Your SMW top 5
Posted: 03 Dec 2010, 19:29
I posted this on the CS. Just wondering what everyone here thinks of the situation.
There have been a couple important fights at 168 recently. I would like to see what your top 5 looks like.
Mine:
1. Froch
2. Ward
3. Kessler
4. Bute
5. Dirrell
I understand how it would seem odd (and if you are going to bitch to me about it, at least post your own list with explanations) that Froch is ahead of Kessler and Ward, considering he lost to Kessler, and Ward dominated the Viking Warrior. However, I do not think head to head results are the be all end all when it comes to ranking fighters (not to mention Froch-Kessler could have gone either way). Too much emphasis is placed on maintaining a perfect record nowadays, which has led to an abundance of over protected fighters in the contemporary boxing scene. You lose and your ranking or status drops, usually even in the case of a very close, competitive loss. Froch has one of the best recent resumes in boxing with wins over Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, and AA. As mentioned previously, his lone defeat was also to an excellent fighter, in an excellent fight which could have gone either way. I have Ward ahead of Kessler due to the dominating nature of his win, as well as clear victories over lower top ten/fifteen opponents like Green, Bika, and Miranda.
Bute is at number four because I do not think his level of opposition is commensurate with the fighters above him. Froch and Kessler have competed with better guys, and Ward's win over Kessler is far more significant than anything Bute has done. I believe one of the reasons people have trouble ranking him outside the top two because he has an unbeaten record, while the guys below him in many lists (everyone but Ward) do not. This also helps maintain the illusion that a bout between Bute and the SS winner would to a certain extent be a "super fight." Dirrell takes the fifth spot due to his competitive loss (not a robbery) to Froch and the win over AA.
There have been a couple important fights at 168 recently. I would like to see what your top 5 looks like.
Mine:
1. Froch
2. Ward
3. Kessler
4. Bute
5. Dirrell
I understand how it would seem odd (and if you are going to bitch to me about it, at least post your own list with explanations) that Froch is ahead of Kessler and Ward, considering he lost to Kessler, and Ward dominated the Viking Warrior. However, I do not think head to head results are the be all end all when it comes to ranking fighters (not to mention Froch-Kessler could have gone either way). Too much emphasis is placed on maintaining a perfect record nowadays, which has led to an abundance of over protected fighters in the contemporary boxing scene. You lose and your ranking or status drops, usually even in the case of a very close, competitive loss. Froch has one of the best recent resumes in boxing with wins over Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, and AA. As mentioned previously, his lone defeat was also to an excellent fighter, in an excellent fight which could have gone either way. I have Ward ahead of Kessler due to the dominating nature of his win, as well as clear victories over lower top ten/fifteen opponents like Green, Bika, and Miranda.
Bute is at number four because I do not think his level of opposition is commensurate with the fighters above him. Froch and Kessler have competed with better guys, and Ward's win over Kessler is far more significant than anything Bute has done. I believe one of the reasons people have trouble ranking him outside the top two because he has an unbeaten record, while the guys below him in many lists (everyone but Ward) do not. This also helps maintain the illusion that a bout between Bute and the SS winner would to a certain extent be a "super fight." Dirrell takes the fifth spot due to his competitive loss (not a robbery) to Froch and the win over AA.