BoxRec

Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler, Abraham is some run of fights, certainly makes better reading than Joe's only one decent win on his record against a young and green Kessler.

just a shame Froch doesn't have Warren's PR machine and a load of gullible boyos to lap it up, otherwise he'd be a living legend with that record.

Hagler2002 wrote:Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler, Abraham is some run of fights, certainly makes better reading than Joe's only one decent win on his record against a young and green Kessler.

Junk post.

sg1985 wrote:Kessler was green now? Come on.

Yes green, show me the unification and world level opponents he'd been in with before he fought 'Super Joe'

Jon Saxon wrote:

Hagler2002 wrote:Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler, Abraham is some run of fights, certainly makes better reading than Joe's only one decent win on his record against a young and green Kessler.

Junk post.

Of course it is

Its all a lie.

Froch doesn't need to tag himself to Calzaghe's name.

Carl just said he is up against Glen Johnson next and then Ward in the final.

Win those, and they are winnable, then move up to get it on with Pascal! Some run of fights that would be.

Hagler2002 wrote:Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler, Abraham is some run of fights, certainly makes better reading than Joe's only one decent win on his record against a young and green Kessler.

Troll post ... again ...

Froch has built a solid resume now, can't think of many fighters from the UK with as many top class wins.

Was a troll post, but Frochy has got a better resume than JC, hands down.

Calzaghe UD still though.

Absolutely. Calzaghe's legacy needs to be viewed for what it was.

Froch has shown Calzaghe up, despite Kessler's win.

jBacca wrote:Was a troll post, but Frochy has got a better resume than JC, hands down.

Calzaghe UD still though.

For me bacca, Frochy still has to establish himself as the man to match Calzaghe. That said his wins are excellent. Could have even got the decision vs Kessler. Plus had a ton of injuries in the build up and couldn't pull out- which you never hear him moaning about. Calzaghe would have beaten though i think.

sendo wrote:just a shame Froch doesn't have Warren's PR machine and a load of gullible boyos to lap it up, otherwise he'd be a living legend with that record.

Doubt he would have faced the same opponents had he been with FW to be honest.

super joe was never as good as this run of opposition


im not saying carls better im just saying calrs took and won some fights that joe wouldnt go near

Jeff Thomas wrote:

jBacca wrote:Was a troll post, but Frochy has got a better resume than JC, hands down.

Calzaghe UD still though.

For me bacca, Frochy still has to establish himself as the man to match Calzaghe. That said his wins are excellent. Could have even got the decision vs Kessler. Plus had a ton of injuries in the build up and couldn't pull out- which you never hear him moaning about. Calzaghe would have beaten though i think.

I think Frochy needs a couple more big wins to get anywhere near the legacy JC has left. I think Froch has the better resume, but Calzaghe is the bigger superstar.

"I think Frochy needs a couple more big wins to get anywhere near the legacy JC has left. I think Froch has the better resume, but Calzaghe is the bigger superstar."


thats a bullshit statement , the first part is your answer

Hagler2002 wrote:Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler, Abraham is some run of fights, certainly makes better reading than Joe's only one decent win on his record against a young and green Kessler.

Taylor was old and winning until the last 10 seconds of the fight, and he lost to dirrell and Kessler - so whats your point?

Kessler was green lol if anything you could say he had ring rust against froch and still won.

hagman1989 wrote:"I think Frochy needs a couple more big wins to get anywhere near the legacy JC has left. I think Froch has the better resume, but Calzaghe is the bigger superstar."


thats a bullshit statement , the first part is your answer

More people on the street will know JC over Froch. Calzaghe has left a bigger impression on the public.

Froch has the better resume though, imo.

jBacca wrote:

hagman1989 wrote:"I think Frochy needs a couple more big wins to get anywhere near the legacy JC has left. I think Froch has the better resume, but Calzaghe is the bigger superstar."


thats a bullshit statement , the first part is your answer

More people on the street will know JC over Froch. Calzaghe has left a bigger impression on the public.

Froch has the better resume though, imo.

this is about fighters fornicate the public and there crowd drawing , its about fighters and who they fight and carls out stripped joe and easilly

hagman1989 wrote:

jBacca wrote:

hagman1989 wrote:"I think Frochy needs a couple more big wins to get anywhere near the legacy JC has left. I think Froch has the better resume, but Calzaghe is the bigger superstar."


thats a bullshit statement , the first part is your answer

More people on the street will know JC over Froch. Calzaghe has left a bigger impression on the public.

Froch has the better resume though, imo.

this is about fighters eff the public and there crowd drawing , its about fighters and who they fight and carls out stripped joe and easilly

I've said that Froch has the better resume three times now.

Why do people still feel the need to compare the two?

Can't we just say they're both top drawer fighters and we should be proud of them?

sg1985 wrote:

SweetLikeSugar wrote:Why do people still feel the need to compare the two?

Can't we just say they're both top drawer fighters and we should be proud of them?

Don't come in here with your reasoned thought.

Well I've just got in from work and cracked open a cold one, I'll come back in an hour and post some drunken drivel.

kingfinn wrote:

Hagler2002 wrote:Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler, Abraham is some run of fights, certainly makes better reading than Joe's only one decent win on his record against a young and green Kessler.

Taylor was old and winning until the last 10 seconds of the fight, and he lost to dirrell and Kessler - so whats your point?

Kessler was green lol if anything you could say he had ring rust against froch and still won.

I stopped reading when you said he lost to Dirrell.

he came back like a true champion defeating an extremely live opponent

calzaghe wasnt a world player like froch 2x wbc real deal world champ

jBacca wrote:Was a troll post, but Frochy has got a better resume than JC, hands down.

Calzaghe UD still though.

How is it a troll post? Show me a fighter in the world today apart from Pacquiao with a better level of opponent in their last five fights?