Khan - Malignaggi on ITV1?
Posted: 09 Apr 2010, 12:47
A mate in the know tells me the rumours are true
if this is true i will drink my own urine!!!!!!bfchunk wrote:Live at around 1 a.m.
I have to agree, people like Mitchell and Barker are undoubtably popular but not enough to be in must see boxing events.rob12344 wrote:Begs the question, will mitchell vs katsidis be SBO? I don't think it can be without Khan.
In saying that, I would probably buy it if it was, but it would set a worrying trend if it was.
Brillant, just brillant.overhand_right wrote:LOL you fools believe this just because 'my mate in the know told me so'?
How many times over the years has an obscure poster assured us a fight would be on terrestrial TV because 'someone who definitely knows sez so'
Pure trollocks.
Hey I coined that just now, it's mine. I can see it catching on. Trollocks (c). Hell yeah.
overhand_right wrote:LOL you fools believe this just because 'my mate in the know told me so'?
How many times over the years has an obscure poster assured us a fight would be on terrestrial TV because 'someone who definitely knows sez so'
Pure trollocks.
Hey I coined that just now, it's mine. I can see it catching on. Trollocks (c). Hell yeah.
Overhand_right you can't copyright Trollocks pal, I'm not saying you didn't think of it but someone thought of it a long time before you. As long ago as 2004overhand_right wrote:LOL you fools believe this just because 'my mate in the know told me so'?
How many times over the years has an obscure poster assured us a fight would be on terrestrial TV because 'someone who definitely knows sez so'
Pure trollocks.
Hey I coined that just now, it's mine. I can see it catching on. Trollocks (c). Hell yeah.
I look stupid now for praising him.demolitiondaley wrote:Overhand_right you can't copyright Trollocks pal, I'm not saying you didn't think of it but someone thought of it a long time before you. As long ago as 2004overhand_right wrote:LOL you fools believe this just because 'my mate in the know told me so'?
How many times over the years has an obscure poster assured us a fight would be on terrestrial TV because 'someone who definitely knows sez so'
Pure trollocks.
Hey I coined that just now, it's mine. I can see it catching on. Trollocks (c). Hell yeah.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... =Trollocks
Thats the wonders of Google my friend 8)Deno1986 wrote:I look stupid now for praising him.demolitiondaley wrote:Overhand_right you can't copyright Trollocks pal, I'm not saying you didn't think of it but someone thought of it a long time before you. As long ago as 2004overhand_right wrote:LOL you fools believe this just because 'my mate in the know told me so'?
How many times over the years has an obscure poster assured us a fight would be on terrestrial TV because 'someone who definitely knows sez so'
Pure trollocks.
Hey I coined that just now, it's mine. I can see it catching on. Trollocks (c). Hell yeah.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... =Trollocks
Oh right. Certainly makes more sense. Good spot fella.
someone else spotted it on another thread... cant take the 'credit' for this findIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Oh right. Certainly makes more sense. Good spot fella.
x2. Don't take skybet as a given people. Skytext is much more up-to-date and usually right, often telling you FFN main events before the BBBoC tell you what title fights are happening in their monthly update thing..states wrote:I wouldn't be so sure that it's on sky box office. That link is only to skybet, and they had the Box Office logo up for Pacquiao-Clottey, which caused some confusion on here a few weeks ago. Sky haven't had any adverts on TV about Khan-Malignaggi being on ppv, which would be strange, given how much they build up their ppv fights. There's also no mention of it on the sky website.
And finally, whilst not claiming to be 'in the know' myself, Alan Hubbard of the Independent on Sunday claimed in one of his columns a couple of weeks ago that Golden Boy were offering ITV the fight for nothing. Make of that what you will.