Page 1 of 1
Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 26 Feb 2011, 20:53
by WelshDevil
Chatting to a mate who is an avid follower of the sport and he was in live attendance for Steve Holdsworth vs Ricky Beumont many years ago. Holdsworths dad was the promoter, steve lost a 6 round decision.
All fair but Steve took off his gloves and didn't have any handwrapping - is this allowed now? Is wrapping compulsory?
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 26 Feb 2011, 21:01
by hurlock
they probablly felt it was a waste & didnt expect him to go the distance
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
DD
ive never heard of no wraps :!: gumshields yeah.
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 27 Feb 2011, 09:22
by taffytoon
The rules only stipulate the following -
3.22 Bandages are permitted for the protection of hands. These must be 2 inch wide soft bandages and 1 inch zink oxide plaster. The tape must not be applied over the knuckles.
It does not state that the weareing of bandages is mandatory.
I know in amateur boxing they HAVE to wear bandages as not long ago a young lad was DQ after the corner took hos gloves off and he had no bandages on.
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 27 Feb 2011, 10:37
by johnnygreaves
I've seen a few boys go in without wraps. Some journeymen just put on gloves, go out , get.out pointed , paid & fornicate off home.
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 27 Feb 2011, 10:52
by Coco
It would be crazy not to wear wraps your hands get smashed up enough taped up, I think I would prefer not to wear a gumshield
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 27 Feb 2011, 11:17
by taffytoon
Coco wrote:It would be crazy not to wear wraps your hands get smashed up enough taped up, I think I would prefer not to wear a gumshield
Now they are Compulsory
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 27 Feb 2011, 13:25
by JC
WelshDevil wrote:Chatting to a mate who is an avid follower of the sport and he was in live attendance for Steve Holdsworth vs Ricky Beumont many years ago. Holdsworths dad was the promoter, steve lost a 6 round decision.
All fair but Steve took off his gloves and didn't have any handwrapping - is this allowed now? Is wrapping compulsory?
I remember Steve Holdsworth saying he used to break his hands a lot, maybe that had something to do with it.
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 06:12
by 1southpaw
danny williams done it a few times jimmy used to go mad ??
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 06:32
by DavidPayne
You try opening a box of Kipling Cherry Bakewells with handwraps on.
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 06:40
by LeedsLad
Why can't tape be applied to the knuckles?
I wouldn't want to wear a gumshield either..... tried wearing one playing rugby and hated it, would be even worse boxing I'd imagine.
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 06:42
by DavidPayne
LeedsLad wrote:Why can't tape be applied to the knuckles?
I wouldn't want to wear a gumshield either..... tried wearing one playing rugby and hated it, would be even worse boxing I'd imagine.
The first time I sparred, they could barely do up the headguard (I have a big nugget), the gum-shield seemed to double in size and dig into the back of my mouth.....and my breathing was heavy.....clostrophobic? moi? you betcha....I hate gum-shields, but wouldn't be without one!
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 19:28
by WelshDevil
Thanks for replies, fellas.

Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 01 Mar 2011, 15:51
by danny brown
I cant think why anyone would not want to wear hand wraps when boxing,even when doing bag work,although i dont know why they bother in the amateurs,the amount they allow u to wear offers litttle or no protection whatsoever.
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 07:34
by DavidPayne
And often the only punch that scores is the "touch-gloves".
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 11:05
by Wales
Wladamir doesnt wear hand wraps
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 11:13
by orbtastic
Wales wrote:Wladamir doesnt wear hand wraps
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAh41bZynvU
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 11:20
by Wales
wouldnt open for me in work - is that the clip when he taes his gloves off and there are none there, are you proving me wrong with a clip of him having some on... sure the chagaev fight was the one where he didnt have any on... ?
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 11:21
by Coco
The clip shows one hand with and one hand without! It is unclear whether one had already been cut off already
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 11:23
by Wales
Here was one fight where it sowed the glove beng pulled off <sngger> and there were no wraps... there was also a thread on here about it just after
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 11:24
by orbtastic
It shows him having both the glove and wrap being cut off.
If you google pictures his name you will see plenty of pictures of his hands post-fight, some with wraps, some not. If you then see which are wrap-less, just youtube the fight (as I did) and see the wraps there as his gloves are removed.
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 11:26
by Wales
tre was deffo one fight where his glove was removed and there were no wrap underneath as there was a thread on here about it after... damned if i remember though
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 11:27
by Wales
** I think**
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 11:27
by orbtastic
Not saying there wasn't, would be curious to know what fight it was.
Re: Hand wraps - compulsory or not?
Posted: 02 Mar 2011, 11:42
by Wales
Iv done a searc on here but it didnt come up - perhaps someone else will remember ...