Page 1 of 1

Not to be taken too seriously but...

Posted: 03 Mar 2011, 11:41
by Ezzard
Nothing gets the board more hot under the collar than the Fab 4 debates…

So, in 1997, after Duran lost a close decision to Camacho, Hector stopped Ray Leonard.

If Duran had been given the nod against Camacho (and many thought he may have deserved it) how would Duran-Leonard IV have gone?

Does Duran even the series?

Re: Not to be taken too seriously but...

Posted: 03 Mar 2011, 11:51
by orbtastic
I think at that particular point, perhaps Duran could achieve the same result as Camacho. I remember watching it and being amazed how easily Leonard folded as I didn't really rate the Camacho of that time.

The Duran of that time was largely fighting on memory, going through the motions but I thought he beat Camacho and also Paz in their first fight.

I think I remember reading that SRL bought the rights to both that fight and his loss to Norris as he didn't want either televising again.

Re: Not to be taken too seriously but...

Posted: 03 Mar 2011, 12:01
by Syntax Error
Ezzard wrote:Nothing gets the board more hot under the collar than the Fab 4 debates…

So, in 1997, after Duran lost a close decision to Camacho, Hector stopped Ray Leonard.

If Duran had been given the nod against Camacho (and many thought he may have deserved it) how would Duran-Leonard IV have gone?

Does Duran even the series?
It's a good question.

Leonard was arguably even more shot than Duran & like you, I too was amazed how he crumbled at the hands of the light hitting Camacho, so it would probably have ended with Duran winning on points or even late(ish) TKO.

Re: Not to be taken too seriously but...

Posted: 03 Mar 2011, 12:21
by Ezzard
Never seen Leonard versus Camacho. Never will.

I turned off the Terry Norris fight.

Never seen Hearns-Barkley II as I knew the result and couldn't take sitting through it.

Re: Not to be taken too seriously but...

Posted: 03 Mar 2011, 16:08
by Syntax Error
Ezzard wrote:Never seen Leonard versus Camacho. Never will.

I turned off the Terry Norris fight.

Never seen Hearns-Barkley II as I knew the result and couldn't take sitting through it.
Barkley certainly seemed to have Hearns' number & I just can't understand it.

Some may argue that the first fight was a fluke (I don't btw), but the second one was just strange.

Nobody ever out-boxed Tommy Hearns, especially someone as slow as Barkley was.

Tommy spent years out-boxing far better fighters than Barkley & out-punching bigger punchers than him, but he just seemed to fall under Barkley's spell.