Week 17 zum zum ducks Arguello
Posted: 01 Jul 2010, 12:56
that is all.
What is it with you and giving away World Titles?BoxBuzz wrote:For the winner of week one MUST abdicate his titles to face the other in week two.
Okay, that is right... But Marquez won his fight, he successfully defended the IBF title...BoxBuzz wrote:It's the rules....a sitting ABC champ may not fight a fighter who just lost.
That statement of yours is not quite right now is it?Crease wrote:Okay, that is right... But Marquez won his fight, he successfully defended the IBF title...BoxBuzz wrote:It's the rules....a sitting ABC champ may not fight a fighter who just lost.
And still, could you please explain to me why you dropped the WBO title? :)
Actually my statement is perfectly accurate... Allow me to bring up the history of the IBF Championship.BoxBuzz wrote:That statement of yours is not quite right now is it?
You say that Nelson is greater than the WBO title... Then why did you not take a unification fight... History would have remembered you as the man who brough the WBO and IBF titles together...BoxBuzz wrote:Sometimes a man is too big for a belt. The reality of His vision and skill expand far beyond the ability of any trophy, title or belt to quantify or define that mystic nature that makes one a true champion.
And yet Sav called you out twice and you never agreed to the fight?BoxBuzz wrote:In this case Azumah has decided that Arguello should be given a trilogy in order to give him opportunity.
Buzz, you argue that True Champions are limited by the value of their title.BoxBuzz wrote: Such Champions transcend such limiting descriptors.
There's no "T" in champion either.BoxBuzz wrote:"MontAzumah".
We've just changed it from mountazumah. because we have discovered that there is no "U" in Champion.
Are they fighting this week or are they not, nothing has been signed.BoxBuzz wrote:I'm certain that Armstrong and Azumah will be the trilogy of the season.
Good.BoxBuzz wrote:It's signed