Page 1 of 1
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 01 Sep 2010, 13:00
by HomeOfBritishBoxing
great news! i think froch outworks abraham.
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 01 Sep 2010, 13:53
by bfchunk
That sorts the Super Six out and then WBC Holder v Kessler. Good stuff!
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 01 Sep 2010, 14:03
by WelshDevil
Seems the right way to go. I'm glad they've gone straight to the semi's and left the deadwood of Allan Green behind. (I wonder if he gets any compensation?)
Huge opportunity for Carl Froch to add 2 big wins to the resume, belts to the cabinet and the Super 6 crown.
Final will be for WBA and WBC belts. Kessler rightly gets a chance to fight the winner. Will Allan Green?
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 01 Sep 2010, 14:30
by Jesus
missing the 3rd group stage and going straight to the semi's is the right thing to do....with all the things that have gone wrong im sure anyone involved in the tournament will just want to complete the tournament as quick as possible without anymore hicups....
with everything that has gone wrong in the tournament it does leave the question whether anyone will try anything similar again....theres been rumours of a cruiserweight version but nothing has materialised.....
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 01 Sep 2010, 17:30
by punchers chance
so it's still on then!
perhaps the organisers could get their fingers out and sort out the ticket arrangements????
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 01 Sep 2010, 18:55
by n1ebf
this should be called the "retirement tournament".
Never again.........

Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 01 Sep 2010, 19:11
by winkveron
WelshDevil wrote:Seems the right way to go. I'm glad they've gone straight to the semi's and left the deadwood of Allan Green behind. (I wonder if he gets any compensation?)
Huge opportunity for Carl Froch to add 2 big wins to the resume, belts to the cabinet and the Super 6 crown.
Final will be for WBA and WBC belts. Kessler rightly gets a chance to fight the winner. Will Allan Green?
So Kessler can rest and then pick off the bones of the people who have fought tooth and nail in the extra fights for the belts? I don'r think that is fair.
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 01 Sep 2010, 19:22
by Crease
Excellent news, it will be great to see Froch as a World Champion again.

Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 03:42
by Smokin Preedy
Would love to see Froch vs Kessler again! last fight was brutal! just hope we can have it in Nottingham.
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 05:22
by Autobarn
WBC say they've not sanctioned the fight.
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 05:30
by dondada
Autobarn wrote:WBC say they've not sanctioned the fight.
Come on, you know better than that, Auto - post a link to save me time mate
And I'm sure they will when they get their dough.
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 05:45
by doctorboxing
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Autobarn wrote:WBC say they've not sanctioned the fight.
Come on, you know better than that, Auto - post a link to save me time mate
And I'm sure they will when they get their dough.
Especially given the fact they can keep Kessler as the "WBC marital champion". What the hell is that?
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 05:47
by dondada
doctorboxing wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Autobarn wrote:WBC say they've not sanctioned the fight.
Come on, you know better than that, Auto - post a link to save me time mate
And I'm sure they will when they get their dough.
Especially given the fact they can keep Kessler as the "WBC marital champion". What the hell is that?
Yeah, I think that's some kind of misprint, surely? Not another one?
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 05:51
by Deno1986
doctorboxing wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Autobarn wrote:WBC say they've not sanctioned the fight.
Come on, you know better than that, Auto - post a link to save me time mate
And I'm sure they will when they get their dough.
Especially given the fact they can keep Kessler as the "WBC marital champion". What the hell is that?
I'd say Jose Sulaimen opens up a random page on a dictionary and names his next belt after the first word he lays his eyes on.
Next up, the WBC 'Anxious' Heavyweight Champion
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 05:51
by Counter-puncher
Jose is well-used to playing the role of Pandarus, so it fits.
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 05:53
by Dioufy
Kessler is now, and wait for it.... "marital champion."
By my reckoning, Counter-Puncher is now pushed back to "interminable champion."
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 05:59
by Counter-puncher
:(
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 06:01
by Dioufy
I understand what "interim" means in context with boxing belts, but what the hell does marital mean?
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 06:07
by DavidPayne
Deno1986 wrote:doctorboxing wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Come on, you know better than that, Auto - post a link to save me time mate :lol:
And I'm sure they will when they get their dough.
Especially given the fact they can keep Kessler as the "WBC marital champion". What the hell is that?
I'd say Jose Sulaimen opens up a random page on a dictionary and names his next belt after the first word he lays his eyes on.
Next up, the WBC 'Anxious' Heavyweight Champion
Bruno won that against McCall and lived up to it on the Tyson II ringwalk.
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 06:12
by doctorboxing
DavidPayne wrote:Deno1986 wrote:doctorboxing wrote:
Especially given the fact they can keep Kessler as the "WBC marital champion". What the hell is that?
I'd say Jose Sulaimen opens up a random page on a dictionary and names his next belt after the first word he lays his eyes on.
Next up, the WBC 'Anxious' Heavyweight Champion
Bruno won that against McCall and lived up to it on the Tyson II ringwalk.
Audley would get excited if they had that one.
Maybe Jose uses this site before they create a new title:
http://watchout4snakes.com/creativityto ... dPlus.aspx
I got the WBC "Fizziest" champion of the world.
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 06:14
by DavidPayne
So the format is
Dirrell v Ward
Froch v Abraham
Ward v Abraham
Ward v Kessler
Abraham v Hopkins
Froch v Pascal II
Bute v Gary Stretch.
Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 06:51
by dondada
That's a brilliant site mate - I got WBC Vitreous champ

Re: Froch v. Abraham for the WBC title.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 07:01
by HomeOfBritishBoxing
dirrell-froch in the final. don't think froch will win tho :(