Page 1 of 3

Webb v Pryce

Posted: 23 Dec 2010, 15:14
by el torro
5th of Feb, Pryce is in for Prince Arron.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 23 Dec 2010, 16:54
by Terrrrry
Why has Prince Aaron withdrawn?

Really fancied Webb/Aaron to be a good, intruiging little scrap.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 23 Dec 2010, 17:08
by supacook2k
cant wait for this. just received a message of pryce confirming it. hope pryce wins it.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 23 Dec 2010, 17:24
by gmanji
Webb will box his ears off. Then Brian Rose will beat the winner.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 23 Dec 2010, 17:51
by Grays_Dan
Where is this?

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 23 Dec 2010, 18:32
by Gavler
gmanji wrote:Webb will box his ears off. Then Brian Rose will beat the winner.

Are you Joking :lol:. Agree with the first bit but not the secound

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 23 Dec 2010, 18:49
by tonyevs
... so why did he only recently move down?

Would have prefered for Pryce to stay at welter. But a title chance is too good to turn down.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 23 Dec 2010, 19:15
by boxer111
webb will win this easy price is shit dont even deserve the shot he's just a gate keeper

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 24 Dec 2010, 02:33
by sugar sweet 1
tonyevs wrote:... so why did he only recently move down?

Would have prefered for Pryce to stay at welter. But a title chance is too good to turn down.

couldnt say no to this fight mate,welter or light-middle,il get to where i want to be,seems im gonna shock a few people when i beat webb.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 24 Dec 2010, 05:01
by bennie
Busy Sam Webb defends his British light-middleweight title against perennial Welsh threat Bradley Pryce in Brentwood on February 5.
Webb is desperate to win a Lonsdale Belt outright since lifting it last year with an upset decision over Anthony Small. The popular Londoner retained with an impressive eleven-round knockout of Leicester's gutsy Martin Concepcion in October and now for the dangerous and dangerously unpredictable Pryce, who also holds wins over Small and Concepcion (both emphatic stoppages) and earned his shot with a solid decision over former Prizefighter winner Michael Lomax last month in Newport to take his record to 31-8 (18).
Pryce can do it all on his best nights but then he has nights when he is eminently beatable, and you wonder if his time has past after 11 hard years as a pro, although you write him off at your peril. Nevertheless, the clever, aggressive Webb looks likely to grind out a decision.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 24 Dec 2010, 05:10
by sugar sweet 1
bennie wrote:Busy Sam Webb defends his British light-middleweight title against perennial Welsh threat Bradley Pryce in Brentwood on February 5.
Webb is desperate to win a Lonsdale Belt outright since lifting it last year with an upset decision over Anthony Small. The popular Londoner retained with an impressive eleven-round knockout of Leicester's gutsy Martin Concepcion in October and now for the dangerous and dangerously unpredictable Pryce, who also holds wins over Small and Concepcion (both emphatic stoppages) and earned his shot with a solid decision over former Prizefighter winner Michael Lomax last month in Newport to take his record to 31-8 (18).
Pryce can do it all on his best nights but then he has nights when he is eminently beatable, and you wonder if his time has past after 11 hard years as a pro, although you write him off at your peril. Nevertheless, the clever, aggressive Webb looks likely to grind out a decision.

im the best i have EVER been,my record looks dodgy but thats because i have always been the yes man to any fight,but when i said yes to this fight its for all the right reasons. people can write me off but on the 5th of feb i will become the new champ.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 24 Dec 2010, 05:16
by bennie
You will do well, Bradley. :TU:

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 24 Dec 2010, 05:23
by Scottrf
Let's hope 'The Pryce is right' :TU:

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 24 Dec 2010, 05:46
by boxer111
lol @ pryce u said that every month for the last 5 years your a joke webb will smash u into retirement

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 24 Dec 2010, 05:50
by Scottrf
boxer111 wrote:lol @ pryce u said that every month for the last 5 years your a joke webb will smash u into retirement
Don't like crediting these keyboard warriors with a response but it's interesting how they never have more than a few posts to their name.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 24 Dec 2010, 06:18
by tonyevs
Scottrf wrote:
boxer111 wrote:lol @ pryce u said that every month for the last 5 years your a joke webb will smash u into retirement
Don't like crediting these keyboard warriors with a response but it's interesting how they never have more than a few posts to their name.
Very often its a different account to slag people off they are too scared of meeting ....tossers!

All the best Brad. Just stay away from the beer & leave the chocolate to Jenna and the kids..

Merry Xmas

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 24 Dec 2010, 11:16
by jonp
boxer111 wrote:lol @ pryce u said that every month for the last 5 years your a joke webb will smash u into retirement
Total knob

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 24 Dec 2010, 13:54
by Adam1991
Brian Rose Was Offered It First Apparently But Wouldnt Take The Fight On 5 Weeks Notice And Also Has A Hand Injury

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 25 Dec 2010, 10:01
by liamlion
Good luck Bradley. Train hard, well and properly and you give yourself everychance :TU:

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 26 Dec 2010, 05:05
by FtmPress
Grays_Dan wrote:Where is this?
Feb 5 at brentwood Price will be support fight every british heavyweight who has be offered Price has turn him down.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 26 Dec 2010, 05:16
by Old bones Ian
Pryce could be a banana skin for Webb, if Pryce comes into the fight fully prepared and fit he stands a chance.
In the past few years its only Hall that has done a number on Pryce, and Hall could KO anyone he hit cleanly.

Webb looked good last time out, and should keep improving. But he does mark up and if Pryce gets into a rythum then he can cause a few problems, cuts may come into this.

I'm still going for the boxer on the way up Webb to win in about 10 rounds, but he won't have it all his own way.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 26 Dec 2010, 05:41
by Lightsoot
I like Pryce for this providing he trains properly and maintains his focus. Webb has improved but I didn't think he did enough to merit the decision against Anthony Small and he beat a very limited Martin Concepcion to retain.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 26 Dec 2010, 07:06
by stujones
Cannot help but think "why" is this for the right reasons. Bradley has been mentioning since the Hall fight that he is going to campaign at Welter - so why moving back up?

I fear the right reasons is cause of the lack of opportunities at Welter.

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 26 Dec 2010, 07:22
by 1southpaw
stujones wrote:Cannot help but think "why" is this for the right reasons. Bradley has been mentioning since the Hall fight that he is going to campaign at Welter - so why moving back up?

I fear the right reasons is cause of the lack of opportunities at Welter.
but even if Pryce gets beat he could still get a shot at the British title at welter ???

Re: Webb v Pryce

Posted: 27 Dec 2010, 04:11
by sugar sweet 1
stujones wrote:Cannot help but think "why" is this for the right reasons. Bradley has been mentioning since the Hall fight that he is going to campaign at Welter - so why moving back up?

I fear the right reasons is cause of the lack of opportunities at Welter.


im a welterweight.but i do feel feel ok at light-middle with the extra weight,would of loved to be offered a title fight at welterweight,but happy was given a shot at light-middle,i stepped up for the commonwealth title and stayed in division for 6 years,il do same again when i win british title,i would like to end my career at welter so il go back down when iv won the title outright, :bag: :bag: :bag: