BoxRec

danh wrote:barker the better middleweight of the bunch, moore wont win a world title at middleweight he isnt good enough at midd, macklin will also beat him if they ever box again.

Deno1986 wrote:Macklin, world champ in 2010

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:

Deno1986 wrote:Macklin, world champ in 2010

bloody hope so, matthew has always had the talent, and his last 3 performances have been outstanding. when is he next out? hopefully 1 more figth and a ibf title shot

terrdilk wrote:I picked moorsey although he hasn't boxed at the weight yet we all now how jamie fights an I think the extra 6 pound will make a massive difference an we will see a fresh new fighter come sat night. I didn't really notice hoe big he was up close how he used to make light middle puzzles me because he is massive testiment to how he lives for the game I think to shift the Amon of weight he does.

stujones wrote:Well some of those in the poll shouldn't really be considered.

I think the likes of Martin Murray and Craig McEwan should be considered above Eastman and Elcock. What about Duddy and Lee?

Well for me its Macklin for the moment.

Square Ring wrote:

stujones wrote:Well some of those in the poll shouldn't really be considered.

I think the likes of Martin Murray and Craig McEwan should be considered above Eastman and Elcock. What about Duddy and Lee?

Well for me its Macklin for the moment.

I agree to a point, Elcock is one that should not really be in there - but the other names are known by all and Eastman is 'Eastman' after all.

slapbangwhallop wrote:

Square Ring wrote:

stujones wrote:Well some of those in the poll shouldn't really be considered.

I think the likes of Martin Murray and Craig McEwan should be considered above Eastman and Elcock. What about Duddy and Lee?

Well for me its Macklin for the moment.

I agree to a point, Elcock is one that should not really be in there - but the other names are known by all and Eastman is 'Eastman' after all.

seen as you have included Macklin maybe you should have included Duddy and Lee as well - especially as Duddy has recently beaten Eastman.

Square Ring wrote:

slapbangwhallop wrote:

Square Ring wrote: I agree to a point, Elcock is one that should not really be in there - but the other names are known by all and Eastman is 'Eastman' after all.

seen as you have included Macklin maybe you should have included Duddy and Lee as well - especially as Duddy has recently beaten Eastman.

So limited he beat Eastman and is rated above Eastman, Elcock and Murray in the BoxRec ratings. Not visible in the UK? 6 of his last 8 fights have been in Europe, 6 of them in Ireland with two fights in Ireland in the last year - all available live and for free on RTE with a free and legal web cast and Lee is rated above the guy Barker is fighting for his European title. Lirva, it sounds like you just watch SKY's FNF for your boxing.


Possibly, but I think we all know Duddy is fairly limited..All the other names (Bar Elcock) are Top European/Fringe or World Class in the eyes of most and Lee is not really that visible in the UK.

slapbangwhallop wrote:

Square Ring wrote:

slapbangwhallop wrote: seen as you have included Macklin maybe you should have included Duddy and Lee as well - especially as Duddy has recently beaten Eastman.

So limited he beat Eastman and is rated above Eastman, Elcock and Murray in the BoxRec ratings. Not visible in the UK? 6 of his last 8 fights have been in Europe, 6 of them in Ireland with two fights in Ireland in the last year - all available live and for free on RTE with a free and legal web cast and Lee is rated above the guy Barker is fighting for his European title. Lirva, it sounds like you just watch SKY's FNF for your boxing.


Possibly, but I think we all know Duddy is fairly limited..All the other names (Bar Elcock) are Top European/Fringe or World Class in the eyes of most and Lee is not really that visible in the UK.

diggler wrote:barker for me he beats

lee
macklin
duddy
moore
murray