Page 1 of 1

katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 02 May 2010, 02:21
by philthy
does anyone know if this will be televised because it is free on sky sports in uk

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 02 May 2010, 05:49
by Brute
It is on Main Event.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 02 May 2010, 09:11
by Hounddawg
Brute wrote:It is on Main Event.

What time mate and how much?

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 02 May 2010, 16:24
by Asterix
Hounddawg wrote:
Brute wrote:It is on Main Event.

What time mate and how much?
The prices are here: http://www.mainevent.com.au/event.asp?id=814

Subscribers the event will cost;
FOXTEL - $29.95 inc. GST
OPTUS - $29.95 inc. GST
AUSTAR - $49.95 inc. GST

It's got the time on there as well. 5AM, but I don't know which time zone that is. Hopefully you will.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 03 May 2010, 03:46
by Brute
5am Eastern Standard Time (Australian).

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 08 May 2010, 19:11
by Tinnie
LOL @ the promotional poster

Image


one of the stranger ones i've seen!

Between his mouth and that photo Mitchell isnt coming across as the sharpest tool in the shed :lol: :lol:

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 08 May 2010, 19:45
by Asterix
Bigger image here:

Image

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 09 May 2010, 18:38
by Marlin
^ fewer

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 09 May 2010, 18:49
by Brute
So allegedly cannot tell an ancient Greek helmet from an ancient Roman helmet?

Looks like the election is not the only thing confusing the English.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 14 May 2010, 07:59
by Poncey
For those that are good at math(s), Kev's ring walk is 22:00 here. Fight starts at 22:15.

Weather permitting.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 14 May 2010, 08:38
by Asterix
Poncey wrote:For those that are good at math(s), Kev's ring walk is 22:00 here. Fight starts at 22:15.

Weather permitting.
7 AM on Saturday morning in Sydney, if my maths is correct.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 14 May 2010, 11:40
by Datsue
Brute wrote:So allegedly cannot tell an ancient Greek helmet from an ancient Roman helmet?

How's a poor promoter to tell the difference between a Corinthian & a Galea?

& anyway, I always thought that Michael "The Hoplite" Katsidis had a bit of a cool ring to it, meself...

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 14 May 2010, 14:05
by Asterix

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 14 May 2010, 18:53
by toppity
i want Kat to win for more than one reason. But i have to admit that right up there, towards to top of the list, is being able to enter the british forum and state that "as usual you blokes over-rate all your fighters....etc...etc". I just hope we beat them in the cricket as well. However, if it goes the other way, I might stay away from here for a couple of days.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 14 May 2010, 19:04
by toppity
sg1985 wrote:
Asterix wrote:Bigger image here:

Image
Am I the only one who finds this poster arousing? :wink:
No. I reckon both you and your mate Micheal Jackson would....if only the pado' was still alive to comment.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 14 May 2010, 19:36
by Asterix
toppity wrote:i want Kat to win for more than one reason. But i have to admit that right up there, towards to top of the list, is being able to enter the british forum and state that "as usual you blokes over-rate all your fighters....etc...etc". I just hope we beat them in the cricket as well. However, if it goes the other way, I might stay away from here for a couple of days.
Cheeky. :P

I'm finding myself unable to call a winner for this. Katsidis is bigger, probably stronger, has a brilliant work rate and plenty of stamina to boot. Mitchell is faster, more fluid, more awkward and *I think* more skilful. Both can punch, both can take a punch, both are very tough.

Mitchell showed real quality against Prescott, and I think could take it up another level, which he'll need to, as Katsidis is a level above Prescott.

I can't wait for the fight. It's going to be really good no matter who wins. Both boxers seem like really nice people, as well.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 15 May 2010, 03:19
by Brute
What were those turds chanting?

"There's only one Kevin Mitchell?" How many do they want? Only one can get in the ring.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 15 May 2010, 15:14
by Datsue
I hope Katsidis wins tonight -- he's a brave brave boy & I've seen him fight live before versus Earl.

I love his fight-anyone attitude & the fact that he left his country to fight the top boys in his division. Plus, I know for a fact that should he win, he'll be back in with a top Mexican/Yank within six months. He's just that sort of bloke.

Good luck Michael, from someone in the UK.

PS: Toppo, can you not just PM oliverfennel rather than do that in the British forum? I'm sure he'd appreciate it.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 15 May 2010, 15:35
by Poncey
Doesn't look like any Aussie fans here. No flags. Nowt. Surprising.

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 15 May 2010, 15:45
by Brute
Datsue wrote:
Brute wrote:So allegedly cannot tell an ancient Greek helmet from an ancient Roman helmet?

How's a poor promoter to tell the difference between a Corinthian & a Galea?

& anyway, I always thought that Michael "The Hoplite" Katsidis had a bit of a cool ring to it, meself...
Obviously he did not have a "Newnes Pictorial Knowledge" children's encyclopedia that was around in the '50s. All of that stuff was in them. They were published in England. :lol:

Re: katsidis v mitchell

Posted: 15 May 2010, 17:14
by crusader
Spoiler

















Awesome victory from Katsidis!!!!!! Mitchell was overated all along, who had he fought. What a win!