Ten Reasons where there NEEDS to be a rematch
Posted: 17 Apr 2011, 13:26
1. Mcloskey was clearly going to win. Thats obvious. Statistics show that when a fighter loses all of the first 6 rounds, he will easily win the second half witha KO.
2. Formlines. Mcloskey has already beaten world greats as Giuseppe Lauri, Barry Morrison and Daniel Rasilla.
3. He's white.*
4. You can enver ever trust a referee, or a Doctor. Always argue with their decisions (when they don't suit you)
5. Team Mcloskey has a world beating promotional team behind them. With such power that they wield, can anyone imagine the consequences if they pulled out of boxing in protest.
6. Generally, it's all Khans fault and he is nasty.
7. Because Mcloskey gave such an awesome performance over those 6 rounds, it would be criminal not to offer the FANS a rematch.
8. Khan threw twice as many punches and landed about the same ratio more- which MUST mean Khan was due a collapse.
9. Mcloskey doesn't need this- really, he is just doing the WBC a favour by offering a rematch. He can pick and choose whom he fights, and for what.
10. The Americas will demand it. As a household name in the states, Mcloskey simply won't be denied. His forward, attacking style won him many fans that night.
11. And finally, a special at 11. We all know that had Mcloskey won all the first 6 rounds, and it had been stopped on the same cut, and he won, then the first thing he would have done was offer Khan a rematch. Indeed, in his own fight with Lauri, a controversial one in which Paul actually lost a point for head butting, Mcloskey offered a rematch. (didn't he)
* OK, even allowing for the fact that this is tounge in cheeky, this one I'm still a bit uncomfortable with. But there does seem (from some) an view not directly stated that would endorse this parody.
2. Formlines. Mcloskey has already beaten world greats as Giuseppe Lauri, Barry Morrison and Daniel Rasilla.
3. He's white.*
4. You can enver ever trust a referee, or a Doctor. Always argue with their decisions (when they don't suit you)
5. Team Mcloskey has a world beating promotional team behind them. With such power that they wield, can anyone imagine the consequences if they pulled out of boxing in protest.
6. Generally, it's all Khans fault and he is nasty.
7. Because Mcloskey gave such an awesome performance over those 6 rounds, it would be criminal not to offer the FANS a rematch.
8. Khan threw twice as many punches and landed about the same ratio more- which MUST mean Khan was due a collapse.
9. Mcloskey doesn't need this- really, he is just doing the WBC a favour by offering a rematch. He can pick and choose whom he fights, and for what.
10. The Americas will demand it. As a household name in the states, Mcloskey simply won't be denied. His forward, attacking style won him many fans that night.
11. And finally, a special at 11. We all know that had Mcloskey won all the first 6 rounds, and it had been stopped on the same cut, and he won, then the first thing he would have done was offer Khan a rematch. Indeed, in his own fight with Lauri, a controversial one in which Paul actually lost a point for head butting, Mcloskey offered a rematch. (didn't he)
* OK, even allowing for the fact that this is tounge in cheeky, this one I'm still a bit uncomfortable with. But there does seem (from some) an view not directly stated that would endorse this parody.