Page 1 of 1
BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 15:33
by BoxBuzz
He's always up to some deviousness, either drafting the best to fight his way to the top, using brilliant strategery to wile his way past the good people, or paying someone under the table to make it appear that he is somehow just as good as anyone else. Or worst of all going by the rules as they have been stated. None of these actions are anything to be proud of.
Is it time for him to go? Shall he roam these halls No more? We don't want "his kind" 'round these parts?
Or is he a "Maverick", a briliiant guidesmith? "One of a kind smart fella"? An inspiration to all?
You decide!
If the vote goes the wrong way, I'll retire. I'm older than any three of you put together anyway. If not, you'll get more chances to have your guys beaten to smithereens via my mysitical far east specialized training methods, combined with the ancient old fashioned GBP Yankee, can do, common sense.
Remember you can participate vs a GBP fighter, but you can't really compete with them.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 16:06
by SAV
is this an attempt at sympathy buzz? fvck no you shouldnt retire. you should, however show some sac and stop ducking every challenge thrown your way.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 16:08
by jBacca
Yes, display balls.

Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 16:16
by SAV
jBacca wrote:Yes, display balls.


Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 16:38
by BoxBuzz
Our great fighter Max deserves and will receive a tune up fight for the finale. If there were balls around here Moore would be facing the #1 challenger this week, and this would be put to bed. However due to lack of balls, our fighter gets an easy one, and then Moore or the champion must face the #1 contender which may or may not be Max.
It's just the way it is. It's not always fair. Learn to cope.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 16:43
by jBacca
If there were balls around here, Slapsie would have fought Tunney in weeks 1 through to 38.
It's just the way it is. It's not always fair. I learned to cope.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 18:48
by Marlin
I vote Buzz as the best manager in the Sim, the very fabric of SimSociety would crumble without him.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 19:25
by BoxBuzz
jBacca wrote:If there were balls around here, Slapsie would have fought Tunney in weeks 1 through to 38.
It's just the way it is. It's not always fair. I learned to cope.
Now there you go....There goes a feller who has learned to deal with lifes ups and downs, the good the bad and the ugly, and does not require a feminine napkin to deal with it.
Now if Max were champion, he would face Tunney, just as we mentioned from the git go. We just don't think a HW champ has much business here. Nothing personal, we feel the same about Tommy Burns and Jimmy Braddock.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 19:34
by jBacca
BoxBuzz wrote:jBacca wrote:If there were balls around here, Slapsie would have fought Tunney in weeks 1 through to 38.
It's just the way it is. It's not always fair. I learned to cope.
Now there you go....There goes a feller who has learned to deal with lifes ups and downs, the good the bad and the ugly, and does not require a feminine napkin to deal with it.
Now if Max were champion, he would face Tunney, just as we mentioned from the git go. We just don't think a HW champ has much business here. Nothing personal, we feel the same about Tommy Burns and Jimmy Braddock.
Buzz, you can throw that one out all you like, but you know that Tunney largely campaigned at LHW and only fought a few at HW.
You're now dubbed 'the Running Man', or ...

Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 19:43
by BoxBuzz
By the way when it was needed, Max beat both Braddock and Burns. Tunney? Just another notch on the ol' unified belts.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 19:49
by jBacca
Buzz, if Tunney loses against Moore, he wants Possumbloom or Foster. Do not run.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 20:02
by BoxBuzz
jBacca wrote:Buzz, if Tunney loses against Moore, he wants Possumbloom or Foster. Do not run.
Tunney will not lose, and then he will be forced to deal with the #1 contender....and that is a simulated fact.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 20:04
by SAV
BoxBuzz wrote:jBacca wrote:Buzz, if Tunney loses against Moore, he wants Possumbloom or Foster. Do not run.
Tunney will not lose, and then he will be forced to deal with the #1 contender....and that is a simulated fact.
sorry jbacca, but buzz is like 1 for 20 when picking against sav this season.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 20:06
by BoxBuzz
SAV wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:jBacca wrote:Buzz, if Tunney loses against Moore, he wants Possumbloom or Foster. Do not run.
Tunney will not lose, and then he will be forced to deal with the #1 contender....and that is a simulated fact.
sorry jbacca, but buzz is like 1 for 20 when picking against sav this season.
so logic would dictate I'm due for that second time....right?
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 20:55
by SAV
BoxBuzz wrote:SAV wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:
Tunney will not lose, and then he will be forced to deal with the #1 contender....and that is a simulated fact.
sorry jbacca, but buzz is like 1 for 20 when picking against sav this season.
so logic would dictate I'm due for that second time....right?
logic would dictate that its a 1 in 20 shot of getting it right
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 21:09
by BoxBuzz
SAV wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:SAV wrote:
sorry jbacca, but buzz is like 1 for 20 when picking against sav this season.
so logic would dictate I'm due for that second time....right?
logic would dictate that its a 1 in 20 shot of getting it right
So I'm due!
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 21:15
by SAV
BoxBuzz wrote:SAV wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:
so logic would dictate I'm due for that second time....right?
logic would dictate that its a 1 in 20 shot of getting it right
So I'm due!
No. considering that 1 shot was only a few fights ago when maxi-pad paid off the judges and took the title from fox by 1 point.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 28 Apr 2010, 21:20
by BoxBuzz
a miss is as good as a mile. You have to admit, Max's software is unique.....he's like the energizer bunny who can't hurt you, can't be hurt and is just happy as hell to be in a fight. He really hasn't been in a blow out either way. He's like a damn mirror SAV.....and it appears that many don't like what they see in that mirror.
Present company excluded of course.
He fights Eric Crumble to a close UD and TJF the same. He's one of a kind that Max!
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 29 Apr 2010, 17:00
by Crease
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 30 Apr 2010, 11:54
by BoxBuzz
Championship after Championship after Championship....is pure, 100% effective and highly potent "action" son.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 30 Apr 2010, 13:30
by kevo
Round our ways, we'd refer to you as a "shit 'ouse"
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 01 May 2010, 18:49
by BoxBuzz
kevo wrote:Round our ways, we'd refer to you as a "shit 'ouse"
nah, I'm just the guy who doesn't want to face my own #1 draft pick in the last reel of the film.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Posted: 05 May 2010, 09:35
by Sweet P
Marlin wrote:I vote Buzz as the best manager in the Sim, the very fabric of SimSociety would crumble without him.
I agree