Page 1 of 2
Hey Bennie...
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 12:29
by Priff
Cast your mind back a few weeks....
On a thread in the Current Forum (which I now refer to as the Graveyard

), there was a thread in which Naz's
comeback was mentioned.
You said something to the effect of, "Naz is never coming back. He has in fact got himself into a lot of trouble, you'll find out about it soon".
Well, 'soon' has come and gone and I certainly am none the wiser. So Bennie, are you gonna tell us what is was? Come on man, give us a clue. What's the dirty jug-eared one gone and done?
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 12:32
by bennie
I can't mention it because I'll get sued. But it's all going to come out soon and it's going to be big. Hopefully, you can work it out if I give you a few clues, however. Think of a bizarre incident earlier this year that in the end came to nought, but was taken very seriously by the police.
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 12:34
by knockout
edited to protect the innocent
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 12:35
by Kilburn
Woah shit.
This isn't sounding good.
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 12:36
by knockout
Kilburn wrote:Woah shit.
This isn't sounding good.
not at all..... heard a few whispers myself but thought nothing of it....but if Bennie has heard something similar then....
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 12:45
by jamesmcdonnell
Oh my god, surely not! Just worked it out!
Do you mean he was the one who bummed paul daniels?
Seriously though, I have just worked it out, that sounds ludicrous to me, I mean why on earth?
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 12:53
by bennie
If you look at the history: the much publicised fighter-trainer split, the fighter's once dazzling career then petering out, the former friend and fellow fighter staying with the trainer and enjoying more success...
Of course, this is all pure speculation.

Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 12:59
by Priff
knockout wrote:involving an "**********" gentleman.....
I was thinking more along the lines of "man on goat relations" (the forbidden love)
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:00
by Priff
JUST WORKED IT OUT AS WELL. Blimmey.
Knockout, perhaps you should delete your post mate.
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:03
by Priff
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Do you mean he was the one who bummed paul daniels?
Now I don't care how in depth the boxing talk has been on here, this is post of the day by a country mile. End of.
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:03
by TerribleTerry
My God - awesome. Almost unbelievable.
Lets hope the story breaks soon...
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:31
by Kilburn
There's always one...
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:33
by knockout
Kilburn wrote:There's always one...
exactly... edit that post knockout artist
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:36
by knockout artist
Sorry chaps, got a bit carried away.
However, I only asked a question. I didnt make a statement.
It cant be true though, can it?
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:41
by bennie
knockout artist wrote:Sorry chaps, got a bit carried away.
However, I only asked a question. I didnt make a statement.
It cant be true though, can it?
I scrubbed your earlier post, KO Artist. We don't want a weekend like Eastside just had.
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:43
by knockout
knockout artist wrote:Sorry chaps, got a bit carried away.
However, I only asked a question. I didnt make a statement.
It cant be true though, can it?
time will tell but me and bennie heard the same rumours...
where there is smoke there is fire as they say
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:45
by Guest
bennie wrote:knockout artist wrote:Sorry chaps, got a bit carried away.
However, I only asked a question. I didnt make a statement.
It cant be true though, can it?
I scrubbed your earlier post, KO Artist. We don't want a weekend like Eastside just had.
Agreed. I'd be a tad careful with this topic chaps. I dont see how you can speculate in a discussion like this without landing yourselves in the shit.
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:51
by Priff
Can we remove this thread?
I know we don't want a thread removing culture like other forums, but it seems pretty sensible in this instance. Now we've edited our posts, the thread doesn't even make any sense anyway.
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 13:57
by adamiw
i dont believe the story at all. I can see how it would become a rumour, but only because it would be such a great, unique story.
Bennie, do you believe it?
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 14:03
by Hardhitters11
Would be amazed if its true but ya never know...
HH
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 14:03
by bennie
adamiw wrote:i dont believe the story at all. I can see how it would become a rumour, but only because it would be such a great, unique story.
Bennie, do you believe it?
Yes.
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 14:05
by jamesmcdonnell
Bennie, maybe it would be prudent to remove this entire thread, just to be on the safe side, or people should confine their speculations to private messages?
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 14:07
by Twinkle Toes
I thought of Mathew Kelly at first lol
Then I figured it..I think :)
Posted: 03 Dec 2003, 14:08
by adamiw
bennie wrote:adamiw wrote:i dont believe the story at all. I can see how it would become a rumour, but only because it would be such a great, unique story.
Bennie, do you believe it?
Yes.
why? How much detail do you know and are the sources reliable.
It just sounds like something out of a film, mind you it has always miffed me why would someone do that to the boxer concerned (who you have away way to easily

) I mean what would you do with him.
I dont think the threats were all what they were, threats, and they did their job.
BTW, why would you get sued? people all over the web are talking about the Prince Charles thing.
Posted: 04 Dec 2003, 01:14
by mrbassie
Twinkle Toes wrote:I thought of Mathew Kelly at first lol
Then I figured it..I think :)
I
knew it!!!! Hamed put up the money to rig stars in their eyes!!!!!