smith v simpson rd by rd.

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:17

rd 1 to smith

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:18

close round, could be 10-10, but I thought Smith edged it.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:21

20-18 Smith

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:21

tit for tat with smith looking alot sharper im giving 10-10 as no really clean work.

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:25

smith holding centre very well but now cut & dynamics may start to change.

smith 10-9.

mick the gash on hand

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:29

simpson ruffing it up & finding his way threw.

10-9 for simpson.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:29

Round four for Simpson

Baboon · Post by **Baboon** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:31

hmmm good to see the Darke & Watt have picked their winner already......by the sounds of it Simpson might as well pack it in now. Barely mentioning some good shots he's landed. Smith's leading for sure, but I'm getting pretty tired of these guys picking their winner barely into the fight.

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:32

Simpson is one tough SOB - good fight!

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:33

10-10 fight slowing down

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:34

Swifty is the classier operator - no doubt about that - but Simpson may well turn this into a war of attrition where he tests the Scouser's stamina.

Cracking fight

Baboon · Post by **Baboon** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:34

10-9
10-9
10-9
9-10
9-10

48-47 Smith, in my humble if slightly biased opinion....

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:35

I wish the Sky team would just commentate, rather than constantly try to pick the winner.

Already saying "defeats not the end of the world..."

HomeOfBritishBoxing · Post by **HomeOfBritishBoxing** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:35

4-1 swifty

HomeOfBritishBoxing · Post by **HomeOfBritishBoxing** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:37

4-2 smith

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:37

10-10 now the pro rds start

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:38

I thought Simpson edged the sixth.

Baboon · Post by **Baboon** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:40

10-10 - Simpson had the edge but Smith landed a great body shot near the end, hurt Simpson. Not totally sold that the second half of the fight 'has' to be Simpson's...

58-57 S

Tommy Gunn13 · Post by **Tommy Gunn13** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:40

f**k me my sky has gone off.......

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:41

simpson commanding ring centre & winning on the inside which may be key.

10-9 to simpson.

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:42

Can you 'old man' someone when you're 27? This is what Simpson is trying and it's having some effect, to be fair...if you have to scrap, scrap...

Baboon · Post by **Baboon** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:42

10-9 Simpson

67-67

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:42

Simpson is mauling Swifty in the clinches and giving him a tough fight - Smith will have learnt more in this fight than all his previous pro outings combined I reckon

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:42

I have it 67-66 Smith

tstephenson89 · Post by **tstephenson89** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:45

smith looks a bit shakey takin some good shots classy fighter but i think the heart and determination might win it for simpson

smith v simpson rd by rd.

smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.