Page 1 of 2

hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 00:04
by patron
what did you think of the decision in the main event last night,i thought it was a promoters result.all the best

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 02:56
by rb63
Hamdan won easily.

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 04:34
by Brute
I thought Nader did enough to win. Great fight.

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 07:42
by Sweet P
Nader took it 116-112 in my opinion. There were a few close rounds but Nader did a bit more. Just my opinion and a rematch would be great.
I have to say, the whole card last night was great, Good tough fights.

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 08:05
by Beltane
Great fight and card with Nader just that bit busier and earned the judge's decision.

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 09:06
by patron
Beltane wrote:Great fight and card with Nader just that bit busier and earned the judge's decision.
i had pawsey 2up going into the 11th, nader come home well but igave the 11th a draw,naders charge home swayed the judges,i can,t see how he won it easily,he got the nod and credit to him,i thought it was a good night, i still don,t believe a trainer of a fighter should be the promoter also,same as a fighter promoting his own fights,all of wich is just my opinion. all the best

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 09:14
by dberry
patron wrote:
Beltane wrote:Great fight and card with Nader just that bit busier and earned the judge's decision.
i had pawsey 2up going into the 11th, nader come home well but igave the 11th a draw,naders charge home swayed the judges,i can,t see how he won it easily,he got the nod and credit to him,i thought it was a good night, i still don,t believe a trainer of a fighter should be the promoter also,same as a fighter promoting his own fights,all of wich is just my opinion. all the best
You do realise that the judges score each round individually then hand their score cards for the round in before the start of each round, don't you?

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 09:26
by patron
dberry wrote:
patron wrote:
Beltane wrote:Great fight and card with Nader just that bit busier and earned the judge's decision.
i had pawsey 2up going into the 11th, nader come home well but igave the 11th a draw,naders charge home swayed the judges,i can,t see how he won it easily,he got the nod and credit to him,i thought it was a good night, i still don,t believe a trainer of a fighter should be the promoter also,same as a fighter promoting his own fights,all of wich is just my opinion. all the best
You do realise that the judges score each round individually then hand their score cards for the round in before the start of each round, don't you?
actually i thought they were sending dirty jokes,thanks for enlightening me on that point.all the best

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 09:27
by dberry
:lol: Nice. Dirty jokes................. :o you know, they probably are.
All the best to you too sir.

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 21:33
by buster007
i thought they r writing their shopping list.

doh!!!

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 17 Jul 2011, 03:18
by Mark pawsey
Brute wrote:I thought Nader did enough to win. Great fight.
What do you mean he did enough to win? Who was the champion?

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 17 Jul 2011, 03:34
by buster007
means nader won.

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 17 Jul 2011, 15:01
by Mark pawsey
buster007 wrote:means nader won.
Ok but saying he did enough to win, is talking like he was the title holder. I've spoken to a few people about the fIght, all the people I've spoke to that know boxing say Daniel won, than all the people that, I've spokan to that don't know much about boxing say it was close.

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 17 Jul 2011, 16:48
by Brute
It's a matter of opinion.

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 18 Jul 2011, 04:24
by buster007
mark,

i watched it and was hoping it was a draw.

i thought it was one of those fights where both fighters did plenty to say they don't deserve to lose. i feel for the fighters who put so much work into competing for a few minutes, showing a huge ticker in a war of a fight, but fights like this can be difficult to score.

naders punches were harder, but maybe didn't throw as many. he did catch many on the gloves too, that may have been the difference for the judges to award him the win.

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 18 Jul 2011, 05:35
by D J Pawsey
I will say this about the fight. I personally think i won the fight 8 rounds to 4. Everyone else is entitled to there say. Nadar Told me i won before the decsion was read out.
A rematch would be great. We could do it in my home town of Condobolin. I just fought him on his home turf. Gary dean scored it 119 to 112 what a joke.
I'm ready to right now!!!

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 18 Jul 2011, 17:40
by Brute
If it was as good as the fight the other night a rematch would be great. :box:

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 18 Jul 2011, 19:39
by Mark pawsey
patron wrote:
dberry wrote:
patron wrote: i had pawsey 2up going into the 11th, nader come home well but igave the 11th a draw,naders charge home swayed the judges,i can,t see how he won it easily,he got the nod and credit to him,i thought it was a good night, i still don,t believe a trainer of a fighter should be the promoter also,same as a fighter promoting his own fights,all of wich is just my opinion. all the best
You do realise that the judges score each round individually then hand their score cards for the round in before the start of each round, don't you?
actually i thought they were sending dirty jokes,thanks for enlightening me on that point.all the best
I think Garry Dean was sending dirty jokes, he must of been. I don't know what he was doing. I don't think he was watching the fight anyway.

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 05 Aug 2011, 11:25
by #1 BoXa
Nader Hamdan won almost every round well done at the age of 37 , and all credit to his great trainer who is also my trainer Mick Akaway who has brought the best out in him... Nader "The Lionheart is the Bernard Hopkins of Aus..

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 05 Aug 2011, 22:55
by buster007
u have plenty of credibility, :)

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 14:58
by Mark pawsey
#1 BoXa wrote:Nader Hamdan won almost every round well done at the age of 37 , and all credit to his great trainer who is also my trainer Mick Akaway who has brought the best out in him... Nader "The Lionheart is the Bernard Hopkins of Aus..
Is your name Garry Dean?

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 07 Aug 2011, 05:54
by D J Pawsey
#1boxa get ya head out of your ass. He won every round please and who gives 2 f..ks who you train with Nadar has already said in the daily telegraph he will not give me a rematch tells me all i need to know about the fight. Also before the decision was read out he told me he thought i won.
He is Chasing Stigletz hate to break it to him but Robert is fighting Kesller.
Nadar i'm hear waiting for the call the judges won't be needed this time it won,t go the distance

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 07 Aug 2011, 09:28
by boxheadtrinidad
Hamdan did come home strong in late rounds, But i thought Pawsey was did enough...

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 07 Aug 2011, 09:34
by boxheadtrinidad
D J Pawsey wrote:I will say this about the fight. I personally think i won the fight 8 rounds to 4. Everyone else is entitled to there say. Nadar Told me i won before the decsion was read out.
A rematch would be great. We could do it in my home town of Condobolin. I just fought him on his home turf. Gary dean scored it 119 to 112 what a joke.
I'm ready to right now!!!
:TU: if it goes to condo, get me a ticket....

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Posted: 07 Aug 2011, 09:36
by boxheadtrinidad
#1 BoXa wrote:Nader Hamdan won almost every round well done at the age of 37 , and all credit to his great trainer who is also my trainer Mick Akaway who has brought the best out in him... Nader "The Lionheart is the Bernard Hopkins of Aus..
:lol: more like Bernard Tomic bahahahaha...