BoxRec

Technical wrote:Reading my BOXING MONTHLY and just noticed allegedly's answer to the question 'Are SKY right to drop Khan from PPV? Franks answer went along the lines of 'It does not matter who shows it you still have to pay £15.00. Frank now has a channel on SKY called 'allegedly' Channel 456? Will this soon be a PPV outlet for Frank?

probably a back up plan if he does not get another sky contract.

Technical wrote:

leforge wrote:

Technical wrote:Reading my BOXING MONTHLY and just noticed allegedly's answer to the question 'Are SKY right to drop Khan from PPV? Franks answer went along the lines of 'It does not matter who shows it you still have to pay £15.00. Frank now has a channel on SKY called 'allegedly' Channel 456? Will this soon be a PPV outlet for Frank?

probably a back up plan if he does not get another sky contract.

If thats is the cae ehow would he show the fights unless they are PPV? I supposwe spoonsorship could cover the costs of the fighters wages etc, but looks to me as if we may be paying another outlet at some point. Might not be a bad thing, time will tell.

your second ever post is supportive of additional PPV's to see UK based fights? There's plenty you need to learn about this forum.

I smell a rat, or maybe a frog-faced mole...

earsjohn wrote:your second ever post is supportive of additional PPV's to see UK based fights? There's plenty you need to learn about this forum.

I smell a rat, or maybe a frog-faced mole...

earsjohn wrote:

Technical wrote:

leforge wrote: probably a back up plan if he does not get another sky contract.

If thats is the cae ehow would he show the fights unless they are PPV? I supposwe spoonsorship could cover the costs of the fighters wages etc, but looks to me as if we may be paying another outlet at some point. Might not be a bad thing, time will tell.

your second ever post is supportive of additional PPV's to see UK based fights? There's plenty you need to learn about this forum.

I smell a rat, or maybe a frog-faced mole...

Me too

Showing repeats after a week. I don't think this is good news, lads.

Technical wrote:Reading my BOXING MONTHLY and just noticed allegedly's answer to the question 'Are SKY right to drop Khan from PPV? Franks answer went along the lines of 'It does not matter who shows it you still have to pay £15.00. Frank now has a channel on SKY called 'allegedly' Channel 456? Will this soon be a PPV outlet for Frank?

Interesting. Good move by Frank IMO.

He will realise that no-one will pay for dross soon enough meaning more matches like Murray-Mitchell get made and arena's won't sit half empty for clashes between the best we have to offer after years of mainly building records. Meanwhile we've got Matchroom, Maloney all trying to please the fans to take over as the premier promoter. The money saved by FW's forgone contract may hopefully allow us to watch more international fights.

i admit i would pay a fiver via PPV for a normal FW show........ ..... is Frank thinking along those lines?

Dioufy wrote:Showing repeats after a week. I don't think this is good news, lads.

well FW has his fights on his YT channel even quicker.

I personally love it

Warren should let this channel show the undercard fights live before the Sky Sports coverage starts?

WOODDDDDDDYA wrote:Warren should let this channel show the undercard fights live before the Sky Sports coverage starts?

Agreed.... Was thinking that also!