Page 1 of 2
Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 10:41
by Chris W 1982
Reading in Boxing News that Tony Quigley has been nominated to face Kenny Anderson in an eliminator for the British Title.
Has Dilks pulled out so he can challenge Groves?????
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 10:44
by Counter-puncher
Anderson's had first dibs at the shot for a while, can't speak for why Quigley's got it.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 10:46
by Chris W 1982
Anderson's been in the position for what seems like a lifetime. I was under the impression that Quigley was going to be campaigning at Middleweight
Surprised Dilks has removed himself from the running for a British crack. A shot at Smith in front of the Echo Arena crowd is surely more lucrative then facing Groves for the Commonwealth.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 10:49
by Counter-puncher
it seems like Paul David has been pulling out of fights with Anderson for at least a year....
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 10:51
by Chris W 1982
David's been nominated to face Tony Dodson for the English title.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 11:19
by Alba
i heard that Dilks rejected thefight .Paul david pulled out twiuce ,so kenny really should have been made mandatory tbh ,but he will face dodson now .
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 11:55
by kevinmaree
Yep Kenny will fight Quigley next in a final eliminator.
Dilks will fight groves from what i believe
Its a fight we are really looking forward to, exciting times in the supermiddleweight division
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 11:55
by 15829
quigley will be to strong for anderson
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 12:10
by terrdilk
First I ave heard here boy I never pulled out of anything to my knowlage
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 12:14
by Chris W 1982
terrdilk wrote:First I ave heard here boy I never pulled out of anything to my knowlage
Just going from what I read in Boxing News this morning mate.
All the Board news is in there
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 12:51
by terrdilk
Alba wrote:i heard that Dilks rejected thefight .Paul david pulled out twiuce ,so kenny really should have been made mandatory tbh ,but he will face dodson now .
Mate iv rejected no fight with Anderson mate so who ever told u it telling tom peppers
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 17:30
by hurlock
quigley lost his title in a controversial decision,which lead to fw even grabbing the mic to announce a rematch.when does he do that :!:as for anderson he's been in line for a while & david who's been crying out he's been ducked etc has pulled out on many occasions.
dilks is further down the pecking order, & has challenged groves before the adamu fight, not sure if he'll still want it.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 18:06
by terrdilk
hurlock wrote:quigley lost his title in a controversial decision,which lead to fw even grabbing the mic to announce a rematch.when does he do that :!:as for anderson he's been in line for a while & david who's been crying out he's been ducked etc has pulled out on many occasions.
dilks is further down the pecking order, & has challenged groves before the adamu fight, not sure if he'll still want it.
Come on mate of course I still want it mate I'm ready an waiting for the date
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 18:23
by hurlock
ok
DD good to hear :!: styles make fights.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 17 Apr 2010, 04:55
by Jeff Thomas
diggler wrote:quigley will be to strong for anderson
Belter, lets see.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 17 Apr 2010, 13:31
by billy nelson
imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 17 Apr 2010, 13:46
by 15829
billy nelson wrote:imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
quigley can always drop down to middleweight
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 17 Apr 2010, 13:50
by hurlock
billy nelson wrote:imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
anderson is undefeated??? quigley lost to a very good fighter in cleverley & a close contested one to smith :!:
consider there career's :!: comments like this are pathetic.the two fighters in question are great too watch.why should we lose a fighter because they sufferd a loss
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 17 Apr 2010, 13:54
by 15829
plus everyone knows he had no buisness being anywhere near a boxing ring against cleverly
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 18 Apr 2010, 06:13
by billy nelson
Alba wrote:i heard that Dilks rejected thefight .Paul david pulled out twiuce ,so kenny really should have been made mandatory tbh ,but he will face dodson now .
i think the board have done the correct thing in making a final eliminator coz quigley gave smith a hard fight and deserves another shot if he beats anderson.this will be a very good fight with quigley very busy and anderson possesing his power
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 18 Apr 2010, 11:46
by billy nelson
hurlock wrote:billy nelson wrote:imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
anderson is undefeated??? quigley lost to a very good fighter in cleverley & a close contested one to smith :!:
consider there career's :!: comments like this are pathetic.the two fighters in question are great too watch.why should we lose a fighter because they sufferd a loss
simply because neither of these two guys are going to beat the likes of james degale imo if and when they were to meet,so you tell me were the loser of this contest can go?
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 19 Apr 2010, 10:58
by Alba
billy nelson wrote:hurlock wrote:billy nelson wrote:imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
anderson is undefeated??? quigley lost to a very good fighter in cleverley & a close contested one to smith :!:
consider there career's :!: comments like this are pathetic.the two fighters in question are great too watch.why should we lose a fighter because they sufferd a loss
simply because neither of these two guys are going to beat the likes of james degale imo if and when they were to meet,so you tell me were the loser of this contest can go?
you dont think kenny anderson could beat degale ?
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 19 Apr 2010, 13:02
by billy nelson
Alba wrote:billy nelson wrote:hurlock wrote:
anderson is undefeated??? quigley lost to a very good fighter in cleverley & a close contested one to smith :!:
consider there career's :!: comments like this are pathetic.the two fighters in question are great too watch.why should we lose a fighter because they sufferd a loss
simply because neither of these two guys are going to beat the likes of james degale imo if and when they were to meet,so you tell me were the loser of this contest can go?
i think james could have to much for kenny,although if kenny connects properly its goodnight dick!
you dont think kenny anderson could beat degale ?
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 19 Apr 2010, 15:37
by Neri
billy nelson wrote:hurlock wrote:billy nelson wrote:imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
anderson is undefeated??? quigley lost to a very good fighter in cleverley & a close contested one to smith :!:
consider there career's :!: comments like this are pathetic.the two fighters in question are great too watch.why should we lose a fighter because they sufferd a loss
simply because neither of these two guys are going to beat the likes of james degale imo if and when they were to meet,so you tell me were the loser of this contest can go?
Quigley can drop back down to middleweight, his natural weight and Anderson can get involved in fights with David, Dodson and Dilks and make another run at some titles. I really don't believe that a couple of losses should end your career. Look at some of the records of fighters in old times and they are littered with losses, although admittedly they fought more often.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Posted: 19 Apr 2010, 15:46
by hurlock
losing means nothing,depending on the fashion of the loss & what effect it has on the fighters health.apart from that there are some really close & good contest's in this division.