Page 1 of 1
Karl Taylor
Posted: 20 Sep 2010, 17:32
by dondada
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2010/small- ... -yorkshire
Saw him yesterday and he really needs to pack it in. I probably did exactly the same thread a few years ago.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 20 Sep 2010, 17:51
by kierny
haha a donation for help the aged
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 20 Sep 2010, 17:53
by whicker
Whilst I would tend to agree, I suppose it can also be argued that if the guy is fit to box, who are we to deny him the right to make a living? If he can get fights, good luck to him.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 20 Sep 2010, 18:08
by REEVE
yeah hes not won in bloody years!
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 20 Sep 2010, 18:10
by whicker
REEVE wrote:yeah hes not won in bloody years!
His kind of journeyman doesn't tend to. Peter Buckley syndrome again.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 20 Sep 2010, 18:26
by gobbles
All well and good saying if hge's fit to box. let him, but these guys need saving from themselves. Being punched in the head isn't good for you. Just because he hasn't failed a brain scan yet doesn't mean there aren't problems down the road.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 20 Sep 2010, 18:37
by Darling
Great little report that Ian.
Thanks.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 20 Sep 2010, 18:44
by REEVE
whicker wrote:REEVE wrote:yeah hes not won in bloody years!
His kind of journeyman doesn't tend to. Peter Buckley syndrome again.
Yeah I know m8 madness really, he's been a pro since I was 2 years old lol, can the board not stop u for continually losing?
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 20 Sep 2010, 19:33
by lefty
Is he the fella who looks about 70?!Lol.One of the up and coming prospects beat him not too long ago right?Ive forgotten who it was now.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 21 Sep 2010, 03:10
by bennie
Karl was a tough little pro in his early years and secured a shot at the British lightweight title. I've watched him a few times in recent years and he still makes a fight of it. The age factor is insulting. Karl feels the same but you view him differently.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 21 Sep 2010, 05:51
by chris s
gobbles wrote:All well and good saying if hge's fit to box. let him, but these guys need saving from themselves. Being punched in the head isn't good for you. Just because he hasn't failed a brain scan yet doesn't mean there aren't problems down the road.
spot on
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 21 Sep 2010, 10:39
by gobbles
bennie wrote:Karl was a tough little pro in his early years and secured a shot at the British lightweight title. I've watched him a few times in recent years and he still makes a fight of it. The age factor is insulting. Karl feels the same but you view him differently.
"Karl feels the same". If he thinks he is the same now as he was in his twenties, he must be utterly deluded. Karl is 44 but could reasonably pass as 60+ if you saw him in the street.
Boxing is not a sport for people in their mid-40s at the best of times, especially if they are just getting beaten.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 21 Sep 2010, 15:50
by dondada
bennie wrote:Karl was a tough little pro in his early years and secured a shot at the British lightweight title. I've watched him a few times in recent years and he still makes a fight of it. The age factor is insulting. Karl feels the same but you view him differently.
The age thing is only part of it. He isn't really making a fight of it any more, I don't think. I don't want to see him end up like Clakka.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 21 Sep 2010, 15:51
by dondada
Darling wrote:Great little report that Ian.
Thanks.
Thanks mate. Don't do as many reports as I used to...good to occasionally show the other lads how it's done

Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 21 Sep 2010, 15:55
by Coco
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:bennie wrote:Karl was a tough little pro in his early years and secured a shot at the British lightweight title. I've watched him a few times in recent years and he still makes a fight of it. The age factor is insulting. Karl feels the same but you view him differently.
The age thing is only part of it. He isn't really making a fight of it any more, I don't think. I don't want to see him end up like Clakka.
Karl is still doing a great job
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 22 Sep 2010, 04:25
by bennie
gobbles wrote:bennie wrote:Karl was a tough little pro in his early years and secured a shot at the British lightweight title. I've watched him a few times in recent years and he still makes a fight of it. The age factor is insulting. Karl feels the same but you view him differently.
"Karl feels the same". If he thinks he is the same now as he was in his twenties, he must be utterly deluded. Karl is 44 but could reasonably pass as 60+ if you saw him in the street.
Boxing is not a sport for people in their mid-40s at the best of times, especially if they are just getting beaten.
I've seen Karl lose many a fight he could have won, including one with the world-rated Ashley Theophane. Karl knows how to keep himself employed, and besides, he doesn't get paid any more for winning - and what's wrong with looking 60-plus?
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 01 Oct 2010, 20:55
by gobbles
bennie wrote:gobbles wrote:bennie wrote:Karl was a tough little pro in his early years and secured a shot at the British lightweight title. I've watched him a few times in recent years and he still makes a fight of it. The age factor is insulting. Karl feels the same but you view him differently.
"Karl feels the same". If he thinks he is the same now as he was in his twenties, he must be utterly deluded. Karl is 44 but could reasonably pass as 60+ if you saw him in the street.
Boxing is not a sport for people in their mid-40s at the best of times, especially if they are just getting beaten.
I've seen Karl lose many a fight he could have won, including one with the world-rated Ashley Theophane. Karl knows how to keep himself employed, and besides, he doesn't get paid any more for winning - and what's wrong with looking 60-plus?
Really? I haven't seen him win a round in about five years. True I do only usually see him fight prospects on bigger shows, but still. I see he doesn't have a W on the first page of his record now.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 02 Oct 2010, 03:56
by LeedsLad
Promoters shouldn't really use him anymore, given that he doesn't actually offer a test to even the most average prospect.
It's these type of journeymen that hamper the sport in my opinion. The uninitiated fan attending his first show would probably be sickened to see a man that looks like their grandad fighting a young lad in his early 20's.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 02 Oct 2010, 07:21
by whicker
Coco wrote:
Karl is still doing a great job
True, he's doing the job he is hired to do.
Whether thats for the good of the sport, or the fans, is a different question.
Re: Karl Taylor
Posted: 02 Oct 2010, 07:24
by whicker
Just noticed, he once fought Mark Anthony in the Collessum*, I didn't know he was THAT old.
*True- and he even won!
