Page 1 of 2
Breaking news: Lawrence Murphy gets Farnell
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 18:38
by bennie
WBU middleweight champion Lawrence Murphy will make the first defence of his title against former champion Anthony Farnell on March 6 at the Braehead Arena in Glasgow.
Farnell made a successful return in December after a medical query, outpointing Peacock's Tomas Da Silva over six tough rounds.
Re: Breaking news: Lawrence Murphy gets Farnell
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 19:07
by stujones
bennie wrote:WBU middleweight champion Lawrence Murphy will make the first defence of his title against former champion Anthony Farnell on March 6 at the Braehead Arena in Glasgow.
Farnell made a successful return in December after a medical query, outpointing Peacock's Tomas Da Silva over six tough rounds.
Whilst I did mention Farnell as my tip, I'm still quiet shocked at this one - Farnell should be focusing on his own career which he claimed would be a Light Middle from now on.
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 19:18
by REAL_DEAL
my moneys on a farnell win
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 19:20
by bennie
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 19:20
by Dutch Windmill
How do you find these things out on sunday night?
good fight though
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 19:29
by bennie
Dutch Windmill wrote:How do you find these things out on sunday night?
good fight though
Don't be bashful, Dutch. You know it was you who told me!

Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 19:37
by REAL_DEAL
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 19:38
by bennie
I was going on the premise that Elcock outclassed Farnell, yet Murphy sparked Elcock in a round!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 19:39
by REAL_DEAL
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 19:42
by bennie
Well, Joe Frazier beat Muhammad Ali but then lost to George Foreman. So when Foreman met Ali there was only one winner. Oops! :(
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 20:22
by bigynzing
Make or break fight for both, methinks. If Murphy loses im sure people will say the Elcock fight was a fluke. If Farnell were to lose then i really dont know what there is left for Arnie....having chatted to the lad i know how much boxing means to him.
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 20:34
by jamesmcdonnell
Personally, I think the Elcock fight was a complete fluke, the shot which
put him down wasn't a great punch, it's just that it landed high on the head and sparked him out.
Posted: 11 Jan 2004, 20:59
by bigynzing
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Personally, I think the Elcock fight was a complete fluke, the shot which
put him down wasn't a great punch, it's just that it landed high on the head and sparked him out.
Who`s your Money on the James?
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 08:12
by Lugh
Tough to call IMO - Honestly i believe we are talking about three really average fighters here.
Elcock beat Farnell - so what?
Murphy blows out Elcock (agreed on the "lucky punch" - hard to know what Murphyis capable of) - So what - the only decent name on his rec was Farnell.
I personally give big props to allegedly - he must have been gutted when his biggest ticket seller lost his "title" - now he has as good a chance as he'll ever have to get it back.
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 08:17
by Kieran
Let me start by saying I like Arnie as a person, but from a boxing perspective I just don't get it.
On what basis does Arnie justify getting this chance ?
Why shout from the rooftops about a new regime and brag about how his weight has fallen off etc, to then take a Middleweight fight ?
There are other far more deserving Middleweights in the UK than Arnie, who should get this chance.
Personally, I hope Murphy takes him out.
If it happens, I can read the excuses now.
Mind not on it, weight problems etc etc, really I'm a light Middle ........
And do you know what ? Warren will still give him another chance.
Like I say, I just don't get it.
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 08:39
by MightyWarrior
Well I suppose It's not like anyone really cares who the WBU middleweight champ is - it's not a world title, it means f**k all really.
If I suddenly decided I'm the new WBI middleweight champ, and my first challenger was going to be my next door neighbour Bob ( 0-0-0 )
who can really complain? I make the rules up as I go along, and it's all make believe anyway!
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 09:10
by Lugh
MightyWarrior wrote:If I suddenly decided I'm the new WBI middleweight champ, and my first challenger was going to be my next door neighbour Bob ( 0-0-0 )
What odds are you giving Bob?
I'll go a fiver on Bob for a first round KO.
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 09:19
by MightyWarrior
Lugh wrote:MightyWarrior wrote:If I suddenly decided I'm the new WBI middleweight champ, and my first challenger was going to be my next door neighbour Bob ( 0-0-0 )
What odds are you giving Bob?
I'll go a fiver on Bob for a first round KO.
Ok you're on - Bob will be 5-1 on. He's around 60 years old and very short sighted, but he's been putting in a lot of sparring with his wife Mable, who's a tricky southpaw.
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 09:45
by kevo
You just know thatt if Farnell wins, he's going to start on about how he's a three time world champ, and should be thought of in the same way as Lewis. The Tool will probably start to cry as well!
By the way, I'll have a tenner on Bob
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 10:04
by JimStone
Kevo,
You're wrong.
I know for a fact that Arnie knows the WBU is not a top tier world title and would never put himself on a par with the worlds elite.
What you have to remember is that the lad is trying to make a living. He's hardly going to sit at ringside and say "The WBU's a sack of shite so I've decided not to fight for it, instead I'm going to dedicate my career to fighting 6 rounders for about a thirtieth of the money I'd earn for the bollocks that is the WBU."
It's easy for people to slag off the lesser belts, and IMO they deserve slagging, but I don't think you can blame the boxers for going for them. The money you get for a WBU challenge or defence is sadly far far greater that what you'd get for a ten rounder with no belt on the line.
Arnie is not a "tool", don't be so disrespectful.
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 10:08
by Goz
Regardless of what people think about either Murphy's potential or Farnell's limitations I think this is an intriguing match-up.
Whilst their respective results against Elcock make one favour Murphy you have to feel theat there are other factors, I don't believe Murphy is that much better than Farnell, certainly not as much as the Elcock results might suggest.
I'll be looking forward to this one...
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 10:29
by kevo
Farnell doesn't think the WBU is a top tier world title? Is that why he sobbed " I'm a world Champion" after beating Groenwold?
Believe it or not there are fighters out there who will slate these belts after winning ( Enzo Maccarinelli " I know I'm not a real world champ" after winnig his WBU strap").
I appreciate he's trying to make a living, in possibly the hardest sport in the world and therfore earns every penny.
And he is a tool
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 10:42
by REAL_DEAL
actually the WBU was invented so a certain promoter doesnt have to match his best fighters, say if boxer A held the british title and boxer B wanted to fight for it, the boards would probably demand a fight between them. So a certain promoter gives boxer A and shot at the WBU belt to keep both fighters happy. The WBU is a good belt to get if you want to avoid the best in britain.
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 10:46
by JimStone
It was more the elation of beating Rueban that led to the tears I believe. When you talk to him in the cold, light of day he knows the score. After you've won a hard fight the elation you feel is something else and you're floating about in another world for a good few minutes, and you may well say and do some things that are a bit daft. You know what I mean, like footballers going barmy when they score a goal.
I bet Enzo got told to refrain from those sort of comments.
He's not a tool. Infact I bet you're a Liverpool supporter and you dislike him purely because he's a Manc'
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 12 Jan 2004, 11:01
by Lugh
I don't begrudge Farnell a few tears shed.
If you can't have a blub after achieving a lifetime ambition (in some respect) then when can you?
Does anyone remember Hatton doing his nut when he one his? Was it Thaxton?
He and Billy Graham went beserk - alright there were no tears but even so, it was WAAAAAAAAAY over the top for a crap strap