BoxRec

Why is a two time champion, with an extensive record, ranked below a guy who's never been world champion, who has actually lost to Froch?

I think the system has a flux capacitor issue.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxRe ... escription

It's stats with no subjectivity so you will always get crazy-seeming anomalies.

The alternative is to introduce some element of subjectivity to it, which isn't the idea.

G0mez wrote:Why is a two time champion, with an extensive record, ranked below a guy who's never been world champion, who has actually lost to Froch?

I think the system has a flux capacitor issue.

I agree, not a flawless system and there is no way Dirrell should be ahead of Froch, based on past performances, fine acting jobs and rubbish excuses as to why he had to withdraw from the Super Six.

Now if Boxrec rankings take those things into account, then maybe he should be ahead of them all?

bengulnaci1 wrote:
Now if Boxrec rankings take those things into account

How?

Sorry, I was attempting to be ironic.....and failing badly

bengulnaci1 wrote:Sorry, I was attempting to be ironic.....and failing badly