BoxRec

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Raqyk8N2 ... ture=feedu

My guess was our Glyn.

The younger Warren seems to be following in his dads footsteps talking about the comment being libellous.

Truly cringeworthy stuff - for starters, it's clearly not a "freak" injury given Cook's well-documented back issues. Secondly, what else are the betting patterns, if not dark? Are there a group of psychics in East London we're not aware of?!

Scottrf wrote:The younger Warren seems to be following in his dads footsteps talking about the comment being libellous.

I saw that he looks an unlikeable character.

Who is the reporter?

Finch wrote:Who is the reporter?

Sophia De Stefano

It seems Warren jr is a chip off the old block with this libel crap.

I can't see FWP lasting long with those two utter clowns in charge, at least Frank has half a brain cell.

C'mon Matchroom

warren is a crook! sue me waren junior!

Glyn,
Fancy joining me for a pint to watch future Wazza shows on telly ?
Get your coat, you're barred !

twenty six wrote:Glyn,
Fancy joining me for a pint to watch future Wazza shows on telly ?
Get your coat, you're barred !

The only bars you have to worry about are the ones on your windows, fraud!

DD
Fly Fishing, by J R Hartley.

He says at the very end that no one at all said this was a bad fight before first bell?!!

Em no - when a protected "world" champion fights a guy who hasnt fought anyone for almost 3 years then if you came on twitter or "whatever it is" then you wouldve seen the everywhere!

Mon the Keyboard Warriors!

ThereByTheGrace wrote:He says at the very end that no one at all said this was a bad fight before first bell?!!

Em no - when a protected "world" champion fights a guy who hasnt fought anyone for almost 3 years then if you came on twitter or "whatever it is" then you wouldve seen the everywhere!

Mon the Keyboard Warriors!

I dont think its fair to call burns protected at this point in time, he hasnt had enough defences yet. Cook on paper is one of the best SFW's in britiain, well was until the other night.

kingfinn wrote:

ThereByTheGrace wrote:He says at the very end that no one at all said this was a bad fight before first bell?!!

Em no - when a protected "world" champion fights a guy who hasnt fought anyone for almost 3 years then if you came on twitter or "whatever it is" then you wouldve seen the everywhere!

Mon the Keyboard Warriors!

I dont think its fair to call burns protected at this point in time, he hasnt had enough defences yet. Cook on paper is one of the best SFW's in britiain, well was until the other night.

This months boxing monthly top 10 domestic super featherweights did not include him!

twenty six wrote:Glyn,
Fancy joining me for a pint to watch future Wazza shows on telly ?
Get your coat, you're barred !