who was the better attacker duran, tzsyu or JCC?
Posted: 04 Jun 2010, 08:35
as in not just throwing punches blindly but at cutting off the ring etc
i edited it oncehitman09 wrote:Stop editing your damn threads!!
And you deleted a post on the other thread. Make up your mind before you post.Adamj1987 wrote:i edited it oncehitman09 wrote:Stop editing your damn threads!!
i deleted that post because i said for you to check teh sweetpea-floyd thread and by time it had gone on you posted on that thread making my posta mute pointhitman09 wrote:And you deleted a post on the other thread. Make up your mind before you post.Adamj1987 wrote:i edited it oncehitman09 wrote:Stop editing your damn threads!!
hitman09 wrote:Who voted Chavez? Does his son post here?
Duran wins the tourney, but is sorry he did when he runs into Armstrong. Together, they bring the house down, but that fight can only have one winner.actjac wrote:Great tournament:
Duran
Tzsyu
Chavez
Pacquiao
winner to fight Henry Armstrong
Depends on the weight. At LW, I'd take Duran.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Duran wins the tourney, but is sorry he did when he runs into Armstrong. Together, they bring the house down, but that fight can only have one winner.actjac wrote:Great tournament:
Duran
Tzsyu
Chavez
Pacquiao
winner to fight Henry Armstrong
At LW I take Armstrong, and at Welter I take Duran. I think many people don't realize that Armstrong was fighting welters when he really belong at LW. I kind of agree with Goodnight, Irene in a sense that Duran is kind of over-rated at LW.hitman09 wrote:Depends on the weight. At LW, I'd take Duran.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Duran wins the tourney, but is sorry he did when he runs into Armstrong. Together, they bring the house down, but that fight can only have one winner.actjac wrote:Great tournament:
Duran
Tzsyu
Chavez
Pacquiao
winner to fight Henry Armstrong
Duran was worse at Welter than at Lightweight, while Armstrong wasn't, at least not noticeably IMO. Though Armstrong was a Jr. Welter for most of his WW fights, I still think Duran at WW didn't handle it as well.Idisagree wrote:At LW I take Armstrong, and at Welter I take Duran. I think many people don't realize that Armstrong was fighting welters when he really belong at LW. I kind of agree with Goodnight, Irene in a sense that Duran is kind of over-rated at LW.hitman09 wrote:Depends on the weight. At LW, I'd take Duran.Goodnight, Irene wrote: Duran wins the tourney, but is sorry he did when he runs into Armstrong. Together, they bring the house down, but that fight can only have one winner.
The Duran that defeated SRL would have have defeated Armstrong that night too in my opinion.hitman09 wrote:Duran was worse at Welter than at Lightweight, while Armstrong wasn't, at least not noticeably IMO. Though Armstrong was a Jr. Welter for most of his WW fights, I still think Duran at WW didn't handle it as well.Idisagree wrote:At LW I take Armstrong, and at Welter I take Duran. I think many people don't realize that Armstrong was fighting welters when he really belong at LW. I kind of agree with Goodnight, Irene in a sense that Duran is kind of over-rated at LW.hitman09 wrote: Depends on the weight. At LW, I'd take Duran.
Sorry but would like to hear how many would rank ahead of Duran in that department. Because from where I stand there are not that many. Duran is one of the few with the emphasis in few that imo were the complete package in the offense department. For instance, Ali was complete package, but offensively I rank Duran ahead of Ali and that is just one example. The main reason of why many consider Duran a top 10 p4p is because of his offensive skills.glittermonkey wrote:Other would be the right pick. There have been tons of fighters that eclipse Duran offensively. Tons.
From those named in the poll, he's out in front though. Easily, too.
Agreed, and it would take nothing away from hank's brilliance when Duran beat him.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Duran wins the tourney, but is sorry he did when he runs into Armstrong. Together, they bring the house down, but that fight can only have one winner.actjac wrote:Great tournament:
Duran
Tzsyu
Chavez
Pacquiao
winner to fight Henry Armstrong
Quite the opposite for me. Most people rank Duran so high from a P4P aspect because of his defense. No doubt he was a complete offensive fighter, but his ability to press the fight and still slip punches is what made him one of a kind.Idisagree wrote:Sorry but would like to hear how many would rank ahead of Duran in that department. Because from where I stand there are not that many. Duran is one of the few with the emphasis in few that imo were the complete package in the offense department. For instance, Ali was complete package, but offensively I rank Duran ahead of Ali and that is just one example. The main reason of why many consider Duran a top 10 p4p is because of his offensive skills.glittermonkey wrote:Other would be the right pick. There have been tons of fighters that eclipse Duran offensively. Tons.
From those named in the poll, he's out in front though. Easily, too.
I would agree that his defense is often way under-rated. In a way he used his defense to set up his offense. However, I think his offense carry him slightly more than his defense. His ability to slip punches wouldn't be as effective without having the ability to inflict damage with his counter punching ability (offensive skills). When it comes to defense he should be ranked among the best, but so is his offensive skills. That is why Duran is the complete package in my honest opinion.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Quite the opposite for me. Most people rank Duran so high from a P4P aspect because of his defense. No doubt he was a complete offensive fighter, but his ability to press the fight and still slip punches is what made him one of a kind.Idisagree wrote:Sorry but would like to hear how many would rank ahead of Duran in that department. Because from where I stand there are not that many. Duran is one of the few with the emphasis in few that imo were the complete package in the offense department. For instance, Ali was complete package, but offensively I rank Duran ahead of Ali and that is just one example. The main reason of why many consider Duran a top 10 p4p is because of his offensive skills.glittermonkey wrote:Other would be the right pick. There have been tons of fighters that eclipse Duran offensively. Tons.
From those named in the poll, he's out in front though. Easily, too.
Strictly speaking of offensive gifts there is Ray Robinson & Tommy Hearns, then the rest of history.