Hey Guys, I know i'll cop it for this, because I am a bit biased cos we're family, but the best Aussie i have seen live has to be "Slim" yes our very own Lionel Rose, even in his pre world title fight days at Festival hall Melbourne where he beat some terrific fighters, he was spectacular to watch and i'm sure if anyone in here is old enough to have seen him live, you would agree?
Who can forget on Dec 11, 1967 in Sydney when he just demolished the Rock, for the Australian 118 pound (8st-6lb) title, this was a fight that everyone said was a 50/50 fight.
Just a little side story, Gattellari a couple of years prior, really ripped into Lional & Jack at Leo Berry's gym in Richmond after Lionel had the better of him in a spar, Lionel at that stage could still make Flyweight, so they challenged the Rock for his Australian Flyweight title, but the following tirade of abuse and threat he will never be in the same league as him etc etc, meant the fight would not happen, well for another couple years at anyway, but this time it was for Lionel's bantamweight title, and Gattellari was the Challenger, the rest is history.
Johnny Lewis, who was in Lionel's corner that night, tells some terrific stories about the lead-up to the fight, at weigh-in etc etc and what went on and where he thinks the fight was won and lost etc, if you ever get the chance to ask Johnny about it, do so, cos it's really interesting stuff.
Lionel was spectacular to watch live, his hand & foot skills were something else, and then on February 27, 1968, he lost his best kept secret tag by travelling to Tokyo and doing what many thought was the impossible, by defeating the human thrashing machine in Masahiko "Fighting" Harada.
Then his defence against Alan Rudkin at Kooyong was pretty special, I am sure that many would agree with me, also many would not, and as i said, I know im a little bias, but for those who did see Lionel live, I'm sure you would agree, he was something special.
I am not saying Lionel was the best fighter, (even tho i think he was) I'm saying he was the best to watch live, also he fought some damn good fighters like Olivares who was 51-0 with 50 ko's, he also went to Olivares backyard to fight him, that's courage.
check his record:
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Now as i said, whether Lionel was the best to watch live? is debatable and who amongst us really is qualified enough to know, but in my eyes he was.
Also, In the same era, I think Fammo was maybe even more skilled than Lionel, I boxed Fammo hundred of rounds at Ambrose Palmer's gym underneath Festival Hall, and his skill level was something special as well, He was just so hard to hit and his immaculate fitness mean't that he could fight at that pace all night, whether it be 10 or 15 rounds back then, but sadly, his fighting style was not as popular as Lionel's because of his defensive style of "hit and not be hit" but he was one of the most skillful boxer's i have ever seen.
Another two who come to mind were Tony Mundine and Graeme "Porky" Brooke, Porky is also family and again, I may be showing some favoritism, but his skills and style were really good to watch.
While Tony Mundine was explosive and spectacular to watch, i know someone in here said that Anthony was the best they'd seen, and this maybe so for this day and age, but he was not as spectacular as his Father, nor did he ever fight the level of fighter's his dad did, but to be fair,we are in different era's.
We also need to remember the level of comeptition between these guys, back in the 70's the level of opposition (in my opinion) was far greater then than it is today, there were more registered fighter's and no shortage of anyone to fight.
Tony Mundine fought some really good fighters and while he was beaten a few times, he had a go and avoided no-one, unlike some of the fighters today where, they will not fight anyone who's in their way, on the way up, they will often wait until they are not in their way and on their way down, Tony only fought 9 or 10 blokes with a losing record, out of 96 fights, that's not too bad, and shows the level of competition wa stronger with more fighters available.
Tony's record of 96 fights, 80 wins, 15 losses was over a 15 year span in probably one of the hardest and best era's of the sport in Australia, and Choc's is presently at 10 years, Will he get to 15 years? I doubt it, but he helped create another very good era for our sport, whether it was as competitive, i dont know, one thing i do know, Choc was marketed better and made huge more dollars than Tony ever did.
This is just an opinion, i'm not saying i'm right, but check the records of Tony and Choc, and make your own conclusion
Tony:
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Anthony:
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
I'm not taking anything away from Choc, because it's in a different era, also there was no grubby little manager who controlled Tony and everything he said and did.
Tony just did the fighting and left the other stuff to Ernie, huge difference between the two.
Just my two bobs worth guys.
Brad