Page 1 of 2
Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:13
by big lennox
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2010/exclus ... icent-bill
This is a real shame.It's still a good bill, but I was looking forward to Ryan fighting again and watching Barker vs Macklin. Hopefully, they can all be rescheduled.B*ms.
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:20
by Josh1111
Yea, i just read that. This show has a real chance of collapsing if one more fighter drops out
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:42
by Autobarn
how about mackln-konekny up at middle?
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 10:49
by Deno1986
Autobarn wrote:how about mackln-konekny up at middle?
That may not be a bad shout. Konecny has fought at 160 domestically and in tune up fights (all recently) so he would be no stranger to the weight. I'm sure a deal could be arranged with the EBU that if Konecny fought and lost to Macklin he could retain his mandatory challenger status at 154.
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 11:00
by exittored
Its dissapointing if this is true as that could have been a very interesting fight for Rhodes as Konechy was no pushover.
As long as there are no other drop outs we still have a pretty strong line-up so can't complain too much
1) Nathan Cleverly vs. Karo Murat, 12 rounds, WBO light heavyweight eliminator
2) Enzo Maccarinelli vs. Alexander Frenkel, 12 rounds, for Maccarinelli's European cruiserweight title
3) Derek Chisora vs. Sam Sexton, 12 rounds, British/Commonwealth heavyweight unification
4) Kell Brook vs. Michael Jennings, 12 rounds, WBO welterweight eliminator
5) James DeGale vs. Carl Dilks, 12 rounds, super middleweights
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 11:01
by Adamj1987
exittored wrote:
Its dissapointing if this is true as that could have been a very interesting fight for Rhodes as Konechy was no pushover.
As long as there are no other drop outs we still have a pretty strong line-up so can't complain too much
1) Nathan Cleverly vs. Karo Murat, 12 rounds, WBO light heavyweight eliminator
2) Enzo Maccarinelli vs. Alexander Frenkel, 12 rounds, for Maccarinelli's European cruiserweight title
3) Derek Chisora vs. Sam Sexton, 12 rounds, British/Commonwealth heavyweight unification
4) Kell Brook vs. Michael Jennings, 12 rounds, WBO welterweight eliminator
5) James DeGale vs. Carl Dilks, 12 rounds, super middleweights
i still think chisora-sexton will be the highlight
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 11:05
by Adamj1987
MachoMan09 wrote:exittored wrote:
Its dissapointing if this is true as that could have been a very interesting fight for Rhodes as Konechy was no pushover.
As long as there are no other drop outs we still have a pretty strong line-up so can't complain too much
1) Nathan Cleverly vs. Karo Murat, 12 rounds, WBO light heavyweight eliminator
2) Enzo Maccarinelli vs. Alexander Frenkel, 12 rounds, for Maccarinelli's European cruiserweight title
3) Derek Chisora vs. Sam Sexton, 12 rounds, British/Commonwealth heavyweight unification
4) Kell Brook vs. Michael Jennings, 12 rounds, WBO welterweight eliminator
5) James DeGale vs. Carl Dilks, 12 rounds, super middleweights
I agree that it is still a pretty strong line-up. It was a flaw billing the show as the Mag' 7, though. Some of the fights were bound to fall through.
could still be the mag 7 if warren wanted it too and get some other fights in
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 11:11
by gobbles
Adamj1987 wrote:MachoMan09 wrote:exittored wrote:
Its dissapointing if this is true as that could have been a very interesting fight for Rhodes as Konechy was no pushover.
As long as there are no other drop outs we still have a pretty strong line-up so can't complain too much
1) Nathan Cleverly vs. Karo Murat, 12 rounds, WBO light heavyweight eliminator
2) Enzo Maccarinelli vs. Alexander Frenkel, 12 rounds, for Maccarinelli's European cruiserweight title
3) Derek Chisora vs. Sam Sexton, 12 rounds, British/Commonwealth heavyweight unification
4) Kell Brook vs. Michael Jennings, 12 rounds, WBO welterweight eliminator
5) James DeGale vs. Carl Dilks, 12 rounds, super middleweights
I agree that it is still a pretty strong line-up. It was a flaw billing the show as the Mag' 7, though. Some of the fights were bound to fall through.
could still be the mag 7 if warren wanted it too and get some other fights in
Macklin could still be on in a title fight, plus Gavin is on the bill and Broadhurst is supposed to have a title fight too
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 11:13
by Adamj1987
gobbles wrote:Adamj1987 wrote:MachoMan09 wrote:
I agree that it is still a pretty strong line-up. It was a flaw billing the show as the Mag' 7, though. Some of the fights were bound to fall through.
could still be the mag 7 if warren wanted it too and get some other fights in
Macklin could still be on in a title fight, plus Gavin is on the bill and Broadhurst is supposed to have a title fight too
exactly its still the mag 7
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 11:33
by mahatma
so whose going to pay 15 quid now,7 bouts were never going to hold together ridiculous to think that this was ever a pay per view
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 12:13
by JamesH
MachoMan09 wrote:I don't want to start criticising because I do think the show remains very good. However, as fights fall through and are replaced by lesser fights, at some point the superlative 'magnificent' is going to start to become a misnomer if it is describing seven contests that aren't all magnificent. D'ya follow?
I agree the show is still a strong show. I'm not so worried (in the short term at least) about whether or not its pay per view as I'm going. The magnificent 7, the almost magnificent 7, the not so bad 7, whatever, at the moment it's still a show I'm chomping at the bit for. I do hope that's the end of the drop outs now though....

Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 12:35
by TheCobra
exittored wrote:
Its dissapointing if this is true as that could have been a very interesting fight for Rhodes as Konechy was no pushover.
As long as there are no other drop outs we still have a pretty strong line-up so can't complain too much
1) Nathan Cleverly vs. Karo Murat, 12 rounds, WBO light heavyweight eliminator
2) Enzo Maccarinelli vs. Alexander Frenkel, 12 rounds, for Maccarinelli's European cruiserweight title
3) Derek Chisora vs. Sam Sexton, 12 rounds, British/Commonwealth heavyweight unification
4) Kell Brook vs. Michael Jennings, 12 rounds, WBO welterweight eliminator
5) James DeGale vs. Carl Dilks, 12 rounds, super middleweights
Still a decent line-up, but I no longer see it as PPV, I thought Macklin vs Barker was a massive blow to this bill and now Ryan Rhodes has dropped I'm really unsure how well they are gona do on the PPV with this.
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 12:37
by Frankie Gavin
Macklin is still on the show so it's just his opponent getting sorted
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 12:37
by HomeOfBritishBoxing
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
bet atleast 1 more fight doesn't happen now, this card is cursed.
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 12:38
by 15829
still 7 title fights with frankie fighting for the irish and don fighting for the english
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 12:40
by HomeOfBritishBoxing
diggler wrote:still 7 title fights with frankie fighting for the irish and don fighting for the english
yes but is the card now ppv material? with the main event gone and also rhodes gone?
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 12:43
by 15829
5 headline fights on 1 show yeah its better than some of the recent ppv shows like haye and khan
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 14:56
by leforge
When will Rhodes fight again? Will ppv go ahead still I not seen it advertised anywhere?
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 17:28
by Black Sam Bellamy
Mackin v Craig Watson ?
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 02 Sep 2010, 18:04
by Tommy Gunn13
diggler wrote:still 7 title fights with frankie fighting for the irish and don fighting for the english
Whos Broadhurst fighting for the English belt??
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 03 Sep 2010, 00:04
by whicker
diggler wrote:still 7 title fights with frankie fighting for the irish and don fighting for the english
Well, OK - well supported local boxers in bouts.
But "Title Fight" in itself isn't very meaningful any more, really.
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 03 Sep 2010, 02:45
by SweetLikeSugar
I can't see this bill shifting too many PPVs now. It's still a very strong card but I don't see the casual boxing fan forking out £15 to watch it. IMO without a world title on the line this shouldn't ever have been PPV. The selling point was the strength in depth of the card and now that two of the fights are off I don't see many sales.
Is there any chance at all this will be shown on regular Sky now?
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 03 Sep 2010, 02:53
by idle talk
gutted rhodes is off. I like watching him box. Clever fighter! The bills still good. I was really lookin forward to barker macklin
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 03 Sep 2010, 04:35
by oliverfennell
Adamj1987 wrote:i still think chisora-sexton will be the highlight
Wouldn't be surprised if that falls through too; same with Brook-Jennings.
Re: Ryan Rhodes is out now as well.Boo.
Posted: 03 Sep 2010, 09:27
by 15829
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:diggler wrote:still 7 title fights with frankie fighting for the irish and don fighting for the english
Whos Broadhurst fighting for the English belt??
think its michael robinson from liverpool