Page 1 of 3

Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 13 Oct 2010, 16:15
by Craig14
Cameron versus McCracken is on the Green/Flores undercard in Perth, what do people think?
I'm going for a Cameron stoppage in about 6.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 14 Oct 2010, 00:28
by scottearley123456
i havent realy seen much of eigher but i watchd cameron on the green briggs undercard and a couple of other times and he realy doesnt seem anything special.

is there any of his fights that are perticualy exciting that i should look up ?

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 14 Oct 2010, 00:32
by iron rhino
yid14 wrote:Cameron versus McCracken is on the Green/Flores undercard in Perth, what do people think?
I'm going for a Cameron stoppage in about 6.
I'm gonna go camron on points.Green will lose to flores.But i'm still backing him!!

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 14 Oct 2010, 04:21
by Rogue
iron rhino wrote:
yid14 wrote:Cameron versus McCracken is on the Green/Flores undercard in Perth, what do people think?
I'm going for a Cameron stoppage in about 6.
I'm gonna go camron on points.Green will lose to flores.But i'm still backing him!!
For the heck of it I might put some dosh on Green R1 KO/TKO ..... :D

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 14 Oct 2010, 04:28
by foxdog1923
Definately be a good fight. I reckon many would watch this fight in NZ and Australia especially, no Im not trying to say its a NZ vs Aus thing but most of the interest would be from these two countries.

These 2 will go to a decision IMO however if its to end in a KO it'll be Shane doing the knocking out IMO.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 14 Oct 2010, 04:56
by Rogue
Cameron KO.....

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 14 Oct 2010, 09:09
by Hounddawg
Shane Cameron decision winner 78-74, not a very interesting fight, This fails to register here. Green v Flores, thats what Australia wants.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 14 Oct 2010, 21:18
by colin russell
Whats that Rhino?

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 15 Oct 2010, 09:36
by patron
iron rhino wrote:
yid14 wrote:Cameron versus McCracken is on the Green/Flores undercard in Perth, what do people think?
I'm going for a Cameron stoppage in about 6.
I'm gonna go camron on points.Green will lose to flores.But i'm still backing him!!
what!to run second, i didn,t know the bookies bet eachway on the fights, all the best

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 15 Oct 2010, 19:03
by 'Frilla
Green flores flore. :DD

Cameron on points.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 00:38
by scottearley123456
'Frilla wrote:Green flores flore. :DD

Cameron on points.
i would of said green by decision before but he has stacked on some weight and is closer to 90kg now, i reckon he flores flores for sure :lol:

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 02:29
by jezzamundo
I'm not sure Green putting on weight is actually the best thing for him. He was never a natural SMW, but has always been a natural LHW. I'm sure he could still make LHW now, although it would almost certainly weaken him somewhat. I believe that while fighting at LHW Green generally walked around at about 86kg/190lb, so I would guess that his current walking weight would be a little over that. More bulk could slow Green down, which is exactly what he doesn't need against Flores.

We know Flores will weigh 200lb, I don't think Green should really come in any heavier than 190lb, 10lb at this size doesn't make a great difference.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 03:52
by scottearley123456
jezzamundo wrote:I'm not sure Green putting on weight is actually the best thing for him. He was never a natural SMW, but has always been a natural LHW. I'm sure he could still make LHW now, although it would almost certainly weaken him somewhat. I believe that while fighting at LHW Green generally walked around at about 86kg/190lb, so I would guess that his current walking weight would be a little over that. More bulk could slow Green down, which is exactly what he doesn't need against Flores.

We know Flores will weigh 200lb, I don't think Green should really come in any heavier than 190lb, 10lb at this size doesn't make a great difference.

yeah sounds about right acording to hyder he is about he is between 87 and 88 kgs now and looking good, i wonder if he started putting on weight in july right after the briggs fight rather just after he confirmed flores . if he carries the weight well in this fight maybe he could be a reel danger to the rest of the top end cruisers

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 17 Oct 2010, 18:04
by Marlin
Has anyone seen him with the extra weight?

I remember thinking he was a little 'soft' around the midsection in his promo's for his last few fights. If he has put weight on I hope he has done it the right way.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 19 Oct 2010, 18:59
by roughdiamond
Cameron will beat McCracken easy.
He is looking sharp in the gym and getting back to 90.7kg is a more realistic and natural weight for Cameron
who always struggled to be a heavyweight. He was an awesome amateur at 91kgs knocking out Adam Forsyth on at least one occasion and stopping him on points in another.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 19 Oct 2010, 22:07
by scottearley123456
Marlin wrote:Has anyone seen him with the extra weight?

I remember thinking he was a little 'soft' around the midsection in his promo's for his last few fights. If he has put weight on I hope he has done it the right way.

yeah i remember him looking slightly podgy just before siaca but i think he looked better for briggs fight though.

its hard to tell from his latest facebook photo but i can only imagine he has be sensibly about it.
i asked hyder and he reckons he looks massive at the heavier weight, not sure if he means bulky though.

oh well fingers crossed

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 10:24
by bubaloo
anthony mccracken won that fight! for the judges to judge it the way they did was crazy, sometimes you really have to wonder if this is a fair sport! Even the croud was screamin booo! Open your eyes judges and judge it fair!!!!

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 10:35
by jezzamundo
Hopefully that's the final nail in the coffin of the potential Green vs Cameron fight. Cameron himself said he would need a KO win to become a viable DG opponent.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 17:49
by Marlin
I missed this fight. I set the IQ to record but the bloody thing only kicked in during the Wilson - Bryce fight :witzend:

Sounds like I missed an interesting fight?

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 19:05
by dan h
Good back and firth fight but McCracken definitely should have got the nod. Cameron is very limited these days, I thought he was much better at HW to be honest.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 19:23
by Marlin
Surely that knocks a Green fight on the head?

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 19:38
by bigred83
Marlin wrote:Surely that knocks a Green fight on the head?
i hope so, be just as short as cameron v tua if not shorter. but def way more insignificant.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 20:09
by Beltane
It was a very close fight for first 9 rounds and the scorecards were hard to separate and one has to give both fighters their credit as one would tee off and then the other would counter. Cameron spilt a lot of blood and that gave the impression that he took a lot of punishment, which he did but he gave just as much back and won 2 of the last 3 rounds (spliting the 11th) and on my scorecard that gave it to him by a narrow margin. The judges scorecards were unkind to McCraken who put in a determined effort.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 20:20
by belta53
I saw the fight exactly as the previous poster (Beltane) did, I scored it 115-114 Cameron. I thought McCracken fought a career best fight and could have easily been given the decision. On the basis of that fight I can't see Cameron troubling Green, if the fight was fought at the cruiserweight limit then obviously Cameron would have one thing in his favour, but I just see him as too easy for Green to hit.

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken

Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 20:21
by Sweet P
I did the timekeeping on this fight, I kept a scorecard for myself. I had Cameron winning by 2 points. 115-113 Great fight.