Page 1 of 2
pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 09 Feb 2011, 16:53
by oscar
just read article on boxscore saying pryce v lynes is on, good match?
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 09 Feb 2011, 17:04
by hurlock
pryce is never in a dull fight is he :!:
i fancy lynes, as he's fresher & i think will be fitter & stronger at welter.i think pryce is on the slide.
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 09 Feb 2011, 17:15
by leforge
Pryce will stop lynes! Be good warm up for mainfight.
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 09 Feb 2011, 18:27
by DavidPayne
Two of my favs....this will be a classic.
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 09 Feb 2011, 23:27
by sugar sweet 1
leforge wrote:Pryce will stop lynes! Be good warm up for mainfight.
i like your thinking.
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 10 Feb 2011, 05:36
by Tommy Gunn13
Should be a decent fight,i slightly favour Pryce...could be the end of the road for the loser
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 13:47
by oscar
Excellent win for Lynes on what turned out to be a good show, how far can he go?
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 14:04
by Des1
oscar wrote:Excellent win for Lynes on what turned out to be a good show, how far can he go?
Points or stoppage? Good result either way
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 14:18
by Kit
Did Lynes - Pryce actually happen, if so why did Sky not show it? Or was Lynes in with someone else?
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 14:21
by oscar
Lynes beat Pryce clearly on points in a good scrap, no idea why sky chose to ignore it, ref scored it rather closer than me 78-76 i believe
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 14:34
by gobbles
oscar wrote:Lynes beat Pryce clearly on points in a good scrap, no idea why sky chose to ignore it, ref scored it rather closer than me 36-38 i believe
was it a 4-rounder?
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 14:41
by palooka
They are both class boxers; don't understand why a 4 rounder was necessary.
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 14:48
by oscar
simon fox wrote:They are both class boxers; don't understand why a 4 rounder was necessary.
8 rounds
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 15:05
by Finch
Pryce should retire.
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 15:43
by Adamj1987
I think lynes is too small and pryce has too much left
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 15:44
by Finch
Adamj1987 wrote:I think lynes is too small and pryce has too much left
?
Pryce lost to Lynes last night.
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 15:47
by Tommy Gunn13
Whoever lost this fight could end there career...Looks like Pryce has nowhere to go now..
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 15:48
by Horse
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Whoever lost this fight could end there career...Looks like Pryce has nowhere to go now..
Why does it look like Pryce has nowhere to go?
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 15:56
by Adamj1987
Finch wrote:Adamj1987 wrote:I think lynes is too small and pryce has too much left
?
Pryce lost to Lynes last night.
my bad thought the fight was next week
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 16:07
by Tommy Gunn13
Horse wrote:Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Whoever lost this fight could end there career...Looks like Pryce has nowhere to go now..
Why does it look like Pryce has nowhere to go?
Because there both seen better days..a fight where i thought its game over for the loser(at a title level)
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 16:09
by kevo
Adamj1987 wrote:I think lynes is too small and pryce has too much left
Oh Adam, you silly noob.
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 16:21
by Horse
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Because there both seen better days..a fight where i thought its game over for the loser(at a title level)
He only lost by one point and there aren't many British fighters ranked above Pryce at Light Middlweight.
Concepcion got a British title shot, so why couldn't Pryce? Who else can Webb defend his title against?
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 16:24
by Tommy Gunn13
Horse wrote:Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Because there both seen better days..a fight where i thought its game over for the loser(at a title level)
He only lost by one point and there aren't many British fighters ranked above Pryce at Light Middlweight.
Concepcion got a British title shot, so why couldn't Pryce? Who else can Webb defend his title against?
I thought he was a welterweight now....
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 16:26
by Horse
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Horse wrote:Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Because there both seen better days..a fight where i thought its game over for the loser(at a title level)
He only lost by one point and there aren't many British fighters ranked above Pryce at Light Middlweight.
Concepcion got a British title shot, so why couldn't Pryce? Who else can Webb defend his title against?
I thought he was a welterweight now....
He has been fighting a few pounds over the Welterweight limit and there is less competition at Light Middleweight.
Re: pryce v lynes liverpool 12 feb
Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 16:46
by Tommy Gunn13
Horse wrote:Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Horse wrote:He only lost by one point and there aren't many British fighters ranked above Pryce at Light Middlweight.
Concepcion got a British title shot, so why couldn't Pryce? Who else can Webb defend his title against?
I thought he was a welterweight now....
He has been fighting a few pounds over the Welterweight limit and there is less competition at Light Middleweight.
There is not strengh in depth at L.Middle,so he may well be Webbs voluntary defence...But as ive said i thought is was a must win fight for either...was Lynes weighed in a light middle?