BoxRec

The WBC and its president-for-life, Jose Sulaiman, are nothing more than a bunch of greedy bullies whose recent actions illustrate my longstanding assessment to a tee.

As for the bullying nature of the organization, the WBC seems to think it runs boxing and that it can call the shots -- that it can force any fighter in its rankings or a holder of one its titles to bow down and kiss the ring whenever Sulaiman snaps his greedy little fingers.

Recently, Sulaiman sent a letter via e-mail to unified junior welterweight titleholder Devon Alexander. Copied on the letter, which I got a copy of, were WBC executive Mauricio Sulaiman (Jose's son and chief excuse maker), Don King (Alexander's promoter), and Dana Jamison (King's top lieutenant).

Was it a letter congratulating Alexander on his outstanding knockout win against Juan Urango to unify titles March 6? No.

Was it a letter complimenting Alexander for being a role model, a credit to boxing and one of the most humble, respectful young men you will ever meet? Nope.

Instead it was a letter threatening Alexander's status as WBC 140-pound titleholder. Alexander's transgression? He had the audacity to say that he would like to face WBO titleholder Timothy Bradley Jr., whom many regard as the best junior welterweight in the world not named Devon Alexander.

In his letter, Sulaiman wrote, "I read today in the papers that you want to fight Timothy Bradley for the WBO championship. I appreciate the information and I kindly ask you to immediately present the resignation to the WBC championship, as it seems that our organization is not up to your stature as a boxer. The WBC green and gold belt has been the dream of many boxers in the world, but apparently it is not yours. I will be waiting for your resignation and may you have good luck in your fight."

Have you ever read something so arrogant and, frankly, delusional in your life? Let me see if I have this straight: Alexander, one of the finest fighters in the world, wants to fight another top fighter and Sulaiman takes offense? Let me tell you what I take offense to: that Sulaiman tarnishes boxing on almost a daily basis with his nonsense and by regularly forcing terrible mandatory fights and working against great matchups, like a Bradley-Alexander fight would be. Who the hell does he think he is?

Kevin Cunningham, Alexander's manager and underrated trainer, was about as stunned as I was when he read the garbage from Sulaiman.

"Devon is calling out Bradley because Bradley and Devon are considered the two best junior welterweights in the world and because that's the fight fans want to see to determine who is the best junior welterweight in the world," said Cunningham, who was disgusted by the letter and said Alexander has no intention of giving up his title.

If the WBC wants the belt back, it will have to strip Alexander and then prepare for a lawsuit. I actually hope the WBC goes for it and strips Alexander, because he would win his lawsuit and hopefully put the miserable organization out of business once and for all.

The Sulaimans did not respond to a request through their publicist for a comment.

"I've never heard of anything like this in my 45 years of living -- that a sanctioning body would want to strip its champion because he wants to fight of the best fighters out there," Cunningham said. "It's not like we are trying to avoid a mandatory. We have no problem making our mandatory when it is due. To get a letter like this is insane. How do you tell a guy to resign his title when he did nothing wrong? This sanctioning body is asking the kid to resign his title because he said he wants to fight the best guys out there? Are you [expletive] kidding me?"

I wish Sulaiman was.

Now onto the topic of the WBC's blatant and unending greed. I laughed out loud when I read a missive from Sulaiman expressing "concern" for the way sanctioning bodies use interim titles "when they should be used strictly when a champion leaves a title inactive for medical or legal problems."

The WBC, of course, is historically the worst offender in the business this side of the WBA when it comes to approving interim belts for no apparent reason. However, Sulaiman forgot to mention that he is responsible for the WBC's insane reliance on interim belts as a revenue stream.

In any event, Sulaiman said he would recommend to his puppet group of WBC governors at the annual convention in November that they institute the WBC "silver title," which would be a "substitution of an interim championship that does not represent a real title, when it is approved only for a fight without real significance."

In other words, every fight should have some dumb belt attached to it because he thinks it somehow helps the sport. Of course, the real reason is so Sulaiman can use the fees to line the WBC coffers and his own bank account because there are too many promoters, managers and fighters out there who want to keep Sulaiman happy, so they go along with what is, in essence, extortion.

I loved how Sulaiman tried to justify the invention of another bogus title by saying "ways must be found to keep the interest of boxing fans in the world, who are depending on reform that the WBC has been doing for three decades."

What an absolute joke. The WBC, with so many reprehensible rulings, worthless forced mandatory fights and numerous approved mismatches, is responsible for much of boxing's downfall over the past two decades. Adding a silver belt, like it tried to add the diamond belt for catch weight fights, is more of the same old money grab.

Here's an idea for Sulaiman, one which I will give him for free and not charge a sanction fee: How about he strip Alexander, offer him a silver belt replacement and then crawl under a rock.

stujones wrote:Well sadly Ali, Cunnigham is wrong that it is not uncommon. In his 45 years in boxing he has surely seen/heard of similar decision. You only have to look at Tim Bradley himself - forced to ditch the WBC belt he won so brilliantly away from home against Junior Witter.

I don't know if Bradley had a similar letter....... the tone of which was disgusting - but had a similar decision made. He chose to fight one of the best Light Welters out there and got stripped in the process.

I wonder if it is because it is Bradley why Sulliman has written such a nasty letter to Alexander.

It is whats wrong with boxing - but sadly, its not the first and it won't be the last.

Baboon wrote:How dare Devon Alexander try to fight the best out there. I would much rather he took on no 1 contender, the mighty Ionut Dan Ion....but only if Ionut can battle his way past that household name Andre Marcos Nascimento first........

diggler wrote:belts arnt important anymore, everyone knows who the best fighter is in each divison regardless of who the champiopns are

DIRT SUGAR wrote:Surely Carl Froch should have been sent a similar letter for having the audacity to fight in the Super Six then?

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:It's good to see everything I've been banging on about for years out there plain and simple.

The boards are ALL terrible and the proliferation of them is THE SINGLE WORST AND MOST DAMAGING thing to the sport.

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:There's a rather embarrassing exchange of letters between Alexander and Sulaiman over at Boxing Scene.

stujones wrote:WBC are not treating Ray Austin much better. Okay, personally don't want him near a world title fight again - but he has won a series of decent fights and kind of earned his #1 ranking. Now, for some bizarre reason he's been eliminated from the WBC rankings and there is going to be an eliminator which will not include him.

He plans to sue.