Apology regarding my error in the case of Crease
Posted: 12 Jan 2011, 14:56
In the past I have mistakenly described Crease as "verticle".
However I now stand corrected, and apologize for any confusion I may have caused with my error.
Apparently "horizontal" would be closer to actuality according to the easy to read graph displayed below.
If a class action suit is filed, be assured that their will be enough in the fund to satisfy all litigants.
Once again, my sincere apologies to any an all who were left in the lurch based on my lapse of judgment in making this apparently false claim.
However it is a FACT that crease's place in the BRS Hierarchy is actually BELOW the buttock. Something that I suspected, and has now been confirmed.
However I now stand corrected, and apologize for any confusion I may have caused with my error.
Apparently "horizontal" would be closer to actuality according to the easy to read graph displayed below.
If a class action suit is filed, be assured that their will be enough in the fund to satisfy all litigants.
Once again, my sincere apologies to any an all who were left in the lurch based on my lapse of judgment in making this apparently false claim.
However it is a FACT that crease's place in the BRS Hierarchy is actually BELOW the buttock. Something that I suspected, and has now been confirmed.
