BoxRec

This season I propose that we abolish the Regional Titles they have been an epic failure from last season.

The titles did not mean anything, and they were not defended consistently. Not to mention the fact that there was a fair amount of bitching (myself included in that) about the selective fights from the Regional Champs.

I propose that eliminate the Regional Titles and include other titles.
Maybe we could try out having the IBO and WBF titles...

We could have them on par with the WBU title and only fighters ranked 20 and below can fight for them.
I believe it would bring a better interest for the unranked fighters.

Opinions? :)

I didn't defend against Castillo and Battino because they were on loosing runs and weren't even ranked. Not to mention the fact that Castillo never gave Famechon his rematch.

Every other fight during Kilbanes reign was justifiable. This was all pointed out to you the last time you brought this up.

Give me two minuites and I'll repost it

We won it against Dixon in week 13

JDC wrote:
Week 14

JDC wrote:

The End wrote: Next week

Ok

We are willing to wait until next week to make our first NABA title defense. Kilbane will have a non-title contest against Wayne McCullough.

Baby Arizmendi can take Wayne McCullough's place this week if he has a change of heart. The Title offer remains open

Week 15

We called out R Marquez

JDC wrote:

ben k wrote:Eder Jofre calls out Kilbane, If Kilbane beats Jofre consider Marquez Vs Kilbane signed for next week.

Ok. We consider this a fair situation. You have yourself a deal. Kilbane commits to the gym

We had to put ARIZMENDI off a week because of this

Week 16

JDC wrote:Kilbane wants to defend his NABA title against BABY ARIZMENDI

Week 17

JDC wrote:KILBANE wants BENNY BASS or GEORGE DIXON for an NABA shot.

Week 18

JDC wrote:Kilbane last week agreed to rematch BABY ARIZMENDI


Morales and Battalino are on the horizon, but we do think Battalino needs to stop getting K'd the Fvck out by Nicky Cook before he deserves a shot.

Win or loose this week Kilbane will give these two fighters a shot at some point in the near future.

Arizmendi agreed to fight someone else, so we immediately accepted Morales.



We conduct our business well and you having a problem with any of these matchups just shows you up as the bitch you are

Hell we even gave Morales a 3rd fight in week 20 after two close results

JDC wrote:Every other fight during Kilbanes reign was justifiable.

I wasn't accusing you of anything JDC... Our scrupple from last season is all forgot about and forgiven for my part.

My issue is with the Regional Titles themselves. If we are going to have Regional Titles - they should be defended every week.
Just like the World titles - it's risk and reward.

Last season, being a Regional Champ meant that after you won the title, you could sit on it for weeks...
Not to mention the fact you could handpick opponents.

A World Champ as well know, Must fight every week and Must fight a top tenner.

I would like to see World Titles such IBO and WBF introduced, maybe they will be held lower regard to the WBU, but it would be ideal for the lower ranked fighters.

I say we should just try it for this one season, see how it goes.

I agree regionals should be scrapped. I'd also agree with one more belt like the IBO being brought in.

I agree IBO is better.

Can defend against anyone in the top 25 sound good?

Crease wrote:

JDC wrote:Every other fight during Kilbanes reign was justifiable.

I wasn't accusing you of anything JDC... Our scrupple from last season is all forgot about and forgiven for my part.

My issue is with the Regional Titles themselves. If we are going to have a Regional Titles - they should be defended every week.
Just like the World titles - it's risk and reward.

Last season, being a Regional Champ meant that after you won the title you could sit on it for weeks...
Not to mention the fact you could handpick opponents.

A World Champ as well know, MUst fight every week and Must fight a top 10er.

I would like to see World Titles such IBO and WBF introduced, maybe they will lin lower regard to the WBU, but ti would be ideal ofr the lower ranked fighters.

I say we should just try it for this one season, see how it goes.

How about if there were regional eliminators. That way last season Castillo would have fought Battino as the two who were most interested?

I don't care one way or the other about regional titles, but what I would like to see is TF making these kind of threads (if he feels it's needed), not some jumped-up noob.

Week 1 stable war, Crease. Take your fecking medicine.

id like the major titles and the wbu. and thats it.

SAV wrote:id like the major titles and the wbu. and thats it.

Let's focus on the task at hand

shutty

How about:

IBO for fighters 11-19
WBU for fighters 20 and above

Adds a little something extra for those nearly there fighters.

hitman09 wrote:I agree regionals should be scrapped. I'd also agree with one more belt like the IBO being brought in.

JDC wrote:Can defend against anyone in the top 25 sound good?

Well that's a bit much, there should be a gap between "The Big Four" and the IBO...

I would suggest that the IBO (and WBF maybe?) be introduced as sister titles to the WBU...
And similar rules should be brought in for them...

For example:
The IBO (& WBF?) title(s) cannot be fought for by a fighter in the top 20...
Remember the WBU is top 15.

That's just what I think, as ever the majority will decide.

JDC wrote:How about if there were regional eliminators. That way last season Castillo would have fought Battino as the two who were most interested?

I'm not fussed on who fights for titles, but I don't think Regional Titles worked.

jBacca wrote:How about:

IBO for fighters 11-19
WBU for fighters 20 and above

Adds a little something extra for those nearly there fighters.

But doing things this way means that the new title is rated higher than the WBU title.

It shouldn't happen that way.

glittermonkey wrote:Week 1 stable war, Crease. Take your fecking medicine.

And the fact that you have Tommy Heanrns should be ignored?

Crease wrote:

jBacca wrote:How about:

IBO for fighters 11-19
WBU for fighters 20 and above

Adds a little something extra for those nearly there fighters.

But doing things this way means that the new title is rated higher than the WBU title.

It shouldn't happen that way.

IBO is better than WBU in the real world, why not in the Sim?

Crease wrote:

glittermonkey wrote:Week 1 stable war, Crease. Take your fecking medicine.

And the fact that you have Tommy Heanrns should be ignored?

The quack is back.

glittermonkey wrote:Week 1 stable war, Crease.

If you want it, it's done: Hearns vs Duran Week 1.

You will probably pull out anyway.

hitman09 wrote:The quack is back

My stable is fighting Tommy Heanrs for its first fight, lets see who you fight. NOOB!

Probably Kell Brook or someone like that.

Crease wrote:

hitman09 wrote:The quack is back

My stable is fighting Tommy Heanrs for its first fight, lets see who you fight. NOOB!

Probably Kell Brook or someone like that.

Don't Fuck with the Alliance Crease you'll end up like jeff

Grimm wrote:Don't Fuck with the Alliance Crease you'll end up like jeff

The Alliance is suffering from a famine, every season it fades away...
And who the fornicate is "Jeff"?

Crease wrote:

Grimm wrote:Don't Fuck with the Alliance Crease you'll end up like jeff

The Alliance is suffering from a famine, every season it fades away...
And who the eff is "Jeff"?

See. What happened to jeff was so bad people don't even remember him.

The Alliance never faded away either.

Where did the greatest sim tournament of all time come from?

Who knocked out Rafael Marquez?

Who is the greatest lightweight of all time?

I'll tell you what. The answer to these questions all have ties to The Alliance.

Crease wrote:

hitman09 wrote:The quack is back

My stable is fighting Tommy Heanrs for its first fight, lets see who you fight. NOOB!

Probably Kell Brook or someone like that.

You only agreed after I shamed you into it. Whiny little bitch NOOB. 8)