Page 1 of 2

Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:12
by SteveDow
On Saturday in Manchester, David Haye defends his WBA title against Audley Harrison. It will be the highest grossing prizefight ever held on these shores. The arena is sold out, the nation is talking and the cameras are ready to roll. And a lot of boxing fans aren't happy about it.

The charges are that Haye is ducking the Klitschko brothers, that the Harrison fight is a mismatch being foisted on a gullible public, and that Haye is devaluing the great traditions of heavyweight boxing. Above all, it is said, Haye-Harrison is bad for boxing.

The critics could not be more wrong. They think boxing's decline can be abated just by matching good fighters in tough, competitive fights. No: Haye-Harrison is exactly what British boxing needs.

In 2007 Haye journeyed to France to fight Jean-Marc Mormeck, the man recognised as the world's best cruiserweight, in his back yard. Fewer than 4,000 people were in attendance and the British public didn't give a damn when Haye triumphed against the odds.

Carl Froch still labours in that kind of obscurity due to inept matchmaking and promotion. Froch challenges Arthur Abraham this month, his fifth world-class opponent in a row.

Despite such hardiness, the Lace City Cobra has not boosted the sport's standing one jot. And yet his is the career path many wish upon Haye. Do they want the sport to fade away?

Since 2007 Haye has worked incredibly hard, in and out of the ring, to raise his profile. He has become the standard-bearer for British boxing and in fighting Audley Harrison he is having more success than ever in drawing exposure to a sport so starved of the spotlight.

Audley Harrison is a brilliant choice of opponent because boxing is more than two men exchanging blows. Boxing is showbusiness. Sporting interest in a competitive fight attracts the faithful but human interest stories attract millions. Boxing thrives on spectacle, personality and intrigue.

In the pre-fight hype alone, the big-talking 'A-Force' has provided more entertainment than many heavyweight contenders have in their careers. Haye could fight the likes of Tomasz Adamek and Eddie Chambers and he would beat them but what would be the point? Nobody has heard of those guys. They're dull.

There is something deeply fascinating about Harrison, a man who has convinced himself he is the lead character in a redemption story; come Saturday he may discover he is a peripheral character in the video nasty that is David Haye's Highlight Reel.

Like so many fights, Haye-Harrison is being sold on a big 'What if?' What if Audley Harrison connects with his left hand - the punch they call the equaliser? Lights Out. Bulbs flash. New champ. Pandemonium. It would be the boxing story of the year.

Yes, that is an unlikely scenario. It is likely that Haye knocks Harrison out early. So the public finally tunes in to a boxing match only to be disappointed by a quick finale, right? Wrong.

Mike Tyson is not the highest earning boxer ever because the public dislikes early KOs. Nobody paid to see Tyson fight Carl Williams or Tony Tubbs because they thought they would see a competitive boxing match. But paid they did.

Haye will earn in excess of £5m fighting Harrison. Obscene, you say. But it's good for boxing. What happens when athletic kids learn they can make £5m... for fighting Audley Harrison? There comes the next generation.

Okay then, the Klitschkos; Haye will fight a Klitschko brother, probably in 2011, maybe in 2012, but it will happen. Such a wait is nothing new. Be patient.

After Evander Holyfield defeated Mike Tyson in 1996 it was clear that Holyfield and Lennox Lewis were the world's best heavyweights. They didn't fight until 1999, and all because boxing is business.

The Klitschkos have made good money fighting overmatched opponents for years but are making a stink at Haye doing the same now. The truth is that the Ukrainian brothers need Haye more than he needs them.

Vitali and Wladimir have never beaten any top-level opponents and they want to fight Haye to secure some sort of legacy. Well, if they want him immediately, they must make him an offer he can't refuse. And when Haye is making £5m-plus against Harrison, that offer needs to be serious money.

Haye has earned the right to maximise his income. He took risky fights overseas to defeat first Mormeck and then "Sugar" Nikolai Valuev for world titles and is only now making the big money his hard work deserves.

Anyone who claims they wouldn't make the same sensible financial choices as Haye in his position is either an idiot or a liar.

And, in making the choice to fight Harrison, Haye is only following in the tradition of heavyweight champions, not breaking it. Boxing has always been business.

Jack Dempsey defended his title just four times between 1921 and 1926 whilst raking it in through endorsements and Hollywood movies.

Floyd Patterson and Ingemar Johansson both fought only once a year in 1959, 1960 and 1961 and every time against each other for the world title. This was because of the then crippling marginal tax rate in the US.

The wilful naivety adopted by the naysayers as to the nature of the fight game is tedious in the extreme.

Boxing is business. Haye-Harrison is good business. And good business is great for British boxing.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:22
by Kilsby
what about this one.... :D

http://www.boxingnews24.com/2010/11/box ... black-eye/

by Stuart Young: Some of you may, or may not, have noticed that I’ve been a bit quiet on the ol’ article writing of late. Although I can assure my loyal fans that I haven’t lost my passion for the premiere sport on the planet, been abducted by aliens or converted to the ‘dark side’ preferring to watch two men writhing around the floor semi-naked in a passionate embrace in a celebration of UFC’s finest fistic talents just yet, I’ve just been…. well y’know – just kinda busy.


My last two articles that made there way onto ‘the net’ were titled “Amir to hand out a masterclass” (attached: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=23848&more=1 ) back in May, and Haye Vs Ruiz Preview, the month previous (attached: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=23314&more=1 ) – If you would, please take a few minutes to read both articles.

If you did actually take the time out to read them, I can now guess what your thinking, something along the lines of “Jesus! this guys good… real good!” and I am – anyhow, I don’t want to be known as some sort of boxing demi-god just yet, or hailed as the second coming of Nostradamus, naturally I really don’t like to gloat but I pretty much nailed both the fights as they were, give or take a round or two.

The fact that John Ruiz and Pauli Malignaggi had only been stopped twice between them in over 80 professional bouts only adds to the awe of which these seemingly ‘legendary’ predictions are now held by many in the boxing fraternity.

So now I’ve managed to grab your attention, I intend to let it be known that from now, until Christmas, I will be once again be putting my head on the chopping block with a weekly column / prediction / betting article that shoots from the hip and pulls no punches.

First up this weekend, is the David Haye Vs Audley Harrison mismatch, sorry – fight.

Ok, a lot of people are getting rather exited about this fight in Britain, with almost everyone getting caught up in the hype, casual fans are being drawn to the sport like moths to a flame, everyone has an opinion on it whether you ask the butcher, baker, or candlestick maker down the street – and that’s just a list some of Harrison’s previous opponents.

If you’re a hardened boxing expert like myself, or just a regular beer-swilling, smoking yob, who resides in our UK city centre pubs at weekends, I’m here to offer you poor souls – the average punter, who usually struggles to pick his nose correctly, a way to make some serious hard cash, and with their being a global recession on, I won’t even charge you for the tipping service.

To make money, first you must distance yourself from the epidemic that is currently sweeping these shores that possesses a far greater threat to your physical and mental health (or wallet for that matter) than bird flu or swine flu ever could.

Your loved ones could have this disease and not even know it yet, your best friend could have it, your daughter’s boyfriend, your doctor, your doctor’s doctor, even worse, YOU could be suffering with this disease right now and not even know about it.

Since I’ve discovered this disease, I found myself with the distinction of being able to name it, so I’ve chosen the aptly named it “Hatton’s Syndrome.”

It’s a disease that attacks the brain making an otherwise sane person become delusional, unable to distinguish between what’s real and what’s not, victims can often be found talking in riddles and spouting general nonsense whilst genuinely believing whatever he/she is saying as the truth and that certain individuals can now perform seemingly impossible feats, they seem to like the chant “YES I CAN” and have adopted it as their motto.

I’ve identified the ‘carrier’ of this disease through hours of tedious detective work and traced it back to it’s source which happens to be none other than (fr)Audley Harrison, and what’s really scary about this ‘germ’ is now it’s mutated and become ‘airborne’ meaning it’s infection rate has rocketed to fever-pitch levels over the last few weeks, infecting masses of people from all sections of society, regardless of colour or creed it is expected to peak on Saturday 13th November.

Fortunately for us, David Haye carries large doses of the anti-venom and after a few stiff jabs everyone should be restored to their previous state of mind by the morning of 14th November suffering no more than slight side-effects that include feeling a heightened sense of stupidity, shame and just a little embarrassment.

On 13th November expect Harrison to enter the ring and perform his best ice-cube impression as he will freeze faster than a rabbit in headlights once he’s taken centre stage.

I wouldn’t recommend backing Harrison with my hard-earned cash even if he entered the ring armed with a Tommy Gun on Saturday night, obviously not to be confused with Tommy ‘The Machine’ Gunn from the Rocky films, (who would actually stand a better chance in his current state than the methodical plodding Harrison in his) so I won’t advise you to back him with your money either, unless of course, your after revenge and have access to someone’s credit card you really despise!

But in all seriousness, help yourself to the generous 5/6 currently on offer at Skybet that David Haye wins the fight by TKO/KO or DSQ in rounds 1-6 or for those of you who like to live a little more dangerously take the 11/4 on offer by both Coral & Bluesquare that Haye wins by the same method of victory in rounds 1-3.

That should set us up nicely for some late night boxing action over the pond, where on the same night ‘Filipino Flash’ and current P4P king Manny Pacquiao takes on Mexican warrior Antonio ‘Tony’ Margarito in a Bob Arum promoted clash at Dallas Cowboy’s stadium in Dallas, Texas.

Fortunately, these days after the hand-wrap scandal and subsequent 12 month ban suffered by Margarito, Freddie Roach will insist on being present in Margarito’s dressing room while ‘Tony’ gets his hands wrapped. With Roach inspecting the ‘wrapping’ closer than the proverbial short sighted ‘bookworm’ in a reading class for any ‘illegal workmanship’ you can be sure that the only granite Margarito will be ‘loaded’ with in this bout is the type he naturally possesses in his whiskers.

Known for his durability, Antonio Margarito has showed all the lateral movement of a slug stuck in treacle in recent bouts and I don’t expect a new head trainer Robert Garcia, to be pulling up any trees reinventing Margarito’s fighting style at this late stage of his career.

Manny Pacquiao should be able to use his speed and his unconventional in-and-out style to pot-shot Margarito at will with jabs, left-hooks & counters all night long while coasting to a wide unanimous decision with relative ease.

So that’s why I recommend you take the rather tasty 10/3 being offered at Bet365 for Pacquiao to win this fight by Points or Technical decision, sit back, relax, and wait for the money to roll in.

Good luck and happy punting.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:32
by orbtastic
Kilsby wrote:I can now guess what your thinking, something along the lines of “Jesus! this guys good… real good!”
Must resist.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:34
by dondada
Bit naughty posting that without the link:

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/11112010/ ... rison.html

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:36
by Datsue
orbtastic wrote:
Kilsby wrote:I can now guess what your thinking, something along the lines of “Jesus! this guys good… real good!”
Must resist.
Great minds...

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:37
by Kilsby
^^^^^^
Exactly :KO:

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:38
by dondada
Kilsby wrote:what about this one.... :D

http://www.boxingnews24.com/2010/11/box ... black-eye/

by Stuart Young: “Jesus! this guys good… real good!” and I am
There are so many things wrong with that piece it's untrue.

I particularly like the above bit though.

'Jesus! this (capital letter omitted) guys (apostrophe omitted) good...real (really?) good!'

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:42
by Kilsby
Its not a english piece! :lol:

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:43
by Counter-puncher
wow, Stuart Young isn't at all irritating, is he?

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:44
by doctorboxing
Kilsby wrote:what about this one.... :D

http://www.boxingnews24.com/2010/11/box ... black-eye/

by Stuart Young:
My last two articles that made there way onto ‘the net’ were titled “Amir to hand out a masterclass” (attached: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=23848&more=1 ) back in May, and Haye Vs Ruiz Preview, the month previous (attached: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=23314&more=1 ) – If you would, please take a few minutes to read both articles.

If you did actually take the time out to read them, I can now guess what your thinking, something along the lines of “Jesus! this guys good… real good!” and I am – anyhow, I don’t want to be known as some sort of boxing demi-god just yet, or hailed as the second coming of Nostradamus, naturally I really don’t like to gloat but I pretty much nailed both the fights as they were, give or take a round or two.
What a cock.

He picked the same results as the vast majority of boxing fans did and now he is going out on a limb and picking Haye to stop Harrison? He must make a fortune from the bookies!

I'll go with an even bolder prediction and pick Wlad to beat Chisora. Now if that comes true, will I be some sort of boxing demi-god as well?

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 09:44
by Kilsby
LEGEND! :bow:

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 10:03
by dondada
Kilsby wrote:Its not a english piece! :lol:
Yes, it is. If it's supposed to be journalism that is. If it's actually supposed to be a crock of dung - or some attempt at parody - fine.

I only picked that bit out because of the irony.

It's appalling in almost every respect. It's the type of sh1t established print writers (the dinosaurs amongst them) can point at and justify their criticisms of web hacks.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 11:10
by jamesmcdonnell
SteveDow wrote:On Saturday in Manchester, David Haye defends his WBA title against Audley Harrison. It will be the highest grossing prizefight ever held on these shores. The arena is sold out, the nation is talking and the cameras are ready to roll. And a lot of boxing fans aren't happy about it.

The charges are that Haye is ducking the Klitschko brothers, that the Harrison fight is a mismatch being foisted on a gullible public, and that Haye is devaluing the great traditions of heavyweight boxing. Above all, it is said, Haye-Harrison is bad for boxing.

The critics could not be more wrong. They think boxing's decline can be abated just by matching good fighters in tough, competitive fights. No: Haye-Harrison is exactly what British boxing needs.

In 2007 Haye journeyed to France to fight Jean-Marc Mormeck, the man recognised as the world's best cruiserweight, in his back yard. Fewer than 4,000 people were in attendance and the British public didn't give a damn when Haye triumphed against the odds.

Carl Froch still labours in that kind of obscurity due to inept matchmaking and promotion. Froch challenges Arthur Abraham this month, his fifth world-class opponent in a row.

Despite such hardiness, the Lace City Cobra has not boosted the sport's standing one jot. And yet his is the career path many wish upon Haye. Do they want the sport to fade away?

Since 2007 Haye has worked incredibly hard, in and out of the ring, to raise his profile. He has become the standard-bearer for British boxing and in fighting Audley Harrison he is having more success than ever in drawing exposure to a sport so starved of the spotlight.

Audley Harrison is a brilliant choice of opponent because boxing is more than two men exchanging blows. Boxing is showbusiness. Sporting interest in a competitive fight attracts the faithful but human interest stories attract millions. Boxing thrives on spectacle, personality and intrigue.

In the pre-fight hype alone, the big-talking 'A-Force' has provided more entertainment than many heavyweight contenders have in their careers. Haye could fight the likes of Tomasz Adamek and Eddie Chambers and he would beat them but what would be the point? Nobody has heard of those guys. They're dull.

There is something deeply fascinating about Harrison, a man who has convinced himself he is the lead character in a redemption story; come Saturday he may discover he is a peripheral character in the video nasty that is David Haye's Highlight Reel.

Like so many fights, Haye-Harrison is being sold on a big 'What if?' What if Audley Harrison connects with his left hand - the punch they call the equaliser? Lights Out. Bulbs flash. New champ. Pandemonium. It would be the boxing story of the year.

Yes, that is an unlikely scenario. It is likely that Haye knocks Harrison out early. So the public finally tunes in to a boxing match only to be disappointed by a quick finale, right? Wrong.

Mike Tyson is not the highest earning boxer ever because the public dislikes early KOs. Nobody paid to see Tyson fight Carl Williams or Tony Tubbs because they thought they would see a competitive boxing match. But paid they did.

Haye will earn in excess of £5m fighting Harrison. Obscene, you say. But it's good for boxing. What happens when athletic kids learn they can make £5m... for fighting Audley Harrison? There comes the next generation.

Okay then, the Klitschkos; Haye will fight a Klitschko brother, probably in 2011, maybe in 2012, but it will happen. Such a wait is nothing new. Be patient.

After Evander Holyfield defeated Mike Tyson in 1996 it was clear that Holyfield and Lennox Lewis were the world's best heavyweights. They didn't fight until 1999, and all because boxing is business.

The Klitschkos have made good money fighting overmatched opponents for years but are making a stink at Haye doing the same now. The truth is that the Ukrainian brothers need Haye more than he needs them.

Vitali and Wladimir have never beaten any top-level opponents and they want to fight Haye to secure some sort of legacy. Well, if they want him immediately, they must make him an offer he can't refuse. And when Haye is making £5m-plus against Harrison, that offer needs to be serious money.

Haye has earned the right to maximise his income. He took risky fights overseas to defeat first Mormeck and then "Sugar" Nikolai Valuev for world titles and is only now making the big money his hard work deserves.

Anyone who claims they wouldn't make the same sensible financial choices as Haye in his position is either an idiot or a liar.

And, in making the choice to fight Harrison, Haye is only following in the tradition of heavyweight champions, not breaking it. Boxing has always been business.

Jack Dempsey defended his title just four times between 1921 and 1926 whilst raking it in through endorsements and Hollywood movies.

Floyd Patterson and Ingemar Johansson both fought only once a year in 1959, 1960 and 1961 and every time against each other for the world title. This was because of the then crippling marginal tax rate in the US.

The wilful naivety adopted by the naysayers as to the nature of the fight game is tedious in the extreme.

Boxing is business. Haye-Harrison is good business. And good business is great for British boxing.

This fight is a mismatch, whatever the outcome, it will be bad for boxing. Lewis v Bruno was a fight between two top 10 ranked heavyweights. Harrison wouldn't even have been in the top 30 back then, in fact, he's not in the top 10 now, or certainly shouldnt be

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 11:34
by Wake up call
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Kilsby wrote:Its not a english piece! :lol:
Yes, it is. If it's supposed to be journalism that is. If it's actually supposed to be a crock of dung - or some attempt at parody - fine.

I only picked that bit out because of the irony.

It's appalling in almost every respect. It's the type of sh1t established print writers (the dinosaurs amongst them) can point at and justify their criticisms of web hacks.
I agree generally with Ian. From a journalistic point of view the BoxingNews24 piece is badly written, over the top and self-indulgent. Personally I hate articles that do not contain quotes from the parties involved unless it's a fight report or breaking news. It also commits the cardinal sin of being in first person.

This said, I'd give the chap a bit of slack. I am by no means an expert on journalism practice, but I've learned enough over the years to know a few dos and don'ts. When I started out I wrote a few of these terrible opinion pieces (I cringe now over them) so I know this guy can improve if he wants to but he needs to learn a few basic points. A) Opinion is for people who have earned the right to give it or have authority in what they are speaking about. B) Readers do not give a shit about who writes the article, they are only interested in the quality of its content and the line about his fans the writer includes in the piece is just laughable. And finally C) Articles need to have an element of balance and objectivity. They should not just be pieces of crap written to stroke your own ego.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 12:09
by Counter-puncher
SteveDow wrote:
Carl Froch still labours in that kind of obscurity due to inept matchmaking and promotion. Froch challenges Arthur Abraham this month, his fifth world-class opponent in a row.

.
now, saying Froch's MATCHMAKING is inept, is pure idiocy.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 12:10
by Chambers2
Carl Froch still labours in that kind of obscurity due to inept matchmaking and promotion.
WTF! If Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler is inept matchmaking then I wish all our fighters were ineptly matched

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 12:11
by Chambers2
Counter-puncher wrote:
SteveDow wrote:
Carl Froch still labours in that kind of obscurity due to inept matchmaking and promotion. Froch challenges Arthur Abraham this month, his fifth world-class opponent in a row.

.
now, saying Froch's MATCHMAKING is inept, is pure idiocy.
Well said :D

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 12:27
by bruthead
Well, Froch has had bigger problems from poor promotion than poor matchmaking but the matchmaking in his last two fights was poor. Pascal and Taylor no doubt was good matchmaking although the Taylor win was a bit too close for comfort.

But then you have Froch, a new world champ in his first defence at home, wanting to put on a show to the hometown fans, and he gets Andre Dirrell? Horrible, exactly the wrong fighter to make Froch look good. Then he has to fight Kessler...in Denmark...despite being the champion? Horrible, again. It was a good fight but bad matchmaking, obviously, because he lost his belt.

I know Dirrell and Kessler was because of the Super Six but those fights were bad matchmaking in my opinion. Froch was the world champion, he had the belt and a chance to break through to the mainstream. Now he doesn't have the belt and hasn't broken through. Bad matchmaking played a part in him missing this big chance.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 12:58
by jamesmcdonnell
bruthead wrote:Well, Froch has had bigger problems from poor promotion than poor matchmaking but the matchmaking in his last two fights was poor. Pascal and Taylor no doubt was good matchmaking although the Taylor win was a bit too close for comfort.

But then you have Froch, a new world champ in his first defence at home, wanting to put on a show to the hometown fans, and he gets Andre Dirrell? Horrible, exactly the wrong fighter to make Froch look good. Then he has to fight Kessler...in Denmark...despite being the champion? Horrible, again. It was a good fight but bad matchmaking, obviously, because he lost his belt.

I know Dirrell and Kessler was because of the Super Six but those fights were bad matchmaking in my opinion. Froch was the world champion, he had the belt and a chance to break through to the mainstream. Now he doesn't have the belt and hasn't broken through. Bad matchmaking played a part in him missing this big chance.
Ive always thought the super 6 was a bad idea. Especially for the fighters involved. Too many hard fights in a row. It has effectively ended Jermaine Taylors career.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 13:02
by doctorboxing
Wake up call wrote: I agree generally with Ian. From a journalistic point of view the BoxingNews24 piece is badly written, over the top and self-endulgent.
That should be "indulgent" you awful web hack ;;-)

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 13:28
by bruthead
jamesmcdonnell wrote: Ive always thought the super 6 was a bad idea. Especially for the fighters involved. Too many hard fights in a row. It has effectively ended Jermaine Taylors career.
Exactly:

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/03112010/ ... ather.html

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 13:40
by Wake up call
doctorboxing wrote:
Wake up call wrote: I agree generally with Ian. From a journalistic point of view the BoxingNews24 piece is badly written, over the top and self-endulgent.
That should be "indulgent" you awful web hack ;;-)
It's only a forum though and that wasn't really the point.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 15:29
by MightyWarrior
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Bit naughty posting that without the link:

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/11112010/ ... rison.html
Very true, you have to credit the writer. By James Garner ? Instread of Pugilist he should call it the Rockford Files.
Excellent article I thought, very well argued, I ended up agreeing with him.

As for the Froch point, I think he's saying Carl is fighting a murderer's row and not getting publicity, TV, money or recognition. All in all, not good.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 15:33
by n1ebf
Total Tripe.

Re: Great Article on why Haye v Harrison is a great match up.

Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 15:37
by doctorboxing
Wake up call wrote:
doctorboxing wrote:
Wake up call wrote: I agree generally with Ian. From a journalistic point of view the BoxingNews24 piece is badly written, over the top and self-endulgent.
That should be "indulgent" you awful web hack ;;-)
It's only a forum though and that wasn't really the point.
Sarcasm indicated by the wink eye smiley, which is really the best you can do on the internet...........