BoxRec

Deno1986 wrote:Is it definitely Munroe who is facing this opponent? Boxrec have Quigg vs. Isaeu listed for the same date and title.

Horse wrote:

Deno1986 wrote:Is it definitely Munroe who is facing this opponent? Boxrec have Quigg vs. Isaeu listed for the same date and title.

I think Quigg has pulled out with an injury.

Camcas wrote:Hope this guy wins Rendall deserves it for way he treated Maloney

taffytoon wrote:

Camcas wrote:Hope this guy wins Rendall deserves it for way he treated Maloney

Really

http://www.worldboxingnews.net/2011/04/ ... =BP_recent

Deserter wrote:I don't know either party, but Maloney's reaction came across as completely genuine - by contrast this statement has taken quite a while to come out. I know who I believe based on what I've seen to date.

taffytoon wrote:I will not judge either way as you will find there are three sides to every story

The one persons account of what happened
The second persons account of what happened

And

The truth

the truth wrote:

taffytoon wrote:I will not judge either way as you will find there are three sides to every story

The one persons account of what happened
The second persons account of what happened

And

The truth

FtmPress wrote:

the truth wrote:

taffytoon wrote:I will not judge either way as you will find there are three sides to every story

The one persons account of what happened
The second persons account of what happened

And

The truth

You are right and we know the truth, Still up to now i do not believe Munroe has still not pick up a phone and spoke with Frank Maloney. This is the truth Maloney has giving back all Shinefields fighters that work on Maloney's shows, Telling them to take them to the Hattons so let see what happen to those fighter and the shinefields when Munroe loses and Hatton's have no use for him.

Old bones Ian wrote:

FtmPress wrote:

the truth wrote:

You are right and we know the truth, Still up to now i do not believe Munroe has still not pick up a phone and spoke with Frank Maloney. This is the truth Maloney has giving back all Shinefields fighters that work on Maloney's shows, Telling them to take them to the Hattons so let see what happen to those fighter and the shinefields when Munroe loses and Hatton's have no use for him.

I can understand Franks frustration, but isn't that taking his annoyance out on boxers that have nothing to do with the situation?

Camcas wrote:Hope this guy wins Rendall deserves it for way he treated Maloney

gobbles wrote:I heard a rumour they were trying to make Munroe v Rigondeaux to save the bill

leforge wrote:

gobbles wrote:I heard a rumour they were trying to make Munroe v Rigondeaux to save the bill

Munroe career over then! Hattons are shit promoters! Ask macklin about them! I still shocked that rendall gone there maloney would have done s better job!

rickshere wrote:

Camcas wrote:Hope this guy wins Rendall deserves it for way he treated Maloney

Really? What about the crap way fighters get treated by Promoters? I think it good that a fighter has decided and done what he feels is best for him, after all, they are the ones who put in the hard work and take the punches along with the risks. I'm sure Maloney as other promoters have tucked up fighters along the way.

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote:

Camcas wrote:Hope this guy wins Rendall deserves it for way he treated Maloney

Really? What about the crap way fighters get treated by Promoters? I think it good that a fighter has decided and done what he feels is best for him, after all, they are the ones who put in the hard work and take the punches along with the risks. I'm sure Maloney as other promoters have tucked up fighters along the way.

With the greatest of respect you're missing the point here. It's not that Munroe has opted for an alternative career path, it's how he's done it.

rickshere wrote:

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote: Really? What about the crap way fighters get treated by Promoters? I think it good that a fighter has decided and done what he feels is best for him, after all, they are the ones who put in the hard work and take the punches along with the risks. I'm sure Maloney as other promoters have tucked up fighters along the way.

With the greatest of respect you're missing the point here. It's not that Munroe has opted for an alternative career path, it's how he's done it.

Well, what goes around comes around sometimes. The business side of boxing is more of a dog eat dog world which has mainly been made that way by the promoters/managers of the sport. You wont find a promoter or manager doing anything for a fighter without personal gain for themselves and thats all well and good but so should it be all well and good if a fighter does something for themselves for personal gain then. I'm sure Maloney made a bit of the back of Munroe. No 'favours' are done in this sport.

rickshere wrote:

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote: Really? What about the crap way fighters get treated by Promoters? I think it good that a fighter has decided and done what he feels is best for him, after all, they are the ones who put in the hard work and take the punches along with the risks. I'm sure Maloney as other promoters have tucked up fighters along the way.

With the greatest of respect you're missing the point here. It's not that Munroe has opted for an alternative career path, it's how he's done it.

Well, what goes around comes around sometimes. The business side of boxing is more of a dog eat dog world which has mainly been made that way by the promoters/managers of the sport. You wont find a promoter or manager doing anything for a fighter without personal gain for themselves and thats all well and good but so should it be all well and good if a fighter does something for themselves for personal gain then. I'm sure Maloney made a bit of the back of Munroe. No 'favours' are done in this sport.