TOMMY BELL

Post Reply
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

TOMMY BELL

Post by granberry »

Image
TOMMY BELL

All I know about Tommy Bell is that he and Ray Robinson fought for Marty Servo's vacated welterweight title and Robinson did not have an easy time.

Tommy Bell knocked Robinson down and was well ahead after half of the fight.

Robinson had to fight like heck to get back in the fight. He knocked Bell down in a later round and eked out a decision.

I can tell Bell is a very good fighter just from seeing the photo above.
Expug
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4467
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 18:40

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by Expug »

Tommy Bell strikes me as a real fighters fighter.
I dont remember seeing any film of him. Maybe a brief clip vs Ray, not sure though.
Anybody who cops a decision vs Fritzie Zivic and goes the distance in multiple fights vs Robinson and Lamotta earns my respect.
In fact, right after losing that tough title shot vs Ray,a couple months later in his next fight he goes in vs Jake.
Like I said, a fighters fighter.
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by granberry »

And LaMotta always outweighed Bell by ten pounds or more.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by Robinson »

It would be nice to see some footage of him.

It is a real shame that a lot talented men like
Bell are almost forgotten and the so called
boxing historians seldom mention their triumph's
or hard work when they print their books.

It looks like he took alot of fights late minute
notice and fought often, which is no doubt
why he has a lot of 'L's on his record. Taking
fights on short notice seems like a good idea
at the time, but the reason behind a loss is
often forgotten, but that 'L' always stands
the test of time.
TheGreatA
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 104
Joined: 31 Dec 2008, 21:05

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by TheGreatA »

I think there's footage of him fighting LaMotta. Maybe I'm wrong.
TheGreatA
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 104
Joined: 31 Dec 2008, 21:05

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by TheGreatA »

http://www.sweetfights.com/send_order.html

Search for LaMotta - Bell II.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by Ezzard »

Good thread topic and good picture. Never seen a picture of him before.

Looks like Bell started off in the deep end in terms of the quality of his opponents. Got admire a guy like that.
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by granberry »

TheGreatA wrote:http://www.sweetfights.com/send_order.html

Search for LaMotta - Bell II.
A,

Not quite sure how to use this info.

Can you say a little more.

Thanks.
wsbuf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 981
Joined: 17 Jun 2002, 17:23

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by wsbuf »

Robinson wrote:It would be nice to see some footage of him.

It is a real shame that a lot talented men like
Bell are almost forgotten and the so called
boxing historians seldom mention their triumph's
or hard work when they print their books.

It looks like he took alot of fights late minute
notice and fought often, which is no doubt
why he has a lot of 'L's on his record. Taking
fights on short notice seems like a good idea
at the time, but the reason behind a loss is
often forgotten, but that 'L' always stands
the test of time.
Agreed. I'm tired of same old stories. I just finished Angelo Dundee's book. I wish he talked more of his fighters he had (Dupas, Pastrano, etc.) . While his relationship with Ali and Leonard was interesting, it has been said over and over.
jimglen
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 987
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 04:38

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by jimglen »

It's nice too see people fed up with the same stuff and fighters regurgitated over and over and over again, a run through many of my posts expands on this very thing.

The many great fighters, and I do mean great, that have graced the squared circle is unbeleivable, many of whom are better than many of our historic champions and greats.
A look into some of these mens lifes and careers tells a great story indeed.

I am proud to say that in Gilroy was here, there is reference and status on many great fighters that the world has forgotten about.

Do you think there's a Boxing Heaven, where the Real TOP men can compete equally and fairly against one another, I sure hope so!
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by granberry »

jimglen wrote:It's nice too see people fed up with the same stuff and fighters regurgitated over and over and over again, a run through many of my posts expands on this very thing.

The many great fighters, and I do mean great, that have graced the squared circle is unbeleivable, many of whom are better than many of our historic champions and greats.
A look into some of these mens lifes and careers tells a great story indeed.

I am proud to say that in Gilroy was here, there is reference and status on many great fighters that the world has forgotten about.

Do you think there's a Boxing Heaven, where the Real TOP men can compete equally and fairly against one another, I sure hope so!
Nice post, Jim.
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by granberry »

wsbuf wrote:
Robinson wrote:It would be nice to see some footage of him.

It is a real shame that a lot talented men like
Bell are almost forgotten and the so called
boxing historians seldom mention their triumph's
or hard work when they print their books.

It looks like he took alot of fights late minute
notice and fought often, which is no doubt
why he has a lot of 'L's on his record. Taking
fights on short notice seems like a good idea
at the time, but the reason behind a loss is
often forgotten, but that 'L' always stands
the test of time.
Agreed. I'm tired of same old stories. I just finished Angelo Dundee's book. I wish he talked more of his fighters he had (Dupas, Pastrano, etc.) . While his relationship with Ali and Leonard was interesting, it has been said over and over.
The AGENDA is sell Ali and Leonard.

It is set in place and that is what it is.

That's what you will get.
The SAME, instantly recognizable, very tired agenda.

In order to survive in the media you go with the designated agenda or you are out (on your behind).

No deviations allowed.
TheGreatA
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 104
Joined: 31 Dec 2008, 21:05

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by TheGreatA »

granberry wrote:
TheGreatA wrote:http://www.sweetfights.com/send_order.html

Search for LaMotta - Bell II.
A,

Not quite sure how to use this info.

Can you say a little more.

Thanks.
sweetfights.com lists the LaMotta-Tommy Bell II fight among those that they sell. I doubt it's false advertising so footage of the fight is definitely out there.
wsbuf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 981
Joined: 17 Jun 2002, 17:23

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by wsbuf »

granberry wrote:
wsbuf wrote:
Robinson wrote:It would be nice to see some footage of him.

It is a real shame that a lot talented men like
Bell are almost forgotten and the so called
boxing historians seldom mention their triumph's
or hard work when they print their books.

It looks like he took alot of fights late minute
notice and fought often, which is no doubt
why he has a lot of 'L's on his record. Taking
fights on short notice seems like a good idea
at the time, but the reason behind a loss is
often forgotten, but that 'L' always stands
the test of time.
Agreed. I'm tired of same old stories. I just finished Angelo Dundee's book. I wish he talked more of his fighters he had (Dupas, Pastrano, etc.) . While his relationship with Ali and Leonard was interesting, it has been said over and over.
The AGENDA is sell Ali and Leonard.

It is set in place and that is what it is.

That's what you will get.
The SAME, instantly recognizable, very tired agenda.

In order to survive in the media you go with the designated agenda or you are out (on your behind).

No deviations allowed.
Exact reason I borrowed from Library and did not buy it. Same with Bert Sugar's book titled 100 Greatest Fighters of all Time. What can be said about those fighters that hasn't already been done. Now maybe the "100 Greatest fighters whose stories havn't been told" would be a great book!
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by Collins2000 »

jimglen wrote:The many great fighters, and I do mean great, that have graced the squared circle is unbeleivable, many of whom are better than many of our historic champions and greats.
Jimbo, can you give us a list of these many fighters who were better than our historic greats such as Louis, Robinson, Armstrong etc?
jimglen
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 987
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 04:38

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by jimglen »

"who said anything about Louis, Robinson and Armstrong," they are legitimate Greats...

now when you talk about Hopkins or Calzaghe and the like, their NOT...

the best example that I can give is Robert Villemain, yet his praises are rarely sung.

Eric Boon too, Ernie Roderick aswell, Britain's Prince and Embassador Len Harvey, the little Scot, Jim Brady, the French Gypsy Theo Medina and obviously countless great fighters.

lets not make something out of this that it's not Collins,
people here and on other boards(not just me), are merely crediting great fighters(legitimately), that are forgotten or not too well known.

who posted a "newspaper clipping" recently about Louis and some other great, commenting on one of the best fighters they had ever known? it was someone most of us never heard of, never mind knew about - yet they said he was great... same thing, there are lots of great fighters, lots!
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by Collins2000 »

So, just to make this crystal clear, Jimbo, you are merely saying that some of the very good fighters of the past have been forgotten?
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by Robinson »

wsbuf wrote:
Robinson wrote:It would be nice to see some footage of him.

It is a real shame that a lot talented men like
Bell are almost forgotten and the so called
boxing historians seldom mention their triumph's
or hard work when they print their books.

It looks like he took alot of fights late minute
notice and fought often, which is no doubt
why he has a lot of 'L's on his record. Taking
fights on short notice seems like a good idea
at the time, but the reason behind a loss is
often forgotten, but that 'L' always stands
the test of time.
Agreed. I'm tired of same old stories. I just finished Angelo Dundee's book. I wish he talked more of his fighters he had (Dupas, Pastrano, etc.) . While his relationship with Ali and Leonard was interesting, it has been said over and over.

I got the book in the hopes of reading about Ellis, Pastrano etc, and even
some come back Foreman. But the book addressed nothing new and really
seemed to celebrate the Ali angle too much. It is an ashame because
to me reading about say a Jimmy Ellis in this case is more interesting,
and that is only because I have had my fill on Ali as a young lad. Ali,
Tyson, Robinson etc is the grade school education of a boxing fan,
the trouble is the late high school and university education is harder
to come by because less and less people want to print anything on
the rarer and more 'obscure' fighters.
TheGreatA
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 104
Joined: 31 Dec 2008, 21:05

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by TheGreatA »

TheGreatA wrote:I think there's footage of him fighting LaMotta. Maybe I'm wrong.
The footage is on youtube now thanks to My2Sense and Raging B(_)LL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZSJHlO5phA
slakka
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 174
Joined: 03 Nov 2008, 16:14

Re: TOMMY BELL

Post by slakka »

Robinson wrote:
wsbuf wrote:
Robinson wrote:It would be nice to see some footage of him.

It is a real shame that a lot talented men like
Bell are almost forgotten and the so called
boxing historians seldom mention their triumph's
or hard work when they print their books.

It looks like he took alot of fights late minute
notice and fought often, which is no doubt
why he has a lot of 'L's on his record. Taking
fights on short notice seems like a good idea
at the time, but the reason behind a loss is
often forgotten, but that 'L' always stands
the test of time.
Agreed. I'm tired of same old stories. I just finished Angelo Dundee's book. I wish he talked more of his fighters he had (Dupas, Pastrano, etc.) . While his relationship with Ali and Leonard was interesting, it has been said over and over.

I got the book in the hopes of reading about Ellis, Pastrano etc, and even
some come back Foreman. But the book addressed nothing new and really
seemed to celebrate the Ali angle too much. It is an ashame because
to me reading about say a Jimmy Ellis in this case is more interesting,
and that is only because I have had my fill on Ali as a young lad. Ali,
Tyson, Robinson etc is the grade school education of a boxing fan,
the trouble is the late high school and university education is harder
to come by because less and less people want to print anything on
the rarer and more 'obscure' fighters.
Which book? He wrote 2. One of em he go's on and on about "P"
Post Reply