Page 1 of 1

Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 07 Jul 2010, 13:51
by deadpan
He's coming back, still has a statistically impressive record, is Irish and can claim to being the man who 'ends Tyson's careers'.

Who wins?

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 07 Jul 2010, 14:10
by slapbangwhallop
deadpan wrote:He's coming back, still has a statistically impressive record, is Irish and can claim to being the man who 'ends Tyson's careers'.

Who wins?
his old opponent just pulled out.

http://boxing-ireland.com/new_mcbride_foe_18.html

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 07 Jul 2010, 14:24
by chiggsy
Fury weathers the early storm and stops a completely exhausted larry o sometime around the midway point.

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 07 Jul 2010, 15:33
by Adamj1987
fury this would be a step down from mcdermot and wouldnt even be for the irish title as coleman barrett has that

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 07 Jul 2010, 17:06
by HomicideHenry
I think Fury would win it on points; McBride just hits hard and thats all he's got

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 07 Jul 2010, 17:51
by crusader
Fury by KO/TKO. McBride probably has nothing left and he was never that good to begin with. I think Fury can end matters early, McBride is very fragile and much, much, slower. Mike Mollo destroyed him in two rounds three years ago and I think Fury is good enough to stop him as well.

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 07 Jul 2010, 18:34
by slapbangwhallop
crusader wrote:Fury by KO/TKO. McBride probably has nothing left and he was never that good to begin with. I think Fury can end matters early, McBride is very fragile and much, much, slower. Mike Mollo destroyed him in two rounds three years ago and I think Fury is good enough to stop him as well.
+1

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 16:29
by funso banjo baby
im fairly sure the underrated Zach page will outwork Mcbride who is slow sooooooo slow.

watching Fury v mcbride might literally make us go back in time

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 16:37
by JamesH
funso banjo baby wrote:watching Fury v mcbride might literally make us go back in time
great line :lol: :lol:

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 09 Jul 2010, 21:02
by hayebomb
slapbangwhallop wrote:
crusader wrote:Fury by KO/TKO. McBride probably has nothing left and he was never that good to begin with. I think Fury can end matters early, McBride is very fragile and much, much, slower. Mike Mollo destroyed him in two rounds three years ago and I think Fury is good enough to stop him as well.
+1
x 2... just hope fury stays in the gym and gets in shape!!!! :box:

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 10 Jul 2010, 14:52
by Matt W
Heavyweight boxing is in a dire condition indeed if this proposed fight merits a thread. I'd rather pluck out my underarm hairs one-by-one than watch that.

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 11 Jul 2010, 00:29
by crusader
http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/early-r ... psie-52511


McBride lost a very wide decision to Zack Page. Although it was labeled an upset by the writer of the article, myself and really anyone familiar with Page expected this result. Funso banjo baby predicted Page would outwork McBride and it sounds like that is exactly what he did. Page is a top 100 fighter, despite his losing record.

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 11 Jul 2010, 02:07
by iamasadlittleboy
Pages last 9 fights have repeated the same 3 fight sequence 3 times
Lose-Lose-Win

Next guy to face Zack has to be pretty confident huh?>_>

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 11 Jul 2010, 05:27
by Exoddus
That's the end of McBride anyway.

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 11 Jul 2010, 05:57
by funso banjo baby
funso banjo baby wrote:im fairly sure the underrated Zach page will outwork Mcbride who is slow sooooooo slow.

watching Fury v mcbride might literally make us go back in time


good prediction by the baby :TU:

Re: Fury-McBride. Surely.

Posted: 11 Jul 2010, 06:22
by Old bones Ian
Said before that i'd like to see Zack Page over here testing our haevyweights,