BoxRec

For me;

John Murray,
Frankie Gavin,
Kenny Anderson,
Carl Frampton,
Tyson Fury,
David Price

paul smith
stephen smith
tony bellew
kevin mitchell
darren barker

Carl Froch

MachoMan09 wrote:Floyd Mayweather
James Toney
Bernard Hopkins
Manny Pacquiao

Outside of Irish guys I would go for watchin these guys but also add Martinez as well

miguel cotto
manny pacquiao
carl froch

David Haye
Danny Williams
Carl Froch
Mathew Macklin
Darren Barker
Kell Brook
Floyd Mayweather
Pacman
Kevin Mitchell
Yuri Gamboa

mayweather
pacman
haye
both marquezs
khan
brook

1. Khan. By some considerable distance I must say

2. Mayweather

3. Pacman

David Haye - car crash TV - he is either knocking the guy out or coming apart himself - I know he has actually only lost once as a pro but you always get the feeling he is vunerable himself.

Enzo Macc - same reasons as David Haye.

Froch - fight with Kelseer was thrilling stuff.

Pacman = awesome fighting machine.

Mayweather - only too see if anyone can challenge his dominace - boring fighter really though - just winning all them unamonous decsions with his safety first skills.

Khan - to a lesser degree to the others though.

carl froch
kell brook
frankie gavin
nathan cleverly
jason booth
darren barker

Livingstone Cole wrote:

forcefraser wrote:Carl Froch

Why did that take three posts?
Froch, for all his technical flaws, is still the most exciting fighter on these shores.

So glad you wrote that as when I started scrolling down my jaw was dropping at the same rate. How can anyone not have Froch in there given his record to date and what's to come with King Arthur?

"Iron" Mike Tyson was the ultimate "must see" when I was younger watching boxing in the 1990's.

And I am sure most people would agree.

His release from prison - the farce against Mcneely and Seldon and Bruno and the dramtic Holyfield losses and the tremodous hype and anmosity in the Lennox Lewis build up =

But even against the likes of Frans Botha and CLifford Ettiene you couldnt miss a Tyson fight.

FLINT ISLAND wrote: But even against the likes of Frans Botha and CLifford Ettiene you couldnt miss a Tyson fight.

Sorry, but couldn't disagree more. Having watched him in his heyday I couldn't bear watching the shell of the man in 'action'.

Deserter wrote:

FLINT ISLAND wrote: But even against the likes of Frans Botha and CLifford Ettiene you couldnt miss a Tyson fight.

Sorry, but couldn't disagree more. Having watched him in his heyday I couldn't bear watching the shell of the man in 'action'.

Yep,i got up for Berbick,Smith,Thomas,Tucker,etc,but didnt even bother buying Ettiene.The interest Iron Mike created in the mid 80's was something else.

Cotto
Froch
Haye

Domestically

Jason Booth
Frankie Gavin
Tyson Fury
Rendall Munroe

To a lesser extent (will watch next morning)

Kessler
Khan
Katsidis
Guzman
Pacquiao
Pavlik
Williams

Micheal Katsidis

DougieC30 wrote:Micheal Katsidis

This so much!
Haye
Froch
Pacquiao
Wlad (like him or hate him he can be taken...and can take out anyone)
Benavidez (mainly because I want to find out if it's all hype)
Ji Hoon Kim
Wonjongkam (mainly because he's a legend, not his stye)
Gamboa
JuanMa

FLINT ISLAND wrote:"Iron" Mike Tyson was the ultimate "must see" when I was younger watching boxing in the 1990's.

And I am sure most people would agree.

His release from prison - the farce against Mcneely and Seldon and Bruno and the dramtic Holyfield losses and the tremodous hype and anmosity in the Lennox Lewis build up =

But even against the likes of Frans Botha and CLifford Ettiene you couldnt miss a Tyson fight.

totally agree with you here,mike tyson was the best attraction for 20 years in boxing loved waiting for his fights

mayweather
pacman
mosley
haye
froch
marquez
ryan rhodes
anyone who puts hopkins must love falling asleep while he is fighting,he is the most boring fighter of our generation