Page 1 of 2
Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 05:50
by Foggy
Not a regular poster on here but seriously wont be any more due to not having much net access so want to get a mag to satisfy my boxing needs

.
In WH Smith I saw Boxing Monthly & The ring Magazine.........which out of experience is the better mag to get (better read)?
Much appreciated
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 05:56
by banjo
Boxing Monthly by a long way.
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 06:03
by Deserter
banjo wrote:Boxing Monthly by a long way.
x2. no comparison.
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 07:03
by JamesH
Deserter wrote:banjo wrote:Boxing Monthly by a long way.
x2. no comparison.
Agree 100%
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 07:13
by deadpan
The Ring is like Colin Hart. Reliant on former glories and behind the times.
Boxing Monthly is a cracking read.
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 07:26
by Coco
Boxing News is still the best mag by far
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 07:53
by Srebmun
Boxing Monthly defo' out of those 2, always some good reading. But Boxing News is the best.
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 08:07
by whiskey
The Ring is usually about 5 months behind everyone else.
Whilst it's features are often interesting, by the time it hits the shelves it's not as relevant as the British mags.
Surely there are other American mags other than the Ring ?
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 09:37
by whatashambles
G0mez wrote:The Ring is usually about 5 months behind everyone else.
Whilst it's features are often interesting, by the time it hits the shelves it's not as relevant as the British mags.
Surely there are other American mags other than the Ring ?
Boxing Digest, but it's poor
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 09:42
by 15829
easily boxing monthly i used to get the ring but stopped
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 09:51
by hitman_hatton1
ring is a decent read.
agree that the monthly is better.
some good pieces in the ring though.
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 09:54
by Poncey
JamesH wrote:Deserter wrote:banjo wrote:Boxing Monthly by a long way.
x2. no comparison.
Agree 100%
x4
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 13:49
by Flump
The thing I don't like about The Ring these days is that they have a more British tailored issue printed as well, personally if I buy a U.S magazine, I want their perspective on ours and their fighters, not a lot of the writing being done by a UK based reporter.
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 14:52
by yiddo14
Monthly is better, clearly.
Boxing News is the best though. By a long way.

Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 15:00
by demolitiondaley
BM is better, Boxing News is a good read to!

Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 17:15
by Scouse Fight Fan
G0mez wrote:The Ring is usually about 5 months behind everyone else.
Whilst it's features are often interesting, by the time it hits the shelves it's not as relevant as the British mags.
Surely there are other American mags other than the Ring ?
Used to buy it from WH Smiths on the day they got it in, even with buying it on the day of release over here it had previews for fights in that had taken place a month previously. Its a decent read but it totally being out of date is very off putting.
I get Boxing News most weeks now. Good fight previews ang good interesting articles alongside.
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 17:20
by banger
boxing monthly is the best by far.

Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 17:41
by states
Agree with everyone, Boxing Monthly is better by far. I nip into WH Smith to read The Ring every now and again though.
But yeah, BN is better than both of them, IMO.
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 18:11
by banjo
states wrote:Agree with everyone, Boxing Monthly is better by far. I nip into WH Smith to read The Ring every now and again though.
But yeah, BN is better than both of them, IMO.
Please don't tell me you're one of those fuckers who stands in there reading the magazines?
I thought it was only women with their gossip rags and age 50+ men with their classic car magazines who did that

Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 18:27
by states
I'm not in there for hours!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Just have a quick flick through to see if it's worth buying. It generally isn't.
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 20:33
by Spud
Boxing News ahead of Boxing Monthly.
And Shaggy's articles on another site ahead of "Smoggie's" on this site!!!

Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 12 Mar 2010, 21:05
by Its..D.G!
Boxing News and Montly - can not miss an issue.

Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 13 Mar 2010, 03:33
by hurlock
boxing news is the best.
ive never really liked monthly allways abit light i feel.
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 13 Mar 2010, 11:17
by slipandmove
boxing monthly, always get boxing news for all the british action!
Re: Which is the better read?
Posted: 13 Mar 2010, 13:51
by winkveron
Boxing Monthly! I like the rankings section at the back, which I often refer to when watching Friday Fight Night for example.