Page 1 of 1
Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 13:25
by Crease
Now that we have five World Champions, I think we should to an understanding as to the definitions of World Champion(s)
How about this, if a boxer holds:
1 title - World Champion
2 titles- Double World Champion
3 titles- Triple World Champion
4 titles- Super World Champion
5 titles- Undisputed World Champion

I've been trying to find definitions of what you call a boxer who holds the x amount of titles simultaneously.
My research has not been fruitful. But what do you lads think we could put in to bring these terms to the BoxRecSim.

Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 13:41
by BoxBuzz
What about the WBU? Can they be the "Champion Deluxe with Cheese?
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 14:01
by Crease
BoxBuzz wrote:What about the WBU? Can they be the "Champion Deluxe with Cheese?
Well the WBU Champion can't fight for the other World Titles.
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 14:31
by BoxBuzz
Rest easy young squire......The SimRing Lonsdale Belt will properly quantify, qualify and track the Genuine champion.
When the time is right.
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 15:21
by JDC
Undisputed should be 5 not disputed
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 15:30
by BoxBuzz
Crease wrote:Now that we have five World Champions, I think we should to an understanding as to the definitions of World Champion(s)
How about this, if a boxer holds:
1 title - World Champion
2 titles- Double World Champion
3 titles- Triple World Champion
4 titles- Super World Champion
5 titles- Disputed World Champion

I've been trying to find definitions of what you call a boxer who holds the x amount of titles simultaneously.
My research has not been fruitful. But what do you lads think we could put in to bring these terms to the BoxRecSim.

As long as the SimRing Lonsdale belt exists, it could possibly remain disputed...unless the same man holds both.
I'm pretty sure he was considering that and factoring this important nuance when he selected his verbage.
He's no dummy that Crease!
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 15:31
by armageto
JDC wrote:Undisputed should be 5 not disputed
I didn't have the heart to break that to him....
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 18:35
by Crease
JDC wrote:Undisputed should be 5 not disputed
Correction noted and implemented.
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 18:36
by Crease
Do you guys think that we will have an Undisputed Champions this season?
(Holding all 5 titles?)
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 18:37
by BoxBuzz
Undisputedness happens.
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 11 Sep 2010, 19:10
by Grimm
The Alliance.
That's the definition of World Champions.
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 12 Sep 2010, 04:03
by glittermonkey
You don't need to bother with the definitions, Crease, old chap. I can't see you winning one belt, let alone two or three.
Besides:
1 title = World champion
2 - 4 titles = Unified champion
All titles = Undisputed champion
Simple, and none of this super champion crap.
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 12 Sep 2010, 16:25
by BoxBuzz
glittermonkey wrote:You don't need to bother with the definitions, Crease, old chap. I can't see you winning one belt, let alone two or three.
Besides:
1 title = World champion
2 - 4 titles = Unified champion
All titles = Undisputed champion
Simple, and none of this super champion crap.
What about the cheese champ?
Re: Definition of World Champions?
Posted: 12 Sep 2010, 16:30
by glittermonkey
BoxBuzz wrote:glittermonkey wrote:You don't need to bother with the definitions, Crease, old chap. I can't see you winning one belt, let alone two or three.
Besides:
1 title = World champion
2 - 4 titles = Unified champion
All titles = Undisputed champion
Simple, and none of this super champion crap.
What about the cheese champ?
It would bring in the cheddar, that's for sure.