BoxRec

Have I missed something? Loads of websites having articles on about haye and saying he's retiring on a defeat after his next fight? Has the fight took place yet or something? I happen to believe haye will win by ko and I'm sick of reading all the hate towards haye on these American websites ,complete bias articles
What's your thoughts guys??

Don't read shite websites that are designed to cause outrage so they can sell advertising.

Stick to reputable sites that carry journalistic values (of which there are only about five).

Boxingnews24 is one of the worst sites out there. Steer clear of it at all costs. It's not journalism; it's people with sub-100 IQs ranting bias-laden tripe.

Those ''articles'' are written to generate comments and extra clicks - and thus advertising revenue.

Imagine getting paid to talk bollocks

Anyone can write what they like for boxingnews24 probably the worst boxing website out there for interesting stories

I've not read the article in question but imagine they are responding to Hayes comments in an interview on 5Live. The summary of the interview is in the bbc website (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/13741467.stm)

The only sites i use are Boxrec News&Boxing News...Can anyone recommend any others?

Tommy Gunn13 wrote:The only sites i use are Boxrec News&Boxing News...Can anyone recommend any others?

I use FightNews and ESPN America's boxing section.

Fight Hype, BoxingTalk

Didn't Maloney once say he had over 80 websites apply for one show?

That's just crazy. I doubt I could name 20, even if I was given all day.

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Didn't Maloney once say he had over 80 websites apply for one show?

That's just crazy. I doubt I could name 20, even if I was given all day.

Ha'way Ian man, I could name 80 websites easy. It's just that 72 of them would feature 'Art Films'.

Im only after the good honest ones chaps,more interested in UK news than Foreign news to be honest

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Didn't Maloney once say he had over 80 websites apply for one show?

That's just crazy. I doubt I could name 20, even if I was given all day.

Ha'way Ian man, I could name 80 websites easy. It's just that 72 of them would feature 'Art Films'.

Boxing sites I mean

Tommy Gunn13 wrote:The only sites i use are Boxrec News&Boxing News...Can anyone recommend any others?

For pure information, Boxing Scene, Fightnews, Eastsideboxing.

But I prefer to just use this: http://newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Boxing

I used to read secondsout but it's gone very poor over the last year or so. The endless articles about Salita, Greenburg & Yuri Foreman tended to show a bit of a bias towards a certain background

Doug Fischer of the Ringonline and Steve Kim of maxboxing are the only US writers I read these days. Oh and Hauser of course

BN24 is a terrible, terrible site

he has said he wants out by 31.

which is october 13th.

vitali-adamek doesn't happen until 10th september.

if he beats wladimir he'll surely have to stick around for vitali.

huge disappointment if he retires tbh.

Boxing News 24 is terrible. Agree it's just sensationalist crap to draw people in, get the comments flowing and make advertising revenue. A 'trash site' if you will for boxing, can;t stand it myself but each to their own.

boxrec and eastside are the best , BS is also decent especially with news.

fightnews , espn , secondsout are the other ones i know

newsnow is excellent for everything

Boxingnews24 is the equivelant of a bug eyed drunk sitting in the corner of a pub, writing his "thoughts" on the back of a beer mat.

Asterix wrote:Boxingnews24 is one of the worst sites out there. Steer clear of it at all costs. It's not journalism; it's people with sub-100 IQs ranting bias-laden tripe.

100% agree.
Boxingnews24's terrible reputation is well deserved.

Not to be read unless you appreciate highly subjective and speculative articles and errounous reporting.
My favorite is when they reported some Wladimir Klitschko fight being a flop and the box office because it only had sold 17,000 tickets.
The dullard that wrote the article hadn't even bothered to check the seating capacity in the arena, which was - have a guess - 17,000.
Yeah, a packed house, what a flop that was

Not surprisingly the "article" was deleted after a short while.