BoxRec

how did you score the fight???....i had it 115-114 hearns.

if anybody add thier score i will put it on my boxing blog as its the fight im covering this week

http://boxingscorecard.blogspot.com

i have add the first round of this fight on a youtube link and its very easy to follow the rest of the fight from there...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ82E7qZclk

i look forward to reading your scores

ps: admin this fight has been on youtube since 2006 so i hope im not breaking any rules by linking this fight , hence the reason i have only added the 1st round

cheers

116-111 Hearns

cheers mate

I tend to watch this fight next, as I had a big session of watching Thomas Hearns last night, and then got bored and watched some of Carl Froch's stuff when he was making his mark on the domestic scene at 12 stone.

IRLangmaid25 wrote:I tend to watch this fight next, as I had a big session of watching Thomas Hearns last night, and then got bored and watched some of Carl Froch's stuff when he was making his mark on the domestic scene at 12 stone.

ok mate post up your score as im updating the blog on thursday with this fight

116 111 hearns dominated with superior boxing skills despite his age

hearns by 2 points, can't remember exactly how i scored it

top class guys , hopefully get a few more scores before i add it to the blog today.

fight and scores now up on the blog

http://boxingscorecard.blogspot.com

boxerbob wrote:fight and scores now up on the blog

http://boxingscorecard.blogspot.com

hi bob, nice blog, my only quibble would be that I think you're under-rating Hearns' jab against Hill, somewhat.

Hill was probably throwing more jabs, and landing more in the rounds that he won

but as well as the right hand, the big difference I would say is that Hearns' jab was landing with huge, thudding, authoritative force. he was busting Hill's face up pretty good with it, even if he did need the right hand to really set himself apart from Hill in the scoring (especially bearing in mind Hearn's pretty patchy workrate throughout this fight)

Counter-puncher wrote:

boxerbob wrote:fight and scores now up on the blog

http://boxingscorecard.blogspot.com

hi bob, nice blog, my only quibble would be that I think you're under-rating Hearns' jab against Hill, somewhat.

Hill was probably throwing more jabs, and landing more in the rounds that he won

but as well as the right hand, the big difference I would say is that Hearns' jab was landing with huge, thudding, authoritative force. he was busting Hill's face up pretty good with it, even if he did need the right hand to really set himself apart from Hill in the scoring (especially bearing in mind Hearn's pretty patchy workrate throughout this fight)

the reason im mentioning hills jab so much is because of how good hearns jab is...hearns when he powers that jab is some sight...i just coulndt believe hill was out jabbing him in the rounds he won. Watching the hearns career set its apparent how good a jab hearns had but in most of his fights he could have made fights easier by using it more but as a total fighter tommy liked to get into wars.

a great great fighter

Hill didn't outjab Hearns. He got put on his ass with a jab from Tommy. That fight, imo, is a textbook in how to dominate a fight behind your jab.

in those first 5 rounds he did out jab tommy thats why he won those rounds but like a great champion tommy hearns turned it around by out jabbing the champion for the rest of the fight whilst land those big right hand bombs.