Page 1 of 1
A question for Billy Nelson
Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 17:49
by HPI
Can you please explain why yourself and Ricky keep stating we want to fight Fana next for the Ring Belt?
As you can see from the link below the belt is vacant
http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings/jr-lightweight
So why keep on banging on about Fana?
Re: A question for Billy Nelson
Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 17:53
by Scottrf
The Dark Destroyer wrote:A fight between the rings one and two would be for the ring belt.
Normally I don't like people saying this but /thread.
Re: A question for Billy Nelson
Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 17:54
by Finn
What a wally! whilst you were on the ring site maybe you should have read up on how you win the ring belt.
Re: A question for Billy Nelson
Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 18:43
by HPI
Well that explains it then
So explain this, with Fana having not fought for almost a year, at what point will his status as number 1 be removed? Surely he doesn't stay there indefinite when the likes of Burns at No2 and Uchiyama No 3 are continuing to fight on a regular basis. Will one of these two not be elevated to number 1 soon?
Re: A question for Billy Nelson
Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 20:04
by crusader
HPI wrote:Well that explains it then
So explain this, with Fana having not fought for almost a year, at what point will his status as number 1 be removed? Surely he doesn't stay there indefinite when the likes of Burns at No2 and Uchiyama No 3 are continuing to fight on a regular basis. Will one of these two not be elevated to number 1 soon?
Fana will be removed if he doesn't fight within the next two months and Burns will supersede him in the top spot. Notwithstanding the current rankings, I believe that Uchiyama is a much tougher opponent for Burns than Fana is at this stage (I think Fana would lose to several fighters in The Ring's top ten), so if Ricky wants to become The Ring champ his team better get working on the fight with Fana.