BoxRec

Keeping it for marriage?

BIT OF ADVICE, STAY AWAY FROM THAT SKANKY HO BAG!

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/14 ... a-virgin-/

JUSCOOLNOMAN wrote:Keeping it for marriage?

BIT OF ADVICE, STAY AWAY FROM THAT SKANKY HO BAG!

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/14 ... a-virgin-/

Haha, BIT OF ADVICE, STAY AWAY FROM THAT SKANKY NEWSPAPER!

JamesH wrote:

JUSCOOLNOMAN wrote:Keeping it for marriage?

BIT OF ADVICE, STAY AWAY FROM THAT SKANKY HO BAG!

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/14 ... a-virgin-/

Haha, BIT OF ADVICE, STAY AWAY FROM THAT SKANKY NEWSPAPER!

Juscoolnoman!

I got it from another forum, I read the Guardian and the West Indian Gleaner!

Dunno why but I read the following paragraph

But the 23-year-old ring king told a boxing magazine that he was single and had never had sex.

as

But the 23-year-old ring king told a boxing magazine that he was single handed when he had sex.

23 years old and still a virgin :surprised: imagine what his ego will be like once he pops his cherry

What's wrong with him being a virgin? It's not as if he's got aids is it?

banjo wrote:What's wrong with him being a virgin? It's not as if he's got aids is it?

My only concern is that he wants Kim 'skanky biaatch' Kardishan!

JUSCOOLNOMAN wrote:

banjo wrote:What's wrong with him being a virgin? It's not as if he's got aids is it?

My only concern is that he wants Kim 'skanky biaatch' Kardishan!

Kim Kardashian is the hottest women in the world(apart from Mrs Banjo obviously) 8)

banjo wrote:

JUSCOOLNOMAN wrote:

banjo wrote:What's wrong with him being a virgin? It's not as if he's got aids is it?

My only concern is that he wants Kim 'skanky biaatch' Kardishan!

Kim Kardashian is the hottest women in the world(apart from Mrs Banjo obviously) 8)

But Kim has a video out of her sucking her boyfriends d--k - skanky bitch for putting that out there to get tv deals etc.

banjo wrote:What's wrong with him being a virgin? It's not as if he's got aids is it?

if you believe that you'll believe anything!

JUSCOOLNOMAN wrote:

banjo wrote:

JUSCOOLNOMAN wrote:
My only concern is that he wants Kim 'skanky biaatch' Kardishan!

Kim Kardashian is the hottest women in the world(apart from Mrs Banjo obviously) 8)

But Kim has a video out of her sucking her boyfriends d--k - skanky bitch for putting that out there to get tv deals etc.

so whats wrong with that!?!?

...so isn't he kinda admiting he's a tosser after all?

DEKKER87 wrote:

JUSCOOLNOMAN wrote:

banjo wrote: Kim Kardashian is the hottest women in the world(apart from Mrs Banjo obviously) 8)

But Kim has a video out of her sucking her boyfriends d--k - skanky bitch for putting that out there to get tv deals etc.

so whats wrong with that!?!?

True, I know you did it also.

DD

But be serious, do you think her dad is proud of that? On a lighter note, watch Mongrels on BBC3..


Its so funny.

1) Pigeon living in Amy Whinehouse hair calls council to complain about the woman downstairs from her...Why? Because Amy is a Donkey faced Crack Skank!

2) Pigeon always fancied going out with a crow - kisses teeth and says with fake West Indian accent 'mmmm - the darker meats'!

3) Cat dating a 3 week old kitten.. Pigeon says to him 'Congrats on you award for the film making in 2003...Mr Polansky!!!


As for s--king you bfs todger on video to get a tv show, thats wrong!

DD

Brieidis made him his girlfriend and broke him in.

If I was still single & a virgin I wouldnt have all these grey hairs thats a fact!

pyenest77 wrote:If I was still single & a virgin I wouldnt have all these grey hairs thats a fact!

The undermatched Amir Khan looks down to the winner of the world lightweight title clash between ageing Mexican Juan Manuel Marquez and Houston's beatable Juan Diaz for his next opponent on December 11 in the States, where Khan trains. Marquez and Diaz square up in Las Vegas at the end of the month.
Khan, the WBA light-welterweight champion, labels himself "a born fighter" and "in my prime" yet he conveniently and cynically overlooks the fact that he is not fighting a light-welter in December and that Diaz was licked by New York's light-hitting Paulie Malignaggi quite recently, who in turn was pounded by Khan in 11 rounds in Madison Sqaure Garden in May. Khan and his team really insult the game and its followers in December. The last opponent he bandied about was another small man in Cuba's Joel Casamayor, although the match failed to materialise. Forget his libido, there just has to be a serious problem with Khan's chin.

LOL Khan never even spoke to the Daily Star

bennie wrote: Khan, the WBA light-welterweight champion, labels himself "a born fighter" and "in my prime" yet he conveniently and cynically overlooks the fact that he is not fighting a light-welter in December and that Diaz was licked by New York's light-hitting Paulie Malignaggi quite recently, who in turn was pounded by Khan in 11 rounds in Madison Sqaure Garden in May. Khan and his team really insult the game and its followers in December. The last opponent he bandied about was another small man in Cuba's Joel Casamayor, although the match failed to materialise. Forget his libido, there just has to be a serious problem with Khan's chin.

I really couldn't agree more, Bennie.

terminator wrote:LOL Khan never even spoke to the Daily Star

The whole interview seems ripped word for word from the Haye magazine from last April?

bennie wrote:The undermatched Amir Khan looks down to the winner of the world lightweight title clash between ageing Mexican Juan Manuel Marquez and Houston's beatable Juan Diaz for his next opponent on December 11 in the States, where Khan trains. Marquez and Diaz square up in Las Vegas at the end of the month.
Khan, the WBA light-welterweight champion, labels himself "a born fighter" and "in my prime" yet he conveniently and cynically overlooks the fact that he is not fighting a light-welter in December and that Diaz was licked by New York's light-hitting Paulie Malignaggi quite recently, who in turn was pounded by Khan in 11 rounds in Madison Sqaure Garden in May. Khan and his team really insult the game and its followers in December. The last opponent he bandied about was another small man in Cuba's Joel Casamayor, although the match failed to materialise. Forget his libido, there just has to be a serious problem with Khan's chin.

yeah just heard abiut this and i wasn't surprised that after "having words" with his stateside promoters about punishing tim badley, he'll target instead the winner of the marquez-diaz rematch. a rivalry that has seriously gone out of fashio.

bennie wrote:The undermatched Amir Khan looks down to the winner of the world lightweight title clash between ageing Mexican Juan Manuel Marquez and Houston's beatable Juan Diaz for his next opponent on December 11 in the States, where Khan trains. Marquez and Diaz square up in Las Vegas at the end of the month.
Khan, the WBA light-welterweight champion, labels himself "a born fighter" and "in my prime" yet he conveniently and cynically overlooks the fact that he is not fighting a light-welter in December and that Diaz was licked by New York's light-hitting Paulie Malignaggi quite recently, who in turn was pounded by Khan in 11 rounds in Madison Sqaure Garden in May. Khan and his team really insult the game and its followers in December. The last opponent he bandied about was another small man in Cuba's Joel Casamayor, although the match failed to materialise. Forget his libido, there just has to be a serious problem with Khan's chin.

The thing is Bennie, you believe every bit of crap put out on this forum. What gives you the right to claim "Khan and his team really insult the game"?

As if, as a 22-year-old, facing Marquez is some terrible thing. Seems one rule for Khan one for everyone else.

I would be interested to see your opinion Witter v that Mexican he defended his title against. Obviously your opinions before the fights.

How about your opinion of Maidana v Corley? Why criticise Khan for wanting to fight Casamayor or Marquez, yet a fight like that comes along and Maidana is somehow some avoided fighter, even though he just backed out of a fight with Bradley?
And why do you believe that Khan is the obstacle to a Khan-Bradley/Alexander fight? You don't think for a minute that Gary Shaw/Don King would be asking for money that is way beyond anything being offered by the TV companies right now, do you? Maybe you believe that Khan should box for nothing?

gobbles wrote:

bennie wrote:The undermatched Amir Khan looks down to the winner of the world lightweight title clash between ageing Mexican Juan Manuel Marquez and Houston's beatable Juan Diaz for his next opponent on December 11 in the States, where Khan trains. Marquez and Diaz square up in Las Vegas at the end of the month.
Khan, the WBA light-welterweight champion, labels himself "a born fighter" and "in my prime" yet he conveniently and cynically overlooks the fact that he is not fighting a light-welter in December and that Diaz was licked by New York's light-hitting Paulie Malignaggi quite recently, who in turn was pounded by Khan in 11 rounds in Madison Sqaure Garden in May. Khan and his team really insult the game and its followers in December. The last opponent he bandied about was another small man in Cuba's Joel Casamayor, although the match failed to materialise. Forget his libido, there just has to be a serious problem with Khan's chin.

The thing is Bennie, you believe every bit of crap put out on this forum. What gives you the right to claim "Khan and his team really insult the game"?

As if, as a 22-year-old, facing Marquez is some terrible thing. Seems one rule for Khan one for everyone else.

I would be interested to see your opinion Witter v that Mexican he defended his title against. Obviously your opinions before the fights.

How about your opinion of Maidana v Corley? Why criticise Khan for wanting to fight Casamayor or Marquez, yet a fight like that comes along and Maidana is somehow some avoided fighter, even though he just backed out of a fight with Bradley?
And why do you believe that Khan is the obstacle to a Khan-Bradley/Alexander fight? You don't think for a minute that Gary Shaw/Don King would be asking for money that is way beyond anything being offered by the TV companies right now, do you? Maybe you believe that Khan should box for nothing?

Well, I felt insulted when I read it this morning (not on here). It just grates (with me) when a world light-welterweight champion is looking, not at his own to defend against but at lightweights. If he wants a lightweight, give him Prescott.

bennie wrote:

gobbles wrote:

bennie wrote:The undermatched Amir Khan looks down to the winner of the world lightweight title clash between ageing Mexican Juan Manuel Marquez and Houston's beatable Juan Diaz for his next opponent on December 11 in the States, where Khan trains. Marquez and Diaz square up in Las Vegas at the end of the month.
Khan, the WBA light-welterweight champion, labels himself "a born fighter" and "in my prime" yet he conveniently and cynically overlooks the fact that he is not fighting a light-welter in December and that Diaz was licked by New York's light-hitting Paulie Malignaggi quite recently, who in turn was pounded by Khan in 11 rounds in Madison Sqaure Garden in May. Khan and his team really insult the game and its followers in December. The last opponent he bandied about was another small man in Cuba's Joel Casamayor, although the match failed to materialise. Forget his libido, there just has to be a serious problem with Khan's chin.

As if, as a 22-year-old, facing Marquez is some terrible thing. Seems one rule for Khan one for everyone else.

I would be interested to see your opinion Witter v that Mexican he defended his title against. Obviously your opinions before the fights.

How about your opinion of Maidana v Corley? Why criticise Khan for wanting to fight Casamayor or Marquez, yet a fight like that comes along and Maidana is somehow some avoided fighter, even though he just backed out of a fight with Bradley?
And why do you believe that Khan is the obstacle to a Khan-Bradley/Alexander fight? You don't think for a minute that Gary Shaw/Don King would be asking for money that is way beyond anything being offered by the TV companies right now, do you? Maybe you believe that Khan should box for nothing?

Well, I felt insulted when I read it this morning (not on here). It just grates (with me) when a world light-welterweight champion is looking, not at his own to defend against but at lightweights. If he wants a lightweight, give him Prescott.

I think you have to remember that 1- in this internet age, every mention of a name or every time Khan or Schaefer open their mouths, it becomes a story, and 2- Never ever believe anything Gary Shaw or Don King say, they are not going to put Bradley or Alexander in a fight they think they might lose unless the money is huge.

gobbles wrote:

bennie wrote:

gobbles wrote:
As if, as a 22-year-old, facing Marquez is some terrible thing. Seems one rule for Khan one for everyone else.

I would be interested to see your opinion Witter v that Mexican he defended his title against. Obviously your opinions before the fights.

How about your opinion of Maidana v Corley? Why criticise Khan for wanting to fight Casamayor or Marquez, yet a fight like that comes along and Maidana is somehow some avoided fighter, even though he just backed out of a fight with Bradley?
And why do you believe that Khan is the obstacle to a Khan-Bradley/Alexander fight? You don't think for a minute that Gary Shaw/Don King would be asking for money that is way beyond anything being offered by the TV companies right now, do you? Maybe you believe that Khan should box for nothing?

Well, I felt insulted when I read it this morning (not on here). It just grates (with me) when a world light-welterweight champion is looking, not at his own to defend against but at lightweights. If he wants a lightweight, give him Prescott.

I think you have to remember that 1- in this internet age, every mention of a name or every time Khan or Schaefer open their mouths, it becomes a story, and 2- Never ever believe anything Gary Shaw or Don King say, they are not going to put Bradley or Alexander in a fight they think they might lose unless the money is huge.

I haven't been following the Khan threads, although I was vaguely aware that Khan and his team had been throwing about the usual names of Maidana and Bradley, which is the oldest trick in the book. You mention the big names, the punchers, but you have absolutely no intention of fighting them. I honestly believe that Khan will never fight a puncher again. I also believe that Khan, a huge light-welterweight, has no business fighting lightweights.