Page 1 of 1
Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 14:33
by dondada
http://www.worldboxingnews.net/2011/03/ ... orted.html?
Super headline.
What they don't tell you is that on 2nd March they ALSO ran a story entitled 'Danny Williams to stay happily retired'.
Strangely, that page no longer exists
We all get it wrong, but, you know, come on...
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 15:59
by PhilDJay
Hello Ian,
I ran that story at the request of Spencer Fearon ( I dont know if you read it or not), but obviously the fact that I was one of the first to break it then went out the window. Therefore its only right that Spencer's wrongly attributed article then be deleted as it was of no fault to my reporting.
Cheers.
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 16:29
by dondada
PhilDJay wrote:Hello Ian,
I ran that story at the request of Spencer Fearon ( I dont know if you read it or not), but obviously the fact that I was one of the first to break it then went out the window. Therefore its only right that Spencer's wrongly attributed article then be deleted as it was of no fault to my reporting.
Cheers.
I'm not really sure what you're saying...all I'm saying is that whoever did the headline today was being a bit cheeky

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 16:47
by Alba
i was confused by this ,
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 16:55
by PhilDJay
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:PhilDJay wrote:Hello Ian,
I ran that story at the request of Spencer Fearon ( I dont know if you read it or not), but obviously the fact that I was one of the first to break it then went out the window. Therefore its only right that Spencer's wrongly attributed article then be deleted as it was of no fault to my reporting.
Cheers.
I'm not really sure what you're saying...all I'm saying is that whoever did the headline today was being a bit cheeky

I just wanted to clear up that we never got it wrong, thats all.
Cheers Ian.
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 17:09
by dondada
I'm not saying you personally reported the story wrongly. But there's no point in saying 'we never got it wrong'. I read a story on the site 'confirming' that Danny Williams wasn't retiring. The story was wrong, ergo the site was wrong.
We've been wrong loads of times...I just thought it was funny that the headline gave the site the big 'un when it ran a directly contradictory story on the same day.
These things happen.
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 17:29
by MightyWarrior
Eh ? I can't work out what's going on here, it's a bit like the twilight zone. Is that a German website ? It reads like a google translation.
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 17:31
by stujones
As Linda La Hughes would say - "oh me brain"....... Danny wasn't retiring? I thought he already had - now embarking on a comeback.... oh I don't know.
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 06:18
by DavidPayne
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 06:46
by Buncey
Hold the back page!
Adios.
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 06:50
by DavidPayne
Back page?! Them were the days.
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 06:50
by DavidPayne
Whats on the show this week Steve?
Re: Love this Danny Williams bit
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 12:55
by PhilDJay
Not liking this "WRONG" stuff, it was Spencer Fearon who corrected me. But anyways lets move on. I've heard Butterbean was to move down to super-flyweight.