look (as he stood in a neutral corner) when 'referee' Merchante called it a slip.
One round earlier 'referee' Merchante had stuck his fingers in Frazier's eye.
Angelo Dundee's personal 'referee', Harold Valan, was very reluctant to call any knockdowns when Floyd Patterson floored Jimmy Ellis.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 12:40
by Goodnight, Irene
Another which had me shaking my head was (I think the ref in question might've been Lawrence Cole) the decision to rule Pacquiao legitimately down in round one of his first encounter with Barrera.
What...the...fvck!?
I thought Mayweather was legitimately down against Judah, but that was a close call. I can live with the official verdict. Likewise, Marquez against Barrera. Thought the guy was down legit, but you could understand the ref's decision.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 13:24
by granberry
The Bob Foster-Frankie DePaula fight is a good example.
In the first round NY hometowner DePaula pushed Foster down and the stooge NY ref immediately called it a "knockdown."
Foster said (hearably) to the ref, "You're not gonna get away with that,"
and then immediately opened up completely and knocked DePaula down three times, ending the fight right there.
So the stooge ref did DePaula no favors since Foster would have taken his time and not gone all out so early if the ref hadn't tried to pull that.
That showed how superior Foster was at that stage of his career; He could take out a strong, untired contender like DePaula any time he chose to.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 16:09
by BoxBuzz
Was Wepner standing on Ali's foot when Ali went down? Some say yes, some say no. Is there any film that captures that "toe action"? Some of us don't need to actually see these things to "know" if they are factual or not. Me? I need a visual to be sure.
By the way if you're standing on your opponents toe at the time you hit them and they go down is that or is it not a legitimate KD? Is there a rule that specifically pertains?
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 16:16
by Collins2000
The End wrote:There was a knockdown called in the Lewis Tyson fight that shouldn't have been.
How about the Lewis - Akinwande bout right at the end of round 1 (I think, but years since I saw it). Was that a knockdown?
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 16:57
by Musashi
Grimm wrote:Not aware of the ropes saving you from falling counting as a knockdown. If that's the case anyone who leaned on the ropes should be considered knocked down.
It's referee's discretion but you can pretty much tell when a guy is being held up by the ropes and when he's just "leaning on the ropes."
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 17:46
by allworld80
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Likewise, Marquez against Barrera. Thought the guy was down legit, but you could understand the ref's decision.
First one I thought of. The KD was legit, no question of that. Jay Nady bumbled that one up good.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 21:00
by yancey
Any opinions on whether or not Chuvalo got knocked down in his fight with Bonavena?
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 03 Feb 2010, 21:07
by yancey
granberry wrote:Mike Weaver knocked Larry Holmes down and the stooge Don King 'referee' didn't call it.
Frazier knocked Ali down with a left hook at the beginning of the 11th round of their first fight.
You can see Frazier's astonished look (as he stood in a neutral corner) when 'referee' Merchante called it a slip.
One round earlier 'referee' Merchante had stuck his fingers in Frazier's eye.
Angelo Dundee's personal 'referee', Harold Valan, was very reluctant to call any knockdowns when Floyd Patterson floored Jimmy Ellis.
Patterson definitely knocked Ellis down with a right hand.
I watched that fight live on Wide World of Sports when I was a kid and was astounded at that decision.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 02:44
by granberry
yancey wrote:granberry wrote:Mike Weaver knocked Larry Holmes down and the stooge Don King 'referee' didn't call it.
Frazier knocked Ali down with a left hook at the beginning of the 11th round of their first fight.
You can see Frazier's astonished look (as he stood in a neutral corner) when 'referee' Merchante called it a slip.
One round earlier 'referee' Merchante had stuck his fingers in Frazier's eye.
Angelo Dundee's personal 'referee', Harold Valan, was very reluctant to call any knockdowns when Floyd Patterson floored Jimmy Ellis.
Patterson definitely knocked Ellis down with a right hand.
I watched that fight live on Wide World of Sports when I was a kid and was astounded at that decision.
That was a prime Angelo Dundee production.
He took his cheese 'champion' Ellis to a foreign country
and protected him by using his own personal "referee," Harold Valan.
Dundee's referee
Valan had the only vote on the decision.
After Ellis got trounced by Patterson and kept his 'title' on Valan's decision,
the Swedish newspaper headlines read "Just a sparring partner,' referring to Ellis.
Dundee got away with murder in foreign countries he took his fighters to.
Look at the first Cooper-Clay fight.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 08:36
by IKSRTFO
It depends on the rules of a knockdown because its jaded. Toney leaned against the ropes for Jones and it was ruled a knockdown. Mayweather's glove touched the canvas and it was not ruled a knockdown. It seems the calls were pretty reversed but I would have no problem if they both would've received the same call.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 19:37
by granberry
The rule for a knockdown is simple:
If any part of a fighter's body other than the bottom of his feet touch the canvas, he is down.
Knee, glove, behind, back, etc.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 04 Feb 2010, 20:49
by Goodnight, Irene
granberry wrote:The rule for a knockdown is simple:
If any part of a fighter's body other than the bottom of his feet touch the canvas, he is down.
Knee, glove, behind, back, etc.
Wrong. If he slips, he slips. Ala, Ali in round eleven.
Not that the clueless Granberry could interpret what he saw correctly if he tried. LOL.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 05 Feb 2010, 00:01
by BoxBuzz
granberry wrote:yancey wrote:granberry wrote:Mike Weaver knocked Larry Holmes down and the stooge Don King 'referee' didn't call it.
Frazier knocked Ali down with a left hook at the beginning of the 11th round of their first fight.
You can see Frazier's astonished look (as he stood in a neutral corner) when 'referee' Merchante called it a slip.
One round earlier 'referee' Merchante had stuck his fingers in Frazier's eye.
Angelo Dundee's personal 'referee', Harold Valan, was very reluctant to call any knockdowns when Floyd Patterson floored Jimmy Ellis.
Patterson definitely knocked Ellis down with a right hand.
I watched that fight live on Wide World of Sports when I was a kid and was astounded at that decision.
That was a prime Angelo Dundee production.
He took his cheese 'champion' Ellis to a foreign country
and protected him by using his own personal "referee," Harold Valan.
Dundee's referee
Valan had the only vote on the decision.
After Ellis got trounced by Patterson and kept his 'title' on Valan's decision,
the Swedish newspaper headlines read "Just a sparring partner,' referring to Ellis.
Dundee got away with murder in foreign countries he took his fighters to.
Look at the first Cooper-Clay fight.
Yep that Cooper Clay fight was amazing. Remember when bags of stuffing started coming out of Ali's glove, and they brought in the seamstresses to fix the glove? The worked on it for hours and then they had to call the fight on account of darkness. Next morning everybody gets up, (and now Clay has had all night to rest) and then poor Henry comes back to finish the job just to have the ref call the fight off in Clay's favor. Why? Just because Henry had cut his face shaving that second morning of the fight.
That's how it went right?
It just weren't fair.
However Patterson did knock Ellis down. At least that's the way I saw it as well.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 05 Feb 2010, 02:15
by granberry
Goodnight, Irene wrote:granberry wrote:The rule for a knockdown is simple:
If any part of a fighter's body other than the bottom of his feet touch the canvas, he is down.
Knee, glove, behind, back, etc.
Wrong. If he slips, he slips. Ala, Ali in round eleven.
Not that the clueless Granberry could interpret what he saw correctly if he tried. LOL.
Low grade moron Irene wouldn't know a knockdown if it hit him in the teeth.
Ali "slipped" when Frazier hit him on the chin with a left hook. LOL.
Next Ali shill irene will tell us that Merchante did not stick his fingers in Frazier's eye.
Re: Knockdowns that shouldn't have been? Vice versa?
Posted: 05 Feb 2010, 02:25
by yancey
granberry wrote:Goodnight, Irene wrote:granberry wrote:The rule for a knockdown is simple:
If any part of a fighter's body other than the bottom of his feet touch the canvas, he is down.
Knee, glove, behind, back, etc.
Wrong. If he slips, he slips. Ala, Ali in round eleven.
Not that the clueless Granberry could interpret what he saw correctly if he tried. LOL.
Low grade moron Irene wouldn't know a knockdown if it hit him in the teeth.
Ali "slipped" when Frazier hit him on the chin with a left hook. LOL.
Next Ali shill irene will tell us that Merchante did not stick his fingers in Frazier's eye.
Tell us how you really feel about Irene, Gran.
C'mon, don't be shy.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)