BoxRec

Shouldn't be there. This is the commissioners domain and it should be he who decides as to whether something like that warrants being a sticky.

Considering it's a title only a few people endorse, it should not be at the top.

Let Ben have his fun. He's bigger than most of us put together!

So, what your saying is that it represents mischief and Tom foolery? You are impuning the names of two of the finest management teams in BRS history?

Well, Ben put it up there, perhaps he just wanted to advertise a bit of honesty and integrity. In the end he'll need to make that decision, however perhaps your's could be stickied as well. It does represent a bit of good work in behalf of illuminating the masses.

I would have no objection if you wanted your good work equally prominent.

The deed is done temporarily. You make a good point, we don't want the sticky section to get too cluttered. It may well be reaching critical mass.

Having notified the Powers that be ie Comissioner. It will stay there. So stop your bitching, It is the only true Hall of Fame

It being stickied gives the false impression that this is title that holds clout amongst the masses. It doesn't. It only matters to 3 people.

Noobs.

jBacca wrote:It being stickied gives the false impression that this is title that holds clout amongst the masses. It doesn't. It only matters to 3 people.

Noobs.

which is only about a dozen less than the amount the BRS matters to.

False Impression

No false impressions here, It is as stated the ONLY TRUE HALL OF FAME

MatthewS wrote:

jBacca wrote:It being stickied gives the false impression that this is title that holds clout amongst the masses. It doesn't. It only matters to 3 people.

Noobs.

which is only about a dozen less than the amount the BRS matters to.

I agree MatthewS. It will only upset the Managers like JBacca who will never be good enough to have a fighter in there.

MatthewS wrote:

jBacca wrote:It being stickied gives the false impression that this is title that holds clout amongst the masses. It doesn't. It only matters to 3 people.

Noobs.

which is only about a dozen less than the amount the BRS matters to.

Erm, doesn't that prove my point?

ben k wrote:

MatthewS wrote:

jBacca wrote:It being stickied gives the false impression that this is title that holds clout amongst the masses. It doesn't. It only matters to 3 people.

Noobs.

which is only about a dozen less than the amount the BRS matters to.

I agree MatthewS. It will only upset the Managers like JBacca who will never be good enough to have a fighter in there.

My fighters are above this standard. They regularly look down and laugh at your fighters.

If that was the case. You would not have started this thread. Your NOOBness has shown through, And you have been exposed as the Crease Wannabee that you really are

I started this thread because of the inadequacy of your title.

im no taking sides, especially not with a mate of Buzz...

It's an abuse of Mod powers, plain and simple. Should be taken down post haste!

Why is it only the scousers who are complaining. :P

Its pure nonesense

This will enrage many sims. Interesting that there is no commish endorsement.

Lets remember that this title was created when #2 fought #4. No ''ring'' credibility there. I'm all for a title like this, but it has to be true to what it claims to be. ''A Bum A Week'' after number 2 fought number 4 rendered the title only slightly above worthless.

ben k wrote:

Why is it only the scousers who are complaining. :P

Cos wer de boys n wha we say matters

jBacca wrote:

ben k wrote:

Why is it only the scousers who are complaining. :P

Cos wer de boys n wha we say matters

Is right lad.

JDC wrote:Its pure nonesense

This will enrage many sims. Interesting that there is no commish endorsement.

Lets remember that this title was created when #2 fought #4. No ''ring'' credibility there. I'm all for a title like this, but it has to be true to what it claims to be. ''A Bum A Week'' after number 2 fought number 4 rendered the title only slightly above worthless.

A bum of the Week never Happened

It was mentioned to upset the Masses. as is the Hall of Fame. And it seems to work time and time again.

But 2 vs 4 cannot be considered ring credible none the less

JDC wrote:But 2 vs 4 cannot be considered ring credible none the less

1st vs 2nd

Raf was the man at the time, he was on top of the rankings

1 RAFAEL MARQUEZ 18-2-0 (14)
2 AZUMAH NELSON 15-4-1 (10)


Need i add any more, Raf at the time was on top of the rankings, As he was for 99% of the season.

ben k wrote:

JDC wrote:But 2 vs 4 cannot be considered ring credible none the less

1st vs 2nd or 3rd

Raf was the man at the time, he was on top of the rankings

Maybe I've remembered it wrong, but I thought it was 2 vs 4 at the time. I don't think this title should be attainable until atleast week 12 in future to allow the rankings to sort themselves out. Also CPU opposition should be limited to <25%.

Seem fair?

You've remembered it wrong, but not by much. Rafa and Sanchez were the top two at the time, though it's a detail that seems to have skipped past Ben's mind without being noticed.