Page 1 of 1

The Board rejected Jorge Castro

Posted: 20 Nov 2003, 14:00
by bennie
Just 24 hours after hearing that he was due to face former world champion Jorge Castro at the Cardiff Ice Rink next month, Enzo Maccarinelli has learned that his opponent has been changed.
The Board of Control have vetoed the veteran Argentine, so the Swansea man's second WBU cruiserweight defence will now be against a fighter from across the Andes, Chile's Carlos Cruzat.
The Board's decision was based mainly on reports from South Africa of Castro's July challenge to IBO champion Sebastiaan Rothmann, which referred to him "clowning around" and generally being less than competitive.
Cruzat, who will be 35 three days after the December 6 showdown, may not have Castro's experience, but should be more ambitious.
He took up boxing after watching Roberto Duran beat Sugar Ray Leonard on TV and by the time he was seven was telling friends that he would be a world champion.
He achieved that feat, if you regard the IBA belt as a world title - and, in fairness, it's at least on a par with Maccarinelli's WBU honour - winning it in 2000 and ruling until this year, when he was stripped for inactivity.
A knee injury has kept the Chilean out since last November.
Carlos suffered five defeats early in his career, while based in California, but has not been beaten since 1993.
He has won 14 on the trot.

Posted: 20 Nov 2003, 14:14
by stujones
Fair points Bennie, although I'm blooming shocked at this decision by the BBBoC. I mean, even at this stage of his career there have been alot worst imports challenging for spurious world (and other titles) on these sures.

Take the guy who Hobson beat to win the vacant commonwealth title for example. Castro is still not to bad for Enzo at this stage, god Enzo is no Rothmann yet.

Posted: 20 Nov 2003, 14:27
by Goz
stujones wrote:Fair points Bennie, although I'm blooming shocked at this decision by the BBBoC. I mean, even at this stage of his career there have been alot worst imports challenging for spurious world (and other titles) on these sures.

Take the guy who Hobson beat to win the vacant commonwealth title for example. Castro is still not to bad for Enzo at this stage, god Enzo is no Rothmann yet.
Absolutely!

I think Castro would have been here to have a go to be quite honest.

It was only 20 odd months ago he lost a decision to Jirov!

Considering some of the guys we have seen on these shores over the years I'm very surprised.

And as you say Enzo is hardly a top 10 fighter.

Posted: 20 Nov 2003, 14:45
by Guest
Agreed with Goz. Yet again the Board fail to make any sense. Goz, I sent you a pm earlier re:Calzaghe, check it out.

Posted: 20 Nov 2003, 20:27
by steve689
stujones wrote:Fair points Bennie, although I'm blooming shocked at this decision by the BBBoC. I mean, even at this stage of his career there have been alot worst imports challenging for spurious world (and other titles) on these sures.

Take the guy who Hobson beat to win the vacant commonwealth title for example. Castro is still not to bad for Enzo at this stage, god Enzo is no Rothmann yet.
Very good points Stu, i mean Abdul Kaddu who Hobson fought was a joke, Castro is a natural clown but he is a more than credible for for Enzo Macarinelli. Like the Football FA it seems we have a board who know little about the sport they repesent.