Page 1 of 1

John Breen: Khan hasnt got a bad chin

Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 08:47
by slapbangwhallop
It's his temple that needs hittin with a banjo!

"John Breen predicts ‘Temple of Doom’ for Amir Khan"

http://boxing-ireland.com/20110212_bree ... an_29.html

Re: John Breen: Khan hasnt got a bad chin

Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 08:49
by Dioufy
David Haye's the same, but I'm sure a lot of people use the word 'chin' as a euphemism to how a fighter can take a shot. If a fighter's hit on the temple and on dodgy legs, like Enzo Macc, I say he's got a bad chin even though his actual chin maybe pretty sturdy.

Am I alone?

Re: John Breen: Khan hasnt got a bad chin

Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 09:19
by JC
Dioufy wrote:David Haye's the same, but I'm sure a lot of people use the word 'chin' as a euphemism to how a fighter can take a shot. If a fighter's hit on the temple and on dodgy legs, like Enzo Macc, I say he's got a bad chin even though his actual chin maybe pretty sturdy.

Am I alone?
No I pretty much think about it the same way.

There also seems to be a distinction between having a bad chin and having low punch resistance. Some fighters like Floyd Patterson or more recently Brian Magee seem to get decked fairly easily but get up relatively clearheaded multiple times.

Re: John Breen: Khan hasnt got a bad chin

Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 09:27
by slapbangwhallop
J-C wrote:
Dioufy wrote:David Haye's the same, but I'm sure a lot of people use the word 'chin' as a euphemism to how a fighter can take a shot. If a fighter's hit on the temple and on dodgy legs, like Enzo Macc, I say he's got a bad chin even though his actual chin maybe pretty sturdy.

Am I alone?
No I pretty much think about it the same way.

There also seems to be a distinction between having a bad chin and having low punch resistance. Some fighters like Floyd Patterson or more recently Brian Magee seem to get decked fairly easily but get up relatively clearheaded multiple times.
Calzaghe is another, hits the deck like a sack-o-spuds and raises as if the rounds just started. Bellew another example?

Re: John Breen: Khan hasnt got a bad chin

Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 09:32
by Deno1986
slapbangwhallop wrote:It's his temple that needs hittin with a banjo!

"John Breen predicts ‘Temple of Doom’ for Amir Khan"

http://boxing-ireland.com/20110212_bree ... an_29.html
Good article, Leonard but Paul McCloskey, 22-1(12 KO)? :wink:

Re: John Breen: Khan hasnt got a bad chin

Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 09:39
by Spud
Khan wins with ease.

Re: John Breen: Khan hasnt got a bad chin

Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 09:40
by slapbangwhallop
Deno1986 wrote:
slapbangwhallop wrote:It's his temple that needs hittin with a banjo!

"John Breen predicts ‘Temple of Doom’ for Amir Khan"

http://boxing-ireland.com/20110212_bree ... an_29.html
Good article, Leonard but Paul McCloskey, 22-1(12 KO)? :wink:
sure and Breen aint the only wan dats a clairvoyant hombre! ;)

Fixed! :TU:

Re: John Breen: Khan hasnt got a bad chin

Posted: 13 Feb 2011, 09:41
by slapbangwhallop
Spud wrote:Khan wins with ease.
Is that his tag-team partner or a PED?