Page 1 of 1

Lion's Den, post fight report! VIPBOXING.COM!

Posted: 28 Nov 2010, 17:22
by Jamie Albrecht

Re: Lion's Den, post fight report! VIPBOXING.COM!

Posted: 28 Nov 2010, 17:28
by slapbangwhallop
Jamie, How did you score the fight?

I did an article for the local Barnsley rag and scored it 96-94. I scored Rose the last round but it could have gone to Noble if he kept the workrate going in the last 30 second and that would have made it a draw.

Boxing News scored the fight for Noble.

Re: Lion's Den, post fight report! VIPBOXING.COM!

Posted: 28 Nov 2010, 17:37
by jBacca
Is it just me or does anyone else get a 'shop at Boxrec' icon across the first paragraph of the article?

Re: Lion's Den, post fight report! VIPBOXING.COM!

Posted: 28 Nov 2010, 17:43
by Jamie Albrecht
slapbangwhallop wrote:
Jamie, How did you score the fight?

I did an article for the local Barnsley rag and scored it 96-94. I scored Rose the last round but it could have gone to Noble if he kept the workrate going in the last 30 second and that would have made it a draw.

Boxing News scored the fight for Noble.
I had Rose up by 2 rounds at the end, but i do understand the favouring of noble, was refreshing to see that he was not just at the fight to make up the numbers, genuinely coming to win and showing true aggression... I had the fight at 96-94, but openly agree that this was not a brilliant rose performance, he simply fared better in the final 3 rounds, helping him nick it. don't understand how 2 judges scored a shut-out.

Re: Lion's Den, post fight report! VIPBOXING.COM!

Posted: 29 Nov 2010, 05:26
by dondada
jBacca wrote:Is it just me or does anyone else get a 'shop at Boxrec' icon across the first paragraph of the article?
Hopefully just you mate. I've had a look and it's fine here.

Re: Lion's Den, post fight report! VIPBOXING.COM!

Posted: 29 Nov 2010, 07:22
by jBacca
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
jBacca wrote:Is it just me or does anyone else get a 'shop at Boxrec' icon across the first paragraph of the article?
Hopefully just you mate. I've had a look and it's fine here.
Just had a go with IE and the article was fine. Must be a Firefox issue.