Is the Mayweather vPacquiao fight not happening a good thing
Posted: 23 Aug 2010, 08:26
With the recent ‘will it, won’t it’ debates happening in the Boxing World at the moment, could the Floyd Mayweather v Manny Pacquiao fight not happening actually be a positive thing?
To most Boxing fans, their calendars are filled up with dates at the moment, but for the casual sports fan, there is one Boxing date that is yet to be specified, Mayweather vs Pacquiao.
This is the fight that will draw heaps of attention from all around the world, and will be splashed all over our television screens and also be a regular feature of our national newspapers back pages. This in the Boxing World is generally considered a very positive sign. However, when looking back at the fights that have caught the casual sports fans and general public’s imagination- Lewis v Holyfield, Trinidad v De la Hoya, Lewis v Tyson, Mayweather v De la Hoya, Mayweather v Hatton- there is a recurring theme. That the fight never lived up to the hype that preceded it. Usually, the casual sports fan is left smarting that “boxing isn’t what it used to be”, “there’s not enough good boxers around today”, “there not taking any risks/chances” etc etc. Of course, us Boxing fans know better.
Of course, hindsight is a wonderful thing, and you cannot always predict which fights are going to be worth investing some money and build-up into. But it doesn’t take Nostradamus to see the potential in Marco Antonio Barrera v Erik Morales, Arturo Gatti v Mickey Ward or Diego Corrales v Jose Luis Castillo. Imagine one of them fights with a 24/7 showbuilding it up. Just imagine the modern day fighters, fights and rivalries that could be built up by introducing more 24/7 episodes. Juan Manual Lopez v Yuri Gamboa, Paul Williams v Sergio Martinez II, David Haye v Wladimir or Vitali Klitschko, Timothy Bradley v Devon Alexander.
Likewise, forget throwing extra millions at Mayweather and Pacquiao, to agree to each others options. Why not invest all of that money in a Super Six at light welter or welterweight, with a 360 show building that up too. With a British super-star such as Amir Khan in there, that could be a HUGE success. Look at the matches, stories and controversies that the Super-middleweight version has thrown up. If this tournament was shown on a more popular channel and given regular updates in the news, it could actually hold peoples interest.
The fights and the fighters are out there, it’s just a case of getting them noticed. In my eyes, Mayweather v Pacquiao is never going to fulfil its impossible expectations that it has set for itself. It remains an intriguing contest at least, to see how it would unfold, but will probably never amount to the fireworks that some people suggest.
Should we invest more time building up fights that will attract more and more fans, rather than heaping all of the hype on the pound 4 pounders who can only satisfy the purists of our sport?
To most Boxing fans, their calendars are filled up with dates at the moment, but for the casual sports fan, there is one Boxing date that is yet to be specified, Mayweather vs Pacquiao.
This is the fight that will draw heaps of attention from all around the world, and will be splashed all over our television screens and also be a regular feature of our national newspapers back pages. This in the Boxing World is generally considered a very positive sign. However, when looking back at the fights that have caught the casual sports fans and general public’s imagination- Lewis v Holyfield, Trinidad v De la Hoya, Lewis v Tyson, Mayweather v De la Hoya, Mayweather v Hatton- there is a recurring theme. That the fight never lived up to the hype that preceded it. Usually, the casual sports fan is left smarting that “boxing isn’t what it used to be”, “there’s not enough good boxers around today”, “there not taking any risks/chances” etc etc. Of course, us Boxing fans know better.
Of course, hindsight is a wonderful thing, and you cannot always predict which fights are going to be worth investing some money and build-up into. But it doesn’t take Nostradamus to see the potential in Marco Antonio Barrera v Erik Morales, Arturo Gatti v Mickey Ward or Diego Corrales v Jose Luis Castillo. Imagine one of them fights with a 24/7 showbuilding it up. Just imagine the modern day fighters, fights and rivalries that could be built up by introducing more 24/7 episodes. Juan Manual Lopez v Yuri Gamboa, Paul Williams v Sergio Martinez II, David Haye v Wladimir or Vitali Klitschko, Timothy Bradley v Devon Alexander.
Likewise, forget throwing extra millions at Mayweather and Pacquiao, to agree to each others options. Why not invest all of that money in a Super Six at light welter or welterweight, with a 360 show building that up too. With a British super-star such as Amir Khan in there, that could be a HUGE success. Look at the matches, stories and controversies that the Super-middleweight version has thrown up. If this tournament was shown on a more popular channel and given regular updates in the news, it could actually hold peoples interest.
The fights and the fighters are out there, it’s just a case of getting them noticed. In my eyes, Mayweather v Pacquiao is never going to fulfil its impossible expectations that it has set for itself. It remains an intriguing contest at least, to see how it would unfold, but will probably never amount to the fireworks that some people suggest.
Should we invest more time building up fights that will attract more and more fans, rather than heaping all of the hype on the pound 4 pounders who can only satisfy the purists of our sport?